Numbers for Class III

I spent like 10 minutes looking for those.
You wasted your time. AGAIN, those articles don't prove your point. In fact they refute it.:rofl:

The government allowed it to happen.
So, when a home or car is burglarized....you believe the owner is responsible for arming the thief?

I can't find anything saying "_______ laws were passed, then when those didn't work the 1934 gun control act was passed". The government went straight to extreme measures.
Allowing criminals to steal machine guns was a means to an end.
You really think theft was legal in 1932? o_O

The government didn't arm the taliban either after the botched Afghanistan pull out, the terrorists "stole them"...
The two situations are not at all similar and you know that.
Theft from the government vs arms the US abandoned when they withdrew from Afghanistan. And YES, that WAS the US government arming the terrorists.



It just seems like the government is really good at getting machine guns into in the hands of the last people on earth who should have them.
I get your hate for the government, I'm not questioning that. What is flat out factually incorrect is your assertion that the government armed criminals in 1932 purposly to create the National Firearms Act in 1934. Thats not just factually false, but downright silly.

You are letting your hatred of "the government" cloud the facts. Thats wrong.
 
Back
Top