Professor calls cops on student

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wish that would happen to me. I mean who can turn down a lawsuit like that:D. That teacher had better hope she doesn't get hammered big time for a false accusation and slander. I for one am against frivolous lawsuits but I would have her job and barred from teaching. But im at a college were I give speeches like that the professor agrees with me so that problem doesn't exist in my neck of the woods.

At minimum the teacher should lose her job.
 
Did anyone catch this? 3rd Paragraph in the article:

Article said:
Shortly after his professor, Paula Anderson, filed a complaint with the CCSU Police against her student. During the presentation Wahlberg made the point that if students were permitted to conceal carry guns on campus, the violence could have been stopped earlier in many of these cases. He also touched on the controversial idea of free gun zones on college campuses.

Free gun zones? WOOHOO! :D I'm tired of saving up for my guns.
 
Hmmm. THe Prof files a complaint asserting to the Policeman that if Guns were allowed IN HER CLASS.... there would be no butchery wanton murder and no problem....

But yet SHE has a problem with ONE student?

Please dont get me started on Susiero....
 
Let's not even notice the obvious fact that the campus police broke the law, and refuse to comment because of it. If they handled this situation properly and legally, they would have happily commented.
 
All I can think of is my inlaws. Father in law was a career college professor, retired and living on campus at an extremely liberal university. When you talk to either of the couple, it is clear they are detached and living in academic disneyland. For them the real world doesn't exist. The disconnect is actually frightening at times. And for them everyone is either a professor or a student (anyone not a professor is automatically thought of at the level of a student-even if they are 40 years old and have never been in a college). They have no concept of people who don't have degrees and are successful. For them those people don't exist. They are also the type of people who go out to dinner with others and make a big show of not being happy with the service, table, food, etc. They think it impresses people, but in my case, I feel embarrassed and sorry for the overworked waitresses and staff. How my wife and her siblings turned out to be decent, hardworking people who are fun to be around is beyond me. As for them, I gave them up a long time ago as a lost cause. Their heads would explode if they saw the inside of my safe, or watched their daughter/my wife shooting.
 
I dont want to pick on College in general. But I find myself in a College event hosted by a Faculty for some kind of function I ceased to recall long ago.

When I realized the astounding amount of bull, ego stroking and other fondling sweetnothings designed to puff these peacocks up even further in thier sense of vital importance to the Students I walked out.

I rather be inside a truck stop hammering out with 5 other drivers how to handle a problem spouse on the telephone who needs to get money from 2000 miles away.
 
That professor should be fired, not for being against guns, but for attempting to limit the free exchange of ideas in his classroom. That is unacceptable.

I gave a similar presentation for my final speech in public speaking, and even though my professor was less than thrilled with the topic, she was at least willing to listen to my arguments and allowed the class to discuss the speech openly with me. I was actually surprised at the number of students in the audience that agreed with my position.
 
Let's not even notice the obvious fact that the campus police broke the law, and refuse to comment because of it.


what law do you imagine was broken?
 
Well, I doubt they really have legal access to the info about what this guy has. They are guilty of harassment, and they had no just cause to even call upon him. If the police could legally "question" you just because someone claims you made others uncomfortable, then I'm gonna call them about newscasters, weathermen, and politicians. By that standard, one could be subject to arrest because I said they made you uncomfortable.
 
" Susie
February 27, 2009 • 7:04 pm

As a student at CCSU i am deeply concerned. I do not agree with Wahlberg and I believe he should be put in prison for saying such things. When someone speaks of promoting guns they are promoting MURDER and should be punished. I’m all for free speech, just not when it comes to guns."

This is the second time this week I've heard someone arguing passionately for legal sanctions against people for holding opinions different than their own. When did human life become so cheap in the United States?
 
I emailed her.

Hello

A simpleton, or a gun hating fear monger. Which is it? Scared because someone in your class talked about real life campus violence and how the owning & carrying of guns by law abiding citizens helps reduce crime. How about getting tough on criminals and not harrasing law abiding Americans for a change. Thanks, AC

I was nice, asked a simple question, and made a reasonable request. It fell on deaf ears I am sure. :)
 
with the amount of college bashing on here it seems that you all would feel more comfortable without a university system at all
 
was he arrested?

I doubt they really have legal access to the info about what this guy has

really? how do you figure that?



how do you figure they harassed him?


the cops, or anyone else, can ask anything they want up to you about answering. good luck with your plan about the newscasters weathermen and politiciuans post how that works out.

i don't see where he was arrested.... do you have info i don't?

now the teacher he might be able to jack up but i doubt it
 
I hope the student looks into suing the prof & University for violating his civil rights.

Also pulled this comment from the paper. LOL!! Be sure to read the whole thing:


Comment on Professor Called Police After Student Presentation by jack burton
Saturday, February 28, 2009 5:28 PM
The Professor was entirely correct in her decision.

Guns owners are disrespectful of authority. A failure to rely on authorities is an invariable sign of improper and overly independent attitudes. The mere fact that they gather together to talk about guns at gun shops, gun shows, and shooting ranges means that they have some plot going against us normal people. A gun owner has no right to associate with another gun owner.

Therefore, to help ensure our right to happiness and safety we must ban and seize all guns from private hands, and forbid NRA-based criticism towards people who are only trying to help. Searching the homes of all NRA members and seizing their guns will go a long way towards reducing crime.

