No, there's no such thing as a "national gun registry"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Old Dog

Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2004
Messages
10,868
Location
on Puget Sound
But you all should see some of these clips from a certain director of the federal agency in charge of firearms regulation.

The director seems to admit the bureau has a database of all firearms sold, but that he pays Adobe Acrobat to "remove the search feature."

And then expounds on the myriad number of bureau employees charged with removing staples from the "boxes and boxes" of incoming paper records, and then scanning them.

edit to add: You may not care much for this particular YouTuber, but watch through to see the clips of the actual interview with Dettelbach, and then be the judge of what is really being said (and not said).

https://youtu.be/N-GLGpg7-LM
 
Last edited:
Millions upon millions of records? From where? And what kind (he never says)?

4473’s stay with the FFL until the business is closed/license discontinued. Does it make sense that Martinsburg would be receiving that many every day? And why would a 4473 be stapled? (Which “teams” of people seem to work on removing for 40 hours per week).

The dots just don’t connect between the clips and the processes that are in place for collecting and retaining information…I’d like to see the whole interview to put those clips into context.
 
Last edited:
director seems to admit the bureau has a database of all firearms sold, but that he pays Adobe Acrobat to "remove the search feature."

watch through to see the clips of the actual interview with Dettelbach, and then be the judge of what is really being said
this thread won't last past sunrise. Dettlebach reminds me of Jerry Nadler.
If the thread is closed, you can continue the discussion at the "other" THR forum where all topics discussion is allowed - https://notechtyranny.com/index.php?threads/dead-in-here.321/#post-9438

Representative Troy Nehls (R-TX) calls out quote from ATF director to prove he's "unqualified"

Hearing where ATF director stated he is not a "firearms expert"
 
Millions upon millions of records? From where? And what kind (he never says)?

4473’s stay with the FFL until the business is closed/license discontinued. Does it make sense that Martinsburg would be receiving that many every day? And why would a 4473 be stapled? (Which “teams” of people seem to work on removing for 40 hours per week).

The dots just don’t connect between the clips and the processes that are in place for collecting and retaining information…I’d like to see the whole interview to put those clips into context.
4473s used to be single sheets of paper stapled together. Not the folded scannable document that it is today. I dont believe there is any way that the government ISN'T storing that data in a way that either can't be searched currently, or the search function can't be added with little trouble. They just aren't going to let that kind of a resource go.
 
Anybody who honestly believes there's no "national gun registry" is woefully ignorant or naive.

Or lying, as the case may be.

I will grant that there's no national gun registry that's anywhere close to being 100% accurate, given the way the information is collected and the fact that it can be decades out of date or lagging. But it's there, nonetheless.

And the laws are changing all the time in the government's favor. Like FFL record retention, for example.

Until very recently (4/11/2022), the Form 4473 retention requirement was 20 years. After that, they could be destroyed. If an FFL went out of business, he was required to turn over all Form 4473 records that had not gone past 20 years. This is governed by 27CFR478.129(b):

Licensees shall retain each Form 4473 and Form 4473(LV) for a period of not less than 20 years after the date of sale or disposition. Where a licensee has initiated a NICS check for a proposed firearms transaction, but the sale, delivery, or transfer of the firearm is not made, the licensee shall record any transaction number on the Form 4473, and retain the Form 4473 for a period of not less than 5 years after the date of the NICS inquiry. Forms 4473 shall be retained in the licensee's records as provided in § 478.124(b): Provided, That Forms 4473 with respect to which a sale, delivery or transfer did not take place shall be separately retained in alphabetical (by name of transferee) or chronological (by date of transferee's certification) order.

However, the ATF got a rule (2021R-05F) passed which includes a change to the records retention requirements. The Record Retention portion states:

FFLs must retain their Firearms Transaction Records, Forms 4473, and acquisition and disposition records until they discontinue their business or licensed activity. The rule also allows for paper records older than 20 years to be stored at a separate warehouse or electronically in accordance with a forthcoming ATF Ruling. The separate warehouse is considered part of the licensed premises and subject to inspection.

(Bold mine for emphasis.)


There are rules about how those records are to be maintained and controlled, and the ATF is always pushing (read: "violating") those boundaries whenever they see fit. Like, they can come and inspect those records any time they wish, but they're not allowed to make copies. Yet we can all find plenty of stories from FFLs who have had exactly this happen.

Oh, and apparently there's an electronic Form 4473 program, too. Let me tell you how much faith I have in THIS aspect: absolutely none.


Notice how 2021R-05F conveniently closes up any loophole for records older than 20 years, wherein an FFL goes out of business and is required to turn over all records to the ATF Out-of-Business Records Center?


No national registry my my keister. By their own admission, the ATF National Tracing Center receives 1.2 MILLION out-of-business records PER MONTH and has received several hundred million such records since 1968. And yet another source (NPB article linked below) states that NTC receives 7 million pages of "mostly gun sale records from shuttered businesses".


 
1. Dettlebach is a moron.
2. Liberty Doll's video is rehashing information that isn't new, isn't shocking, isn't news, isn't even controversial. But ya'll suck it up.
3. Ya'll embarrass yourselves by an utter fascination with YouTubers who misinform, sensationalize and misrepresent.
4. ATF has no means to use Adobe Acrobat with or without a "search feature" to search forms THEY DON'T HAVE!
5. Dettlebach will always be a moron.
6. Some of ya'll, Liberty Doll included, don't understand what Dettlebach thinks he's discussing.

What Dettlebach is trying to explain is how ATF conducts a firearm trace. Liberty Doll at 1:45 confuses "registry" with the process used by ATF to conduct a trace. It took the next ten seconds to realize she needs to shut up and do lipstick reviews.

1. ATF's only national firearms registry is for NFA Firearms. That registry has been in use since 1934, well before there ever was an ATF. Every transfer of possession requires ATF approval and most are taxed.
2. There is no national registry for Title I firearms. Period. Anyone who says otherwise is either ignorant at best, a complete idiot at worst. Don't be ignorant. Don't be a Dettlebach.
3. The Gun Control Act of 1968, a federal law passed by Congress, requires that manufacturers report the firearms they manufacture to ATF. That report includes model, serial#, caliber, etc.
4. The GCA also requires manufacturers to record the disposition of that firearm to the FFL they ship to. This isn't reported to ATF.
5. The GCA requires the receiving dealer or distributor to record the acquisition in their bound books and the subsequent disposition to another dealer or another distributor. Again, this isn't reported to ATF.
6. When a firearm is ultimately transferred to a nonlicensee, a Form 4473 Firearm Transaction Record is completed by the buyer, a NICS background check is run and the dealer notes the disposition to the buyer in his records. AGAIN, NOT REPORTED to the ATF.
7. When that buyer subsequently transfers/sells/gifts/trades/etc that firearm to another person...........AGAIN, not reported to ATF.

Some "registry" huh? :rofl:



"Follow the gun" ?:rofl:
What Dettlebach is explaining is how a firearm trace is conducted. Since he's an idiot and Liberty Doll is as well, here is the how its done. For like the millionth time on THR:
1. A police officer recovers a firearm at a crime scene, runs a serial# from a gun found at a traffic stop, basically any firearm that law enforcement has a need to verify.
2. For stolen firearms, the FBI maintains the NCIC database of stolen property. A police officer on "official business only" can query that database to see if a firearm was reported stolen. That will show who the victim was and allow for the return of the gun.
3. But for a firearm that WASN'T reported stolen, he contacts the ATF National Tracing Center. An LEO can contact the NTC, give them the manufacturer/model/serial#/caliber and the ATF NTC will begin the trace. Here's the first clue that ATF doesn't have a database or registry......they can't go look it up because they don't have that information. You can't use Adobe Acrobat with or without a search feature of you don't have information to find.;)

