xXxplosive
Member
https://www.gofundme.com/donna-gracey-nj-weapon-defence
Please read this before you come to Jersey.....
Please read this before you come to Jersey.....
Hokie_PhD wrote:
My guess is that they plea a deal as the system is setup to get us to admit to “crimes” of a lower level in order to avoid jail.
Well, the problem is that New Jersey's gun laws have not been ruled unconstitutional and until that happens, they are enforceable. Ms. Gracey was carrying a concealed weapon in her car for which she did not have an appropriate permit for New Jersey. That makes her guilty of a felony. So, any plea deal she might be offered is not a device to force someone to admit to a crime in order to avoid the possibility of a harsher sentence, it is simply the operation of a set of laws that the people on this board, myself included, happen to believe are wrong.
A fish is caught only when he opens his mouth...........
Just because a law hasn’t been ruled unConstitutional doesn’t mean it is valid...
...It has been truly said, that the presumption is in favour of every legislative act, and that the whole burden of proof lies on him who denies its constitutionality....
...Due respect for the decisions of a coordinate branch of Government demands that we invalidate a congressional enactment only upon a plain showing that Congress has exceeded its constitutional bounds. See United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S., at 568, 577_578 (Kennedy, J., concurring); United States v. Harris, 106 U.S., at 635. With this presumption of constitutionality in mind, we turn to the question whether §13981 falls within Congress' power under Article I, §8, of the Constitution....