Replacement stocks for Savage 10 fp

Status
Not open for further replies.

mshootnit

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
4,472
A few years ago I bought a Savage 10 308 rifle with plastic non accu-whatever stock. Heavy barrel. It was a blind mag centerfeed. I have ditched the stock and bought the dbm plate and trigger guard with the intent to buy a decent stock and convert the rifle from the blind mag to dbm.
I am seeing the HS precision stocks, a Bell Carlson M40, A McMillan A3 sporter possibly. Boyds laminate. I had not thought about going the chassis route bc I already have the factory dbm hardware.
Which of those do you recommend, if any? Others?
 
I am seeing the HS precision stocks, a Bell Carlson M40, A McMillan A3 sporter possibly. Boyds laminate. I had not thought about going the chassis route bc I already have the factory dbm hardware. Which of those do you recommend, if any? Others?
I have Savage short actions in the B&C M40, the MDT LSS / LSS XL, and a handful of different Boyds stocks (ProVarmint, Heritage, AT-One). Comparing the three:
  • I prefer the B&C M40 for field use; the cast aluminum bedding block is solid and the comb/drop is well suited for a myriad of field positions. The rear swivel will rotate (annoying but not harmful) but it's otherwise a decent product. I would prefer QD sling cups and molded checkering instead of relying on a pebbled finish for grip, but that's a nit. At $315 to my door, it's a terrific value.
  • The MDT LSS chassis is a decent option; the original LSS is too short in the forearm and the XL is a must if you want to shoot off a bipod / bags. It's cold in the hand and a little less handy in the woods than the M40 style. The current / Gen2 forearm accepts MLOK kit (e.g. QD cups) and the use of an AR style stock similarly can provide QD cups at the rear (if you want a traditional two-point sling carry). My last LSS XL was $450 to my door, so it's definitely a step up in price from the B&C.
  • The different Boyds can be a decent option, but once you add the pillar option and an adjustable comb (if the selected style doesn't fit you well) it's pretty expensive. Of the three, it's my least-preferred choice but it's still serviceable. I want to say that the last handful that I bought were in the $300 range to my door; pricing a ProVarmint with checkering / adjustable comb / real recoil pad / pillar got me up to $370 plus shipping. At this price range, the B&C is a much better value assuming that the M40 shape fits you.
 
Last edited:
I have Savage short actions in the B&C M40, the MDT LSS / LSS XL, and a handful of different Boyds stocks (ProVarmint, Heritage, AT-One). Comparing the three:
  • I prefer the B&C M40 for field use; the cast aluminum bedding block is solid and the comb/drop is well suited for a myriad of field positions. The rear swivel will rotate (annoying but not harmful) but it's otherwise a decent product. I would prefer QD sling cups and molded checkering instead of relying on a pebbled finish for grip, but that's a nit. At $315 to my door, it's a terrific value.
  • The MDT LSS chassis is a decent option; the original LSS is too short in the forearm and the XL is a must if you want to shoot off a bipod / bags. It's cold in the hand and a little less handy in the woods than the M40 style. The current / Gen2 forearm accepts MLOK kit