Remington 870 ?s

Status
Not open for further replies.
Exactly like Virginian said all the receivers are vibra-honed in the same tanks with same pellets at the same time, every model. I have walk on the cat walk by those tanks several times so I know it to be so.

One must understand the word Marketing to understand the models. Much ado is made about the Superiority of the Police due to the claims that they are made with heavier parts. This is not a lie but it is for sure a deliberate Marketing ploy.

There are only two parts involved and only in the 4+1 model guns. The heavy carrier dog follower spring is used in all the models except the Police. That is the silver spring and it cost $4.95. In the Police they use a model 1100 carrier latch spring in place of the heavy carrier dog follower spring and it cost $4.95 and is the black spring that many have seen in my videos. Well, if that black spring works so much better and it cost the same as the silver one then why don't they put it in the Wingmaster, Express and all the Express Tactical Models?

In all the Express 4+1 and the Wingmaster they use a 4 shot spring that cost $4.95. In the police 4+1 they use a spring called the Police Long and it also cost $4.95 and that spring is a true upgrade since you get better feed of the shells back on to the carrier. Since both springs cost the same why don't they put them in all the models?

The answer to the above two questions is "Marketing" and they would loose the right to tell you that the Police is built with heavier parts since all the other parts are the same in all 870's, except of course the MIM extractor in the Express and Express Tactical Models.

So yes, certain things are preserved to market certain models. Same is done with most every thing we buy. If you are old enough to remember shopping at Sears in the Old day you will remember this. For many things like Towels, sheets and others there were three levels, Good, Better and Best. You could pick up this items and feel and see the differences. The Towels market best were heavier and the weaving was tighter. Those days are gone. You now have to trust some pimple faced kid called an "Associate" to tell you why you should pay more for this model over that one. You sure can't tell the difference anymore unless you consider the obvious and useless bells and whistles an upgrade. I don't, I consider them a bunch of mess.

I constantly hear from customers how smooth their Dad's old Wingmaster is compared to the new models. I tell them put the same amount of rounds through any 870 and it will be just as smooth. It has to because the parts are the same and have not changed nor has the specifications of the guns. If fact the manufacturing has gotten better because the computers and robotics are more precise then the humans who built your Dads old 870.

I know myths die hard and many will still not accept the facts. Like J.T. said, "you can believe it if it helps you to sleep". As for me, I go to the Horses mouth every three years and I sit in class and listen to every word. I know the facts and I don't try and perpetrate a myth on anyone to make more money. I would take a model 25549 Remington 870 Express Home Defense into any close quarters fight whether it be Home Defense, Duty or even Urban Combat and I would never feel under gunned. In fact, if I can't take my 870 to a gun fight I just ain't going.
 
The ejection ports on 2-3/4" and 3" guns are EXACTLY the same size. Don't believe me, measure it, I did. The ejector and ejector spring set up is different, on 3" set up the step is 1/4" further back (Usually closer to 5/16"). That is all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vba
That $69 barrel is not a factory barrel but one made in china. Also the bead is thread right into the barrel and thus below the line of sight as Remington beads are pressed into a pedestal. So that knock off barrel is below the line of sight. You get what you pay for and with barrel you get $69 worth of mess.
 
If it were me, I would keep the original barrel, then buy another barrel with the bells and whistles you desire.

I'd go this route. I'm one of those that hates to see a hacksaw on ANY kind of classic shotgun, not that it's a M12 Winchester or something, but, yeah, 870s ain't what they used to be. But it wouldn't hurt to buy a short barrel for your Wingmaster and pull the plug out of the magazine.
 
I know a few things about the subject and will respond with facts.

Talk to me about chamber finishing, 'Tac.

I've no experience of comtemporary 870s since I only have one and that's an ol' Wingmaster. I do, however, read a lot of the American gun forums and have often come across the advice to polish - or even hone - modern Express chambers.

Is this needless? Are the chambers finished just as good as they used to be?

Regards,

Mark.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vba
read a lot of the American gun forums and have often come across the advice to polish - or even hone - modern Express chambers.

My own opinion on "fixing things that are not broke" is that you sometimes cause problems rather than fixing them.

You should try out any ammo you intend to load or shoot much of to see if it functions in your shotguns. IF its seizing in your chamber and resists ejection then you may need to polish your chamber but if the problem can be fixed by simply using another type or brand of quality shell then you can make the decision on if its worth the trouble to polish the chamber.

The only ammo I've ever had any problems with was some Hungarian manufactured dove and quail loads some 20+ years ago that seized in the chamber of all my pumps, a Win Model 12, Remington 870 and Ithaca 37. While it was quite inexpensive I simply quite using it. Still have a couple boxes sitting around. Maybe I'll try it in the SXS Savage Fox I picked up a while ago.

I think most of the advice on having to polish the chambers is due to low cost economy ammo with steel rather than brass bases you find once in a while at Walmart and other discount places.
 
