Proposed OSHA edict

Status
Not open for further replies.

mec

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2002
Messages
4,588
This could have a profound effect on availability of any and all loading components/black powder/substitutes and percussion caps. Basically, The Occupational Health and Safety Soviet has determined that it has jurisdiction over work safety issues related to explosives. They appear to be lumping all propellents, ammunition primers as explosives of one sort or another and considering regulations that would limit the amount of such things that can be displayed in a retail store or shipped.
People are responding by entering comments somewhere on this site
http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=FEDERAL_REGISTER&p_id=19509
or contacting their elected representatives.

This is the sort of thing that has been shot down quickly by responsive legislators in the past. It's a bit more dicey now that we have a leftist legislature.
 
I empathise and sympathise wholeheartedly with you folks in the States. We have been going through this for years. The latest legislation rumour here is to limit the purchase of primers to Firearms Certificate holders only. The EU is even considering bringing in legislation minimising the use of lead!!! – just when I have bought my first smelter and bullet moulds!:mad:
 
The EU is even considering bringing in legislation minimising the use of lead!!!

We had that brewing back when Hilliary was in power the first time. She was wanting to eliminate "Environmental!!!! Lead" and had her dagger drawn on bullets and fishing weights.
 
we are getting very close to the point

of having to decide wether or not to fish or cut bait.... This is just one attack.

Check this:
"If you’re an American reading this, then under expansive definitions being used by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and several states in their counterterrorism training, you just might be a domestic terrorist.

The FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force in Phoenix, Ariz., distributed a brochure (Images: 1, 2) to local law enforcement agencies a few years ago which defines terrorism as individuals or groups within the U.S. who engage in criminal activity to promote political or social changes. This is correct, as far as it goes, but the brochure then gives a listing of “suspicious” activities, telling law enforcement officers: “If you encounter any of the following, call the Joint Terrorism Task Force.”

Some of the things for which you should be reported as a suspected terrorist include the usual things, like weapons of mass destruction, and hate groups such as the Ku Klux Klan and Neo-Nazis, but also includes people who “Make numerous references to US Constitution,” “Claim driving is a right, not a privilege” and “Attempt to ‘police the police.’”

In addition, “People whose political motivation is usually Marxist/Leninist philosophy,” “‘defenders’ of the US Constitution against federal government and the UN,” computer hackers, and “Lone Individuals” should also be reported.

Do you fall under any of those categories? I certainly do; more than one, in fact. So I’m probably under suspicion somewhere as a domestic terrorist.

Last week, the state of Alabama Department of Homeland Security got scrutinized for an interactive terrorism awareness training section of its Web site, which said much the same things. The bureaucrats removed the entire training after it wound up on digg.com, a popular Web site where users can promote news to the site’s front page.

In Alabama, it seems, promoting gun rights can also get you branded a domestic terrorist.

Alabama’s site was based on a similar one from the state of Pennsylvania, which in addition to all of the above, says that promoting jury nullification, secession, or the belief that all governments must ultimately become corrupted by power also makes you a domestic terrorist worth watching.

But it gets worse.

But you see, I once read Unintended Consequences and was quite impressed with the book. Then one day I attended a FBI security briefing for technology security and was confronted with an image of the book — strongly implying those who own or read the book were terrorists.

But now I find I’m considered a terrorist by many other government agencies! Seriously, I wonder when I shall be arrested and “Detained.” . . .

The state of Virginia also says I’m a terrorist. (PDF) Why there? Because I’m a “property rights advocate.” Seriously, in Virginia, you’re a TERRORIST if you advocate for property rights. I think they’re going to need to build more jails to house us all. . . .

Incredibly, none of this is in jest. These various government agencies honestly believe *I* am a “domestic terrorist.” That is so sad. Indeed, this once-great country has nowhere to go but down." — Ogre’s Politics & Views

The hot links did not copy for some reason - here is the thread where I saw this: http://www.gunsnet.net/forums/showthread.php?t=314597

Add these to the "immigration reform" bill and other abuses already in place and we are heading down the slippery slope very quickly IMHO.

Hard to believe.

The one encouraging thing is that people are reacting - the immigration bill was quashed - much to the whinning and hand wringing of our so-called representatives. I hope they "get it".

mec - thank you for posting - I will copy that to other forums - this is how we combat this crap - communicate and coordinate.
 
“People whose political motivation is usually Marxist/Leninist philosophy,”
Amazing! That takes in most of the congress and the major news networks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top