If we need help doing this we can invite people like the Australians and Norweigans to help rummage through people's property.

People who don't like this prove they are on the side of the killers with the guns and should be put in jail along side all the gangbangers and other gun nuts. Letting them sit in jail for a few years before they are charged will give the government plenty of time to find something wrong in their lives. Anything they say, write, or express should be held against them to prove their guilt.

Common sense requires only uniformed soldiers, police, and other agents of the state have access to firearms and no person should be able to challenge this by writing to Congress or the President. If they do they should be forced in court to admit to it and then fined a hundred million dollars for each time. Subjecting them to torture will probably change their minds.

No woman needs to protect herself from rape, assault or murder and should just leave crime prevention to the Police who are properly equipped to investigate following the crime's completion. Women using a gun in self-defense interferes with and makes the attempted crime a "non-event," which unnecessarily complicates the Police investigation. Any woman who does this should be put in jail for interfering with an investigation.

If someone still really, really thinks they have a need for a gun in their home for protection then the Army should just force them to host and feed some armed soldiers.

Those who claim that the 2nd amendment was given to because we might someday need guns to use against an oppressive government forget that Constitution has strong internal safeguards to protect our freedoms. So there!

Long live our Constitution!
 
It has come to my attention that many people honestly dont know how to present things. You want to speak of guns, death, religion etc or any other issue that is touchy?

1. gauge your professor. If you cannot agree with his/her views (even if that means just writing nonsense for a grade) avoid the topic altogether, or you will pay for it

2. pick some far away land. Plenty of disturbed regions offer nice bases for case studies. This way you talk about the same things you always wanted but the focus is no longer "me you my neighbors and that cop over there" but some refugees and famined rebels in who knows where.

Worked for me all these years.
 
I'm appalled - I just emailed that Prof:

Professor Anderson,

I just came across the story about Mr. Wahlberg and your reporting of him to the
campus police for his presentation in your class regarding firearms. I have to
admit I am baffled. From my understanding, he was arguing why allowing
students to carry guns on campus could prevent violence such as what happened
at Virginia Tech. I didn't think that he was actually carrying firearms at
that time in violation of any school policy or state law, or that you had any
reason to believe that he was. Isn't what he did the proper and accepted way
of presenting his opinion? Non-violent, intelligent conversation? Isn't this
what college in general encourages? Doesn't the First Amendment protect speech
about the Second Amendment? I was always taught (from my liberal parents) that
being an American means that even though you don't like what someone else says,
you should always defend his right to say it - even if it makes other people
uncomfortable.

I am disappointed that our educators have failed America.
 
How long will it take to process and finish Recruit training and graduate those tens of thousands of able bodied fighting age unemployeds and ship them to service of the Nation?
 
When the campus police asked "where I stored my firearms", I'd have told them, "That's none of your business, and unless you have a warrant, I'm leaving."
 
The article, in case it goes offline:
Professor Called Police After Student Presentation
Posted by admin on 2/24/09 • Categorized as News

For CCSU student John Wahlberg, a class presentation on campus violence turned into a confrontation with the campus police due to a complaint by the professor.

On October 3, 2008, Wahlberg and two other classmates prepared to give an oral presentation for a Communication 140 class that was required to discuss a “relevant issue in the media”. Wahlberg and his group chose to discuss school violence due to recent events such as the Virginia Tech shootings that occurred in 2007.

Shortly after his professor, Paula Anderson, filed a complaint with the CCSU Police against her student. During the presentation Wahlberg made the point that if students were permitted to conceal carry guns on campus, the violence could have been stopped earlier in many of these cases. He also touched on the controversial idea of free gun zones on college campuses.

That night at work, Wahlberg received a message stating that the campus police “requested his presence”. Upon entering the police station, the officers began to list off firearms that were registered under his name, and questioned him about where he kept them.

They told Wahlberg that they had received a complaint from his professor that his presentation was making students feel “scared and uncomfortable”.

“I was a bit nervous when I walked into the police station,” Wahlberg said, “but I felt a general sense of disbelief once the officer actually began to list the firearms registered in my name. I was never worried however, because as a law-abiding gun owner, I have a thorough understanding of state gun laws as well as unwavering safety practices.”

Professor Anderson refused to comment directly on the situation and deferred further comment.

“It is also my responsibility as a teacher to protect the well being of our students, and the campus community at all times,” she wrote in a statement submitted to The Recorder. “As such, when deemed necessary because of any perceived risks, I seek guidance and consultation from the Chair of my Department, the Dean and any relevant University officials.”

Wahlberg believes that her complaint was filed without good reason.

“I don’t think that Professor Anderson was justified in calling the CCSU police over a clearly nonthreatening matter. Although the topic of discussion may have made a few individuals uncomfortable, there was no need to label me as a threat,” Wahlberg said in response. “The actions of Professor Anderson made me so uncomfortable, that I didn’t attend several classes. The only appropriate action taken by the Professor was to excuse my absences.”
 
Hmmm. An unwarranted denial of the right of free speech, with the clear threat of an impact on a student's grades, then intimidation and harassment, plus more threats, by the police.

A lot of lawyers will love this one. Unfortunately, the taxpayers of CT might not.

Jim
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top