mister_murphy
Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2006
- Messages
- 104
Hello everyone...
I am writing to you today to ask for information and any legal precendence that you may know of in North Carolina regarding the recovery of a stolen gun to the legal owner, who is eligable to legally possess it, once it has been recovered by the police. Yes, we have the manufacturer's names, serial numbers, calibers, and a brief description recorded. The gun in question was inherited from our grandparents in the early 1990's, and so there is no receipt or 4473 record. the gun was purchased many years ago and was in the family all our lives until stolen.
Long story short. My brother has had some guns stolen about 2 months ago and approximatly 3 weeks ago the local police department recovered 1 of the guns during a investigation into another crime. The gun still has the manufacturer's name and the unique serial number in place and has not been altered as I understand it. The asked my brother to identify the gun and he said he could not be 100% for sure because of some scratches on the stock. Though he did say he was 90% sure it was his gun from the appearance. Evidently, the police do not want to go by the serial number for confirmation. Yes, a atf trace was inconclusive, proving more I feel that the gun was purchased before I was even born in the 70's
The true value in the gun is the heirloom status and also the fact that since it has been in our possession, we may have a legal liability if it is used in a crime. The police officer involved in the case wants to return it to the person who they found in possession of it after it was stolen. That individual has stated that he recently purchased the gun from another private party (no records).
Short of fighting a battle in court, what other ideas do you have to help with this matter? I am at a loss and my brother and I are looking for a lawyer now. Perhaps you know of a legal firm who has handled these things in the past.
We all know stolen property may have the appearance changed, etc so the serial number being recorded should be proof enough. What do you all have to say?
EDIT: No one has been charged with possession of stolen property and they are not pursuing it as far as I know.
I am writing to you today to ask for information and any legal precendence that you may know of in North Carolina regarding the recovery of a stolen gun to the legal owner, who is eligable to legally possess it, once it has been recovered by the police. Yes, we have the manufacturer's names, serial numbers, calibers, and a brief description recorded. The gun in question was inherited from our grandparents in the early 1990's, and so there is no receipt or 4473 record. the gun was purchased many years ago and was in the family all our lives until stolen.
Long story short. My brother has had some guns stolen about 2 months ago and approximatly 3 weeks ago the local police department recovered 1 of the guns during a investigation into another crime. The gun still has the manufacturer's name and the unique serial number in place and has not been altered as I understand it. The asked my brother to identify the gun and he said he could not be 100% for sure because of some scratches on the stock. Though he did say he was 90% sure it was his gun from the appearance. Evidently, the police do not want to go by the serial number for confirmation. Yes, a atf trace was inconclusive, proving more I feel that the gun was purchased before I was even born in the 70's
The true value in the gun is the heirloom status and also the fact that since it has been in our possession, we may have a legal liability if it is used in a crime. The police officer involved in the case wants to return it to the person who they found in possession of it after it was stolen. That individual has stated that he recently purchased the gun from another private party (no records).
Short of fighting a battle in court, what other ideas do you have to help with this matter? I am at a loss and my brother and I are looking for a lawyer now. Perhaps you know of a legal firm who has handled these things in the past.
We all know stolen property may have the appearance changed, etc so the serial number being recorded should be proof enough. What do you all have to say?
EDIT: No one has been charged with possession of stolen property and they are not pursuing it as far as I know.
Last edited: