Range Report Taurus 605 CIA .357 Snub

Status
Not open for further replies.

orangeninja

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2003
Messages
3,117
Quick Correction. The title says the Taurus 605 when it is actually the Taurus 650. Sorry about that.

Well I just came back fresh from the range with a brand new Taurus 650B CIA (the “B” meaning blue steel) .357 magnum.

The Gun

A basic no frills job in blue steel weighing about 24 ounces with 5 shot capacity on a J-frame. It is hammerless with one of the Taurus safety locks just above the grips and out of the way above the back strap so as I never once noticed it while shooting. The grips are the standard rubber pebble grips from Taurus and will soon be replaced with Pachmyer or Hogues as the factory grips have a rough seam down the front that gets irritating during shooting. The front sight is of course a fixed blade style sight and functions well for what it is.

The Ammo

A mixed bag of .357 Mag Golden Sabers and Hydrashocks both 125gr. And a couple of heavy 158 gr. Hydrashocks from WAY back (about 10 years old or more).

The Range

Indoor climate controlled well lit with the target being a standard silhouette style and a basic target with 3 inch bulls-eye. Shooting was between 15 and 20 feet (it is a snub after all). All shooting was done off hand with 2 slow deliberate 5 shot strings along with several quick 5 shot strings.

The Rest of the Story

So I load up this little unassuming monster, gun-snobs casting nary a glance at my little Taurus as they fire off their Colt’s, Glocks and Sigs around me. I plop 5 Golden Sabers into the gun, take aim and squeeze the trigger. The trigger is very smooth, much like the S&W revolvers that it patterns itself after; there wasn’t even a hint of grittiness.

The trigger slid smoothly back, the front blade sight on target when suddenly; “BOOM” a fire ball the size of a burning orangutan jumps out of the end of it. The concussion inside the little cubicle that surrounds the shooter was noticeable and I saw at least a couple shooters look down towards me to see what kind of fist artillery I was playing with. Surprisingly the recoil wasn’t as bad as I had anticipated (I had anticipated it to be really,really bad). Soon I was shooting controlled pairs and quick five shots. Was I rapid firing like with my Glock 17? No, but I was able to place about five shots in 3 seconds without getting outside of the 5 ring on a silhouette, not bad.

I shot the gun one handed, albeit much slower with my strong hand and I was about at my limit for recoil. I switched to the weak hand and was above my limit for recoil as my hand became quickly fatigued. At 20 feet head shots were easily accomplished with concentration. I did notice that I had a tendency to pull my shots to the right, which is probably a combination of not being used to a DAO revolver trigger, small grips and catchers mitts for hands (I have larger hands). When shooting two handed the recoil wasn’t so bad that I couldn’t have finished about 300 or so rounds in one sitting. This thing will be a real pussy cat with some .38 specials in it.

The accuracy was very acceptable, I placed multiple shots through a single ragged hole and I'm not much of a revolver shooter. The gun is more accurate than I am.

Overall given the cost of this gun and its performance I would have to say this gun gets a “best-buy” from me. Solid reliable and smooth, don’t expect any frills with the 650.

Carrying

Well I bought an equally thrifty Uncle Mikes IWB holster for this gun and dropped it right into my pants pocket. No sweat, the gun stays put, the holster breaks up the printing and it feels like I’m carrying a wad of keys around. At first I was concerned about the guns weight (prior to actually wearing it), since 24 ounces isn’t in the same neighborhood of the 12 ounce .38 special, but then I remembered that this was a magnum, not a .38. After shooting it, I was thankful for every precious ounce this gun had, but the gun balances so well, it doesn’t feel like it weighs 24 ounces. Just for a quick reference, a fully loaded Glock G26 9mm weighs about the same, give or take an ounce and I’ve never heard anyone complain about carrying a G26 as being heavy.

I’ve carried the 650 for 3 days now in my right front pocket with no trouble. I’ve even used it as a BUG to my standard Glock 23 .40 and didn’t feel like Pancho Villa. I just drop the 650 in my pocket, move all the keys, wallet, etc to my left pocket and I feel very balanced without my pants falling down and I wear my pants LOOSE like most young guys. For IWB carry the gun simply vanishes. It carries so well that the only other thing like it is a Glock G26.

The Myth of the Snub Magnum

Now I’ve been told by many gun-shop gurus that the snub magnum is just all powder flash and no velocity. That the gun simply becomes a hot .38 special at higher velocities. Upon performing a bit of research, partly through Chuck Hawks http://www.chuckhawks.com and a few other sources and have come to find that the 2 inch snub magnum is still a magnum. The .38 special coming out of a 2 inch barrel at about 950 FPS (feet per second) doesn’t even hold a candle to the .357 coming out of the same gun at 1250 FPS. Does that guarantee the venerable “one shot stop”? Of course not, shot placement, not caliber dictates that, but the magnum will do it’s thing if the shooter does his/her part and I just don’t feel like carrying a mouse gun auto when I could carry the magnum for roughly the same weight and size.

Conclusion

If you need a small but powerful pocket pistol I recommend a Taurus 650 be given at least a second look. It shoots the inexpensive .38 special target rounds, it will shoot the hottest .38 special +P or +P+ defensive rounds and if your up to it, the Holy Grail of defensive rounds, the .357 Magnum 125 gr. without undue hardship and pain on the shooter that some of the alloy frame revolvers produce. At under $300.00 (if you look), you’d be hard pressed to find better.
 

Attachments

  • 650 CIA.JPG
    650 CIA.JPG
    10.3 KB · Views: 167
a burning orangutan jumps out of the end of it

Best visual description I've seen so far. :p Thanks for the range report.

jmm
 
!