ATF NTC will use the firearm information that the requesting agency submitted and then:
-NTC contacts the manufacturer: "Uh, we have a Glock 19, serial# AAA123, 9mm, can you tell me the disposition? Glock will tell them "we shipped that pistol to RSR Distributors in Grand Prairie, TX on 10/1/2023".
-NTC then contacts RSR Distributors and asks them the same question. RSR responds with "we shipped that gun to Hart Sports in Plano, TX on 10/15/2023"
-NTC then contacts Hart Sports and asks me the same question. If to another FFL, I give them his name and FFL#. If to a nonlicensee I fax or email a copy of that Form 4473. Why do I fax or email the Form 4473? BECAUSE ATF DOESN'T HAVE A REGISTRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They don't know who the current possessor is! They make phone calls to the businesses that are required by law to keep records forever!:cuss:

-NTC then forwards the buyers name and information to the LE agency that requested the firearm trace. That agency may or may not contact that buyer. If they do, it's "do you still have this gun?" or "do you know the name of the person you sold/traded/gifted/etc this gun to?" "Oh, you don't remember? Thanks BuhBye". That's it. Trace is over. Done. Each FFL contacted by ATF NTC has 24 hours to respond. So a trace to that first 4473 may take several days.


Now, where the confusion begins (other than the near total ignorance and plenty of stupidity by Dettlebach and Liberty Doll) is "Out of Business" records stored by ATF.
Again, the Gun Control Act of 1968, federal law, requires ATF to store the records from FFL's that have discontinued business. Up until last year, a dealer could destroy any of his 4473's that were older than age twenty. Any of his records that were not yet twenty years old he was required to keep at his business premises.

But last year, that changed. Rule 2021R-05 now requires all FFL's to store records permanently, until they discontinue business. At that point the FFL is required to send in his bound book, 4473's etc to ATF in Martinsburg, West Virginia. The building where ATF used to store them is caving in so they store those old 4473's in storage containers in the parking lot.

Remember I said this isn't new, isn't shocking, isn't news, isn't even controversial?
From NPR in 2013: The Low-Tech Way Guns Get Traced
Here's a 2016 article from the rabidly anti gun "The Trace" :The ATF’s Nonsensical Non-Searchable Gun Databases, Explained


Yet it's 2023 and Liberty Doll just now thinks OMG! OMG! Databases!:rofl:

So, EVEN IF, ATF had a database of those millions of out of business records, what good does it do?
IMO....zero. Doesn't do a damned thing for the gun owner.

What IS THE PURPOSE of firearm traces? IMO, tracking guns to an FFL. Thats really all they care about. Being able to tie a gun recovered at a crime scene to a particular FFL. They want to be able to show that Dealer X has a lot of firearms being used in crimes or recovered at crime scenes. A dealer who has a lot of gun traces with a short "time to crime" faces extra scruitney and additional recordkeeping requirements. They also get compliance inspections more often.
 
Anybody who honestly believes there's no "national gun registry" is woefully ignorant or naive.

Or lying, as the case may be.

I will grant that there's no national gun registry that's anywhere close to being 100% accurate, given the way the information is collected and the fact that it can be decades out of date or lagging. But it's there, nonetheless.
I honestly believethere is "no national gun registry". I explained whu above.
Those that do.......don't understand what "gun registry" really means.

No federal law, no ATF requirement to document the sale/transfer/gift of a firearm to your neighbor or anyone else in your state. THAT'S a gun registry and some states have such laws.




And the laws are changing all the time in the government's favor. Like FFL record retention, for example.
It's OUR government and OUR elected representatives that voted those laws into place.


the ATF is always pushing (read: "violating") those boundaries whenever they see fit. Like, they can come and inspect those records any time they wish,
False.
ATF is limited to one compliance inspection per year and YOU KNOW THAT.
There is no need to falsify ATF misdeeds when there are plenty of actual violations to mention.


but they're not allowed to make copies. Yet we can all find plenty of stories from FFLs who have had exactly this happen.
Again, false.
Nothing prevents an ATF IOI from making a copy of a Form 4473 in furtherance of a bonafide investigation.


