.30-30 150 grain PowerPoint shot through a deer front to back. Thirty-seven inches of penetration. It went in the where the back meets the neck. I found it in the skin of the ham, half out.
They expand well, hold that shape, and penetrate well over a reasonably wide velocity range, and they do it consistently. They may not shoot the best in your rifle, but the question is do they shoot well enough for your application. For a great many people that answer is yes.
What you call "mediocrity" is interpreted by others as "sufficiency." It isn't perfection, but in many cases it's good enough. Just because someone else likes something that you don't doesn't equate to an attack on you.Why would I accept mediocrity when I can make ammo that expands well and shoots better and even costs less? Yeah, Sierra bullets ain't that expensive.
I swear, between the Core Lokt fanatics and the .30-06 fanatics on this board, I'm beginning to wonder why they don't just outlaw production of any center fire rifle ammo, but 165 grain Core Lokt .30-06? I mean, everyone here, but me would have ammo, it seems. ROFL
That's a little over the top, don't you think?Why would I accept mediocrity when I can make ammo that expands well and shoots better and even costs less? Yeah, Sierra bullets ain't that expensive.
I swear, between the Core Lokt fanatics
That's a little over the top, don't you think?
I'll agree with that. Seems you are focused on accuracy while others have focused on performance of the bullet, which is where the Core Lokt shines, but to your point, you do have to hit the target, and the Core Lokt won't shoot the best in all rifles, that's for sure.If you're shootin' a doe at 50 yards with a .30-30 open sights, I guess it don't matter, but across a New Mexico canyon, I want some accuracy.