Fella's;
A couple of other recent threads prompt this one. Many of us decry the .22 ammo situation in our LGS's, and rightfully so I think. Others say you can buy it anytime you want, online, if you're willing to pay the price - and the shipping.
Now I can understand why the locally owned one or three man store doesn't have it, he doesn't have enough volume to warrant his wholesaler's attention. But, lets take the larger LGS's who don't normally have .22 ammo on hand either. I'm referring to chains like Scheels - 24 stores, and Big R - 99 stores. They can order the volume, and when they get ammo, it sells out rapidly. I'm very sure that the membership here can name several other examples of this type of chain gun shop, can ya say Cabela's? When they do get .22 ammo in, it's frequently of an odd brand or type also. OTOH, the online retailers seem to be able to supply a much broader range of both manufacturer's and types within a manufacturer's range, albeit at a price.
Why the discrepancy I wonder? Surely the Big R chain can place an order as large, or larger, than Bucksnot's On-line Bullet Barn. Why do the on-liner's seem to be getting supply preference? In fact, I'm willing to place a small wager that if CCI, for instance, were to try to fill all of Big R's unfilled orders for the last decade, nobody else would see any of their production. Yes, yes, I know, CCI makes 4 million rounds a day 24/7 and that's a lot. But, there's an even larger number of unfilled and/or cancelled back orders in the last decade from all wholesaler's serving storefront retailers. Why are these operations taking a back seat to on-line?
Can't be volume, that doesn't wash when looked at in the light of cold reason. There's no reason the wholesale/retail ammo supplier's money isn't just as good as ole Bucksnot's either. If it for some reason it isn't, then there's these discrimination laws that should be applied. Or, have the traditional ammunition wholesaler's started their own on-line sales points? There I can see the incentive, after all, why supply the LGS competition? But, I'd think the restraint-of-trade regulations, the aforementioned discrimination laws, and probably a few other points of law would prevent that situation from occurring.
To me, it would seem that skulduggery is in play. The problem is that good skulduggery is, of course, not self-evident to those being fleeced. It would indeed be interesting to see the contracts between the major domestic rimfire manufacturer's and their client base.
900F
A couple of other recent threads prompt this one. Many of us decry the .22 ammo situation in our LGS's, and rightfully so I think. Others say you can buy it anytime you want, online, if you're willing to pay the price - and the shipping.
Now I can understand why the locally owned one or three man store doesn't have it, he doesn't have enough volume to warrant his wholesaler's attention. But, lets take the larger LGS's who don't normally have .22 ammo on hand either. I'm referring to chains like Scheels - 24 stores, and Big R - 99 stores. They can order the volume, and when they get ammo, it sells out rapidly. I'm very sure that the membership here can name several other examples of this type of chain gun shop, can ya say Cabela's? When they do get .22 ammo in, it's frequently of an odd brand or type also. OTOH, the online retailers seem to be able to supply a much broader range of both manufacturer's and types within a manufacturer's range, albeit at a price.
Why the discrepancy I wonder? Surely the Big R chain can place an order as large, or larger, than Bucksnot's On-line Bullet Barn. Why do the on-liner's seem to be getting supply preference? In fact, I'm willing to place a small wager that if CCI, for instance, were to try to fill all of Big R's unfilled orders for the last decade, nobody else would see any of their production. Yes, yes, I know, CCI makes 4 million rounds a day 24/7 and that's a lot. But, there's an even larger number of unfilled and/or cancelled back orders in the last decade from all wholesaler's serving storefront retailers. Why are these operations taking a back seat to on-line?
Can't be volume, that doesn't wash when looked at in the light of cold reason. There's no reason the wholesale/retail ammo supplier's money isn't just as good as ole Bucksnot's either. If it for some reason it isn't, then there's these discrimination laws that should be applied. Or, have the traditional ammunition wholesaler's started their own on-line sales points? There I can see the incentive, after all, why supply the LGS competition? But, I'd think the restraint-of-trade regulations, the aforementioned discrimination laws, and probably a few other points of law would prevent that situation from occurring.
To me, it would seem that skulduggery is in play. The problem is that good skulduggery is, of course, not self-evident to those being fleeced. It would indeed be interesting to see the contracts between the major domestic rimfire manufacturer's and their client base.
900F
Last edited: