RWMC
Member
A friend of mine has one for sale.
According to the date code, it was made in 1970.
Not for sure who did it, but a previous owner tried their skills at making the gun look “antique”. No bluing is left on the gun anywhere but there are plenty of nicks scratches and pit marks on the outside of the barrel and cylinder. The inside of the barrel and the chambers of the cylinder are free of pits or corrosion, so it appears it should shoot well. But right now, the hammer will not stay back in it’s locked to full cocked position, so something on the inside (possibly a trigger and the related spring) is possibly broken.
My friend is asking only $25 less for this revolver that was made in 1970, than what it would cost me to buy a brand new Uberti 61 Navy. Thought about just offering him $200 For his antique, non-functioning Uberti. Am I in the proper ballpark with this offer?
According to the date code, it was made in 1970.
Not for sure who did it, but a previous owner tried their skills at making the gun look “antique”. No bluing is left on the gun anywhere but there are plenty of nicks scratches and pit marks on the outside of the barrel and cylinder. The inside of the barrel and the chambers of the cylinder are free of pits or corrosion, so it appears it should shoot well. But right now, the hammer will not stay back in it’s locked to full cocked position, so something on the inside (possibly a trigger and the related spring) is possibly broken.
My friend is asking only $25 less for this revolver that was made in 1970, than what it would cost me to buy a brand new Uberti 61 Navy. Thought about just offering him $200 For his antique, non-functioning Uberti. Am I in the proper ballpark with this offer?