Appreciate everyone's replies once again.
Apologies to Geo and Hooda for causing their misunderstanding. Hey, it's me doing not, not either one of you!
But I will tickle this some more for everyone's entertainment
I get it: we are dealing with already dangerous items, by chambering something from the bin, why multiply the risks, especially if the risks can stack to an inappropriate (mistakenly or intentionally hot) load in a weak firearm. Do this enough times and something may/will happen.
But I have to ask you all, reloaders - "my ammo only" line of thought, is that taking it a bit too far?
Think of a field situation (use imagination), or (hope not) an emergency situation.
Would you accept something from a friend or a stranger?
Would you pick up something that sat somewhere for an unknown amount of time, but you had to use it.
Who wouldn't, no?
And if not, what are some of external signs that would prevent you from contemplating use of a common caliber even in a field or an emergency setting.
Comments please
Appreciate everyone's replies once again.
Apologies to Geo and Hooda for causing their misunderstanding. Hey, it's me doing not, not either one of you!
But I will tickle this some more for everyone's entertainment
I get it: we are dealing with already dangerous items, by chambering something from the bin, why multiply the risks, especially if the risks can stack to an inappropriate (mistakenly or intentionally hot) load in a weak firearm. Do this enough times and something may/will happen.
But I have to ask you all, reloaders - "my ammo only" line of thought, is that taking it a bit too far?
Think of a field situation (use imagination), or (hope not) an emergency situation.
Would you accept something from a friend or a stranger?
Would you pick up something that sat somewhere for an unknown amount of time, but you had to use it.
Who wouldn't, no?
And if not, what are some of external signs that would prevent you from contemplating use of a common caliber even in a field or an emergency setting.
Comments please
I sort of have a reason to start reloading the - 6.5 Carcano TS. My understanding is the correctly weighted, bullet-sized and loaded ammo commercially does not exist right now. I would like to see how the original sights do with the correct load. Have not seen any surplus ever since I was so late to owning it relatively the time it was around, but even if found, ya'll concerns would make me think twice shooting itI am another guy who will not shoot randomly found cartridges in my guns. IMHO there is a reason that round has been discarded, so I prefer not to be the guinea pig who touches off random 30-60k psi cartridges an inch past my nose. Lord forbid some jackhole purposely overloads a round and tosses it on the ground to be “funny”. IMHO, that’s an intentional act of sabotage that could be permanently disfiguring or even fatal.
Others may see no problem with picking up discards and shooting them. IMHO, its your gun, your fingers, your face. What you do with them is entirely up to you.
OP, hopefully someday you will start reloading. It is a satisfying hobby that starts with a desired outcome, then blends a lot of physics, geometry, and other sciences with your attention to detail. The goal is to create safe load(s) that meet your desires. Its not true rocket science, but lax practices or inattention can easily result in ugliness to your guns or extremities.
I have been asked to load cartridges for others. I recall one was a .44 Special load a friend needed for his CCW qual, .44 Spl was nowhere to be found so I put together a nice target load and he qualified.
Another loading request I literally just completed. A buddy bought a sweet S&W 52-2 that he wasn’t able to source .38 Spl target wadcutter loads to feed it. I just completed a batch of 2.8 gr Bullseye and a lead WC for him. (That is a special gun, load charges were double-weighed on two scales to ensure more consistency.)
View attachment 1195393
Stay safe.
Yes, I was keeping the PPU brass from the available commercial load in hopes to start someday.If you can find the brass and the bullets, you can load it. You may have to get a mold and cast your own bullets though.
Reloading breathes new life into old and obsolete cartridges. It's an enjoyable hobby as well for a lot of people.
chris
I started saving brass way before I started reloading. It just seemed wrong to throw away brass that could be reused.Yes, I was keeping the PPU brass from the available commercial load in hopes to start someday.
I thought I'd post here since we do not have a dedicated ammunition umbrella.
This is on a lighter note
I've been finding myself going through the failure-to-feed, failure-to-fire discard bins at my range.