Oh, and apparently there's an electronic Form 4473 program, too. Let me tell you how much faith I have in THIS aspect: absolutely none.
"Aparrently"? Like SINCE 2012 ?:what:
There are numerous threads and posts here on THR about "electronic From 4473".........eForm 4473 is form filling software and doesn't connect to the internet. This has been beat to death since the ATF announced it over a decade ago.




No national registry my my keister. By their own admission, the ATF National Tracing Center receives 1.2 MILLION out-of-business records PER MONTH and has received several hundred million such records since 1968. And yet another source (NPB article linked below) states that NTC receives 7 million pages of "mostly gun sale records from shuttered businesses".
Again, you need to understand the difference in what a "registry" is and isn't. A clue is the NFA Registry.
 
4473s used to be single sheets of paper stapled together. Not the folded scannable document that it is today. I dont believe there is any way that the government ISN'T storing that data in a way that either can't be searched currently, or the search function can't be added with little trouble. They just aren't going to let that kind of a resource go.
Current 4473's are perforated and often the perforation gives way, hence stapling.
Further, a dealer is wise to use a stapler for:
-"continuation sheets".....used when the transfer is for more than three allowed in Section A.
-Multiple Sale forms.....used when the same buyer receives more than one handgun from that dealer in any five of the dealers business days.
-Written Statement.....for firearms transferred to a trust, corp, etc. the person taking possession fills one out.

I'll staple one of those items nearly every day.
 
Sometimes, one should just carefully read an OP for context. I didn't claim that the federal government maintains a formal national gun registry. Because that would be against the law, right?

But the fact remains that it does maintain records of a billion firearms sales. In a database that is searchable by serial number.

Now, it may not be efficient, this system, but it does provide for traces to an individual firearm's first owner and sometimes subsequent disposition/sales of that firearm.

Whatever the government has, whatever the government calls it, if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck...

https://www.nraila.org/articles/20220207/growing-atf-database-prompts-fears-of-gun-registry

The last I knew, at least 11 states had formal firearms registration, with pushes in several other states, and on the federal level, to incorporate registration.

Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages ·
reg·is·try
/ˈrejəstrē/
noun
noun: registry; plural noun: registries
1.
a place or office where registers or records are kept.
"MI5 maintains a large registry of files on individuals and organizations"
an official list or register.

or

Registry​

noun

reg·is·try ˈre-jə-strē

plural registries
Synonyms of registry
1
: REGISTRATION, ENROLLMENT

2
: the nationality of a ship according to its entry in a register : FLAG

3
: a place of registration

4
a
: an official record book
b
: an entry in a registry

registry

or

noun


Definition of registry
1
as in list
a record of a series of items (as names or titles) usually arranged according to some system got a copy of the couple's bridal registry from the store's computer and scanned it for items we could afford
Synonyms & Similar Words
Relevance


 
Anyone with a smidge of experience with human nature knows with a very very high degree of surety that retaining data in whatever form from whatever source, is.... human nature.

Hey, let's not BS ourselves by assuming that 4473s are safely kept in the dealer's back room. When he closes shop, it will go to da goobermink anyhow.

Even though you may no longer have a specific 4473 firearm and who the heck knows where it is now, you are registered.

Let me repeat that: You are registered.

Terry said that.
 
Until very recently (4/11/2022), the Form 4473 retention requirement was 20 years. After that, they could be destroyed. If an FFL went out of business, he was required to turn over all Form 4473 records that had not gone past 20 years.
I wonder what the percentage of FFL's decided to just discard their records. For all you guys that have been purchasing guns for 20+ years, I'm sure a majority of you would just as well hope that your transactional data wasn't being stored by the agency. I know I would be one of them, not for any nefarious reason but just just to maintain a buffer of privacy. You think most destroyed or passed it on?
 
Sometimes, one should just carefully read an OP for context.
To be honest, the OP is just a link to a YouTuber who completely misunderstands what Dettlebach is trying to explain.
Your comments are third hand.


