Panzerschwein
member
I'm seeing some refer to them as "jam-o-matic" and others are very reliable and low maintenance.
#feelingconfused
#feelingconfused
I do not plan to scope it. Irons only, that goes for all of my firearms.IMO not worth it. In high school in the early '70's a buddy had one with a scope. In early '80's, I had a Brazilian copy.
Neither would hold zero. In fact, holding them "tight" to sand bags, would cause the entire rifle to warp, shifting impact point.
I took the scope off, and under most conditions, the gun would shoot well enough for its intended purposes, shooting squirrels, pigeons, and such. I carried it in my patrol truck for dispatching road-hit deer or (suspected) rabid skunks, raccoons, ect. Until we were issued Rem 870's.
A Savage M60?, or Ruger 10/22 are significantly better and cheaper.
Biggest problem will be finding .22 ammo.
They built their reputation on reliability...but for $400 I could buy two brand new reliable rifles with parts support.So if one were to find one in good shape, could one expect it to probably not jam a lot?
Very nice to hear. Yes Cabelas is my LGS.Oh...Cabela's was your LGS. That explains the price. . .
My brother has one given to him by our late dad. We took it out one day and it wasnt feeding properly nor ejecting the correct way either. It was jamming for sure and not to the tune of a Jamaican Rock Star. I took one look at it and exclaimed good lord when is the last time you cleaned it? Took it home and went to work with the Hopps and brake cleaner on the action and feeding mechanisms. Got it nice and shiny and handed it back to my brother a couple days later. Told him next time I have to clean it I was keeping it. It runs like a champ and is decades old. Turns out he had only been running patches down the barrel and had not taken it apart in over 10 years.
He had them for $13. He told me I was the first person he could remember to ask for parts for a Nylon 66.
wow I am surprised at the price my uncle had one of those things it was a jam-o-matic.