Never know what may be sitting there. Part curiosity, part demonstrating the visitors with me the calibers we do not shoot or have on hand.
Somehow I feel this is an acceptable and nobler form of garbage bin rummaging. What do you think?
You can easily visualize the difference between 5.56 and .223, or keep an interesting one for research.. and all in between.
As an aside, failures-to-fire that I could chamber that day or another never failed to fire given the second chance. Huh. I eagerly try them. Why not?
I have avoided the really crooked failures-to-feed.
Latest finds are several of Turkish 7.92 Mauser from the 40s (I will try to fire them, I've read they are hot, corrosive and have spotty reliability) and a 7.62x54R silvertip that is just asking for country and date of origin research.
A an incendiary and provocative question for the ammunition experts here
Could you think of calibers found in the discard bin that from the looks could lead you to a snap mistake of believing you can chamber and fire it that day or next in one of your firearms - and in reality are not compatible, but may chamber without alarming you, or, worse, fire, potentially creating a hazard.
Please list the dangerously-close-but-incompatible calibers and, respectively, chambers you own!
"There can be some pretty cool stuff to be found" - this made me start looking, caliber, case bullet interest. And there was just one step from there to chambering and firing.I ain't not firin' no mystery ammo scavenged from the depths of obscurity.
Period, end of story.
I might look to see what there is to see, but that's it. There can be some pretty cool stuff to be found.
But chamber it in any of my guns?
Nope.
Well, the answer is found in the many pictures and stories of the shattered, busted, and broken rifles and bloody faces in those photos.I am sure you've read it all. Mosins, Mausers, SKS and 7.62x39 discards - strong, overbuilt actions, takes some real effort to blow up. More like unreal. Right? Or not. You tell me. And even .223/.556 - given lack of of awareness of the collective wisdom here, I was more-or-less, let's send it - Amralite HBAR, what the worst that can happen?
Could someone elaborate on the cold welding phenomenon? Bullet becomes fused to the case from age?
Chief,Cold welding requires four things:
1. Similar metals
"There can be some pretty cool stuff to be found" - this made me start looking, caliber, case bullet interest. And there was just one step from there to chambering and firing.
In my defense - for everyone here - everything so far has been WW1-WW2 cartridges with an occasional .223/.556. No handgun bins yet.
I am sure you've read it all. Mosins, Mausers, SKS and 7.62x39 discards - strong, overbuilt actions, takes some real effort to blow up. More like unreal. Right? Or not. You tell me. And even .223/.556 - given lack of of awareness of the collective wisdom here, I was more-or-less, let's send it - Amralite HBAR, what the worst that can happen?
One thing for sure - I won't contemplate doing this to anything outside of mil-surp. And most likely none now, at least not without real hand and eyes protection.
Chief,
Would it be similar or dissimilar metals, as in bullet jacket and cartridge brass?
Or more likely, I'm borrowing a term and using it very loosely.
But, some of the older cartridges with the cupronickel jackets were notorious for sticking (welding?) to the case necks.
I believe you are describing the industrial process of cold welding, rather than the phenomenon first observed in ammunition with early jacketed ammunition for the Springfield rifle that contained tin in the jacket.Cold welding requires four things:
1. Similar metals
2. Clean metal surfaces (no contaminants/oxides)
3. Vacuum
4. Contact between the two metal pieces (and typically significant pressure is involved)
Items 2 and 3 don't exist in the case of bullets in a case. Sometimes item one doesn't exist, either, in the case of unjacketed lead bullets. What you get is corrosion, or oxides, which may interact to cause them to "stick" together, but not on an atomic level like cold welding.
Wikipedia is pretty good on explaining this:
Cold welding - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I believe you are describing the industrial process of cold welding, rather than the phenomenon first observed in ammunition with early jacketed ammunition for the Springfield rifle that contained tin in the jacket.
In ammunition terms, "cold welding" is an admittedly imprecise term used to describe bonding of bullet jackets to case necks through various processes including galvanic action, corrosion and other things better understood by metallurgists.