If you want to turn those burning orangutangs in blazing gorillas, try out some of Winchesters 125gr. jsp WinClean .357mags.

Out of my 6" barrel they put on quite a show so I can only imagine the fireworks you could produce.

Be advised, you WILL feel the heat off of those things. :what:
 
I felt the heat off of those 10 to 15 year old Federals. I didn't know how safe they would be to shoot so I chose to shoot them out of an inexpensive revolver....and it held to it wonderfully.

As for the burning monkey....maybe that'll be my nickname for this snubbie....

Introducing my "burning monkey". Hopefully no ladies will be around when talking about whipping out my burning monkey.:evil:
 
I just purchased a Taurus 605 stainless .357, and I am likewise pleased with it. I will second Alduro's comment that you can tuck it in a pocket and more or less ignore it--even in dress pants it doesn't ruin the line too much.
 
BowStreetRunner said:
alduro,
so you dont find it too heavy or big for pocket carry?
how big a guy are you so i can get some perspective?
thanks,
BSR

Yeah the pistol drops right in the old pocket with no trouble. I am 5'11 at 220 lbs. Not fat but not skinny, I'd say about average. I wear somewhat baggy jeans, but the gun drops in my uniform slacks just as easily. Believe it or not this thing works in the pocket pretty well.

I will try and post a pic if I swap out the grips.
 
recoil-wise the next step down will be 38sp 158gr +P LSWCHP. They won't feel like much of a pussy cat, but it might be under your limit for offhand recoil. It's still a great choice for snubbies.

BTW Here is a great source for compact and full size wood grips.
 
gazpacho said:
recoil-wise the next step down will be 38sp 158gr +P LSWCHP. They won't feel like much of a pussy cat, but it might be under your limit for offhand recoil. It's still a great choice for snubbies.

BTW Here is a great source for compact and full size wood grips.

Cool site.
 
I HAD a much better reply to this topic, til my computer went haywire and shut down...*grumble* In summation:

Great range report, and most useful for me. The CIA just narrowly lost out to the Glock 19 when I chose my "to-be" CCW gun early this year.

I'm happy to hear the trigger is smooth. The trigger on my Taurus Model 94 was a real :cuss: ....

My first winter with a CCW is coming up, making me think harder about having a coat-pocket gun that, unlike my P3AT, should be good for five shots intstead of one - maybe two if I'm reeeally lucky! :D
 
I have been very impressed with my new Taurus 851. ( basically a shrouded hammer model 85). The double action trigger pull is wonderful and I have had zero problems @ the 200 round mark.

At under $300.00 (if you look), you’d be hard pressed to find better.

+1
 
Shooting was between 15 and 20 feet (it is a snub after all).
My old Colt Detective Special doesn't seem to be aware of this limitation. It does what you did at 50 yards... and further. ;)
 
Who is going to be hunting or shooting at a moving target more than 50 yards away with a snubnose in the first place?

Snubs are designed for self defense, and I can't envision a self defense situation short of war that will require shooting at someone more than 50 yards away.
 
Who is going to be hunting or shooting at a moving target more than 50 yards away with a snubnose in the first place?

Well if you can keep your shots in a silhouette at 50 yards (or further) you shouldn't be pressed to get tight, well placed groups at 20 feet. :uhoh:

The Old Fuff has been at it for awhile, and has noticed that as cartridge power went up in popular snubbies, standards of marksmanship went down. Today's shooters seem happy to hit the broad side of a barn if they're inside and the door's closed. Perhaps if they get close enough they can incinerate the threat with their muzzle flash. :D Magnum powder doesn't do a whole lot if the bullet isn't placed where it needs to be, and even less if it misses the intended target. I don't mean to give orangeninja a bad time since he's so happy with his new gun, and frankly I sometimes carry a similar Taurus chambered in .38 Special. I don't really feel the need for a Magnum in this size platform.

That said, a man (or woman for that matter) who can down an opponent at 50 yards doesn't have to worry too much if that person's limit is 20 feet.

Do he... :evil: ;)
 
I only practice for self defense, so I don't shoot at targets further out than 48 feet. For one thing my range only goes to 48 feet. However, 99.9% of my shooting is done at 21 feet, because that is the average distance one has to shoot when they have to defend themselves. I can shred any part of the target at that distance I aim at, so I'm unconcerned how I'd do at 50 yards.
If I ever need to shoot at someone from that great a distance, I'm in really deep trouble to begin with. I don't compete so target shooting for me is self defense shooting.

At 50 yards my eyes can't even see a target much less shoot at it.
 
Panthera Tigris. Might have to if out in the woods. There have been a number of murders up here during deer season. The muderers used rifles. If that is all one has on the hike, 50 to 100 yard shots might be needed. Chances of having to take that kind of shot are remote. Mas Ayoob writes up reports in his yearly book on handguns on just this sort of thing:D . He has several positions that are steady if one wants to learn for fun or just in case the remote chance becomes reality.
 
In a time not too long ago police officers with 4" .38 revolvers qualified at ranges out to 50 yards on a course designed by the FBI, and detectives did the same at 25 yards with snubbies. Shooting started at waist level, point shooting at 7 yards (21 feet) in both cases. Occasionally the plainclothes guys would take on the 50 yard course just for grins. Now for some, 21 feet is the maximum distance they'll go to. The Old Fuff fears for the future... :D
 
The Old Fuff fears for the future...

Amen!

Todays pistol shooters vastly underestimate the capabilities of their firearms and the need to be able to shoot at longer distances.

BTDT!!!
 
It makes no difference for me. I can't even make out a target at that distance. And, I don't go out into any woods these days. There aren't any woods close to me. I'm poor, so driving any distance to hike is out of the question too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top