I didn't claim that the federal government maintains a formal national gun registry. Because that would be against the law, right?
I don't think anyone said you did.


But the fact remains that it does maintain records of a billion firearms sales. In a database that is searchable by serial number.
Again, for the billionth time........wrong.
If ATF could do a firearm trace merely by serial# they wouldn't bother with a trace involving manufacturer>distributor>dealer>consumer would they?
Thats because the firearm records they have aren't searchable.

How d I know? Because I get anywhere from 10-20 traces a year.


Now, it may not be efficient, this system, but it does provide for traces to an individual firearm's first owner and sometimes subsequent disposition/sales of that firearm.
That's not a registry, thats ATF NTC contacting several different businesses and ultimately a consumer regarding a firearm. If it was searchable by serial # PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THEY CONTACT ANYONE EXCEPT FOR THAT CONSUMER.


Whatever the government has, whatever the government calls it, if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck...
Except when the government doesn't have a duck. The dealer has that duck. The buyer may no longer have a duck.


The last I knew, at least 11 states had formal firearms registration, with pushes in several other states, and on the federal level, to incorporate registration.
And how many of those require notification to the state every time a transfer of possession occurs.....as in UBC or Universal Background Check?






Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages ·
reg·is·try


a place or office where registers or records are kept.

"MI5 maintains a large registry of files on individuals and organizations"

an official list or register.
See that bolded text?
That "place or office" is one of my bedrooms. :)
If you are worried about those out of business records? They are decades old. Literally worthless for any reason.
 
AI is making searching and sorting complex databases nearly instantaneous now so efficiency probably won't be a big deal for long.
 
Anyone with a smidge of experience with human nature knows with a very very high degree of surety that retaining data in whatever form from whatever source, is.... human nature.

Hey, let's not BS ourselves by assuming that 4473s are safely kept in the dealer's back room. When he closes shop, it will go to da goobermink anyhow.

Even though you may no longer have a specific 4473 firearm and who the heck knows where it is now, you are registered.

Let me repeat that: You are registered.

Terry said that.
Let me repeat..... a Form 4473 is a Firearm Transaction Record. Period.
NOTHING about that form "registers" anything to your name permanantly. It records that sale, that day, to that buyer.
If you sell/trade/gift that gun tomorrow, no federal law requires you to notify anyone.

In a stste with gun registration, it would.
 
I wonder what the percentage of FFL's decided to just discard their records. For all you guys that have been purchasing guns for 20+ years, I'm sure a majority of you would just as well hope that your transactional data wasn't being stored by the agency. I know I would be one of them, not for any nefarious reason but just just to maintain a buffer of privacy. You think most destroyed or passed it on?
If an FFL discarded any of his records before they were twenty years old, he committed a federal felony. Not only would he lose his FFL but he wouldn't own any guns ever again.
 
If an FFL discarded any of his records before they were twenty years old, he committed a federal felony. Not only would he lose his FFL but he wouldn't own any guns ever again.
I thought I implied specifically, for those with records going back 20+ years. As in how many FFL's with records going back to 2002 and prior, discarded the files as opposed to passed them along for potential cataloging by the agency..... maybe I wasn't clear on that point.
 
I thought I implied specifically, for those with records going back 20+ years. As in how many FFL's with records going back to 2002 and prior, discarded the files as opposed to passed them along for potential cataloging by the agency..... maybe I wasn't clear on that point.
No idea. But if the dealer did any kind of volume it's pretty likely he was eagerly awaiting that 20 year mark.
I've been an FFL for fifteen years and when I dropped my 01 for an 07 after thirteen years I had twenty bankers boxes jam packed with 4473's. Those filled two five drawer later file cabinets. I'm a kitchen table dealer, I would expect a retail store to do 10X the forms I do.

A year and nine months later they still haven't made it to West Virginia, sitting here in storage in Dallas. How do I know? ATF NTC still calls me for traces on records I no longer have, that ATF Dallas actually has.

Thats why this is funny. All these guys thinking Oh noes! Databases! Registry!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top