I was reading over at Of Arms & the Law about a pending case in Maryland over their carry permits. In looking at the Maryland permit application, I noticed that it includes
"I agree to indemnify and hold harmless the person to whom this request is presented and his agents and employees, from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees arising out of or by reason of complying with this request."
Setting aside all the other civil rights issues, is it legal for a state agency to require indemnification as part of an application? It seems to be a catch 22 situation: Maryland is going after Williams for not applying for a permit, and if a citizen applies for a permit and is turned down, he's agreed not to contest the decision.
"I agree to indemnify and hold harmless the person to whom this request is presented and his agents and employees, from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees arising out of or by reason of complying with this request."
Setting aside all the other civil rights issues, is it legal for a state agency to require indemnification as part of an application? It seems to be a catch 22 situation: Maryland is going after Williams for not applying for a permit, and if a citizen applies for a permit and is turned down, he's agreed not to contest the decision.