Mark, no chambers are finished as well as they used to be. From anyone who mass markets shotguns, in my opinion. The gun makers reduced the level of polish to "only" what was required. But, then the steel base cheap shotshells came along and threw a monkey wrench into the mix. I have seen 870s, Mossbergs, Novas, and even BPSs being beat on the ground. No 37s because they won't take it. :) It's an easy fix. Most people just burnish the chambers with steel wool wrapped around a dowel or brush, but you can use a drum brake wheel cylinder hone and totally solve the problem if necessary.
A few years ago Remington did put out a bunch of 870 Expresses - not Wingmasters - with excessively rough chambers. This led to the wave of "Remington QC has gone to hell" posts all over the internet. That has been addressed, and as far as I am aware Remington took care of anyone who contacted them as opposed to just moaning on the internet. In all my years I have run across one 11-87 Premier with a rough chamber, and Remington replaced that barrel. My opinion is that that barrel skipped a step in manufacturing.
I have owned 7 870s, including one Express, and 14 1100/11-87s, and sold and/or worked on I don't know how many more.
 
Most people just burnish the chambers with steel wool wrapped around a dowel or brush

This is the approach that I took on my 1981 Ithaca M37 DSPS and 2011 Chiappa 1887. The '1887 was giving me *hard* extractions whereas the 'M37 was *failing* to extract. Both guns were running (European) Gamebore steel-based ammo. The "polishing" with steel wool certainly appeared to have improved matters, but I still get the odd hiccough.

My 870 WM hasn't given me any trouble in this regard but, then again, I don't use it much - just once or twice a year for a round or two of Sporting Clays.

While I'm still getting extraction problems with the 'M37, I like it so much that I don't really want to exchange it for a Benelli Supernova - I just like wood 'n' blued steel. (Gamebore say that *all* of their ammo is steel-based. I'd like to know if American shooters have extraction issues with Gamebore ammo.)

Honing? Well, I dunno; that seems a bit extreme...

Regards,

Mark.
 
You can't apply too much force because the spring loaded stones won't let you.

Ah. Not as fierce as I thought. Something to coinsider, then. (Right now, I have another issue that needs fixing that *may* be contributing to the extraction problems. When that's fixed, I'll take a closer look at honing.)

Thanks.

Regards,

Mark.
 
I have an 870 Police Magum that was made back in the 60s as well. Don't sell it, it's probably better quality and better functioning than many current-production 870s.
 
(Right now, I have another issue that needs fixing that *may* be contributing to the extraction problems. When that's fixed, I'll take a closer look at honing.)

You may also use the steel-wool-on-a-stick method, chucked up in a drill motor.
 
The statement about resale value does not prove old 870's are better but simply proves my point because people are paying for their perception.

I challenge anyone to name the parts that are better and back it up with facts as to why. You can't because perception is not a fact. Facts are that very few of the parts have changed and those that have are the improved parts which make the newer models better.

I am amazed by the number of people who still buy into this myth. If they had the 35 years of working on these guns that I do and sat in class at the Factory in Ilion for a week every three years they would know what I know. And knowing what I know means I am seldom if ever proved wrong on the subject of the Remington 870. Period. This is of course the only topic I am always right on. I said that Beta would be the format of the future 'cause VHS was junk. I said cable TV was not going to work 'cause no one would pay for TV. I also said that no one would buy a telephone and have to carry it around with them all the time. So, you see I am never right, except on the topic of the 870.
 
Last edited:
I think most of the advice on having to polish the chambers is due to low cost economy ammo with steel rather than brass bases you find once in a while at Walmart and other discount places.

Even higher end ammo has steel casings; very few use brass any more (Win AA and Rem STS are the two biggest exceptions)
 
Even higher end ammo has steel casings; very few use brass any more (Win AA and Rem STS are the two biggest exceptions)

As I said, I'd be interested to know if anyone in the USA uses Gamebore ammo in their M37 - especially if it's an early eighties DSPS, like mine.

I have a feeling that *all* the shotgun ammo I've ever seen is steel-based. I'm not the only M37 owner in the UK who has extraction problems and would really like to be able to eliminate the ammo as a cause of the trouble.

I tend to use Gamebore ammo since the local "farmers' shop" stocks it and I can just walk home with a slab in my backpack. (Also, if I need it, they'll order Gamebore stuff by the slab that they don't normally have in stock.)

Regards,

Mark.
 
The Winchester Universals are pretty much acknowledged as THE worst shotgun shells as far as likely to hang or drag in the chamber. My 1100s will run them all day long, but they do rip the bases of about half the fired shotshells. Those chambers are literally like a mirror and have been since the day they were made. Chamber finish DOES make a difference. If yours isn't like a mirror, it will work better if it is.
 
Sell it! Then get yourself a new "tactical" shotgun........... If your present 870 has no special meaning to you. You`d be way ahead in the game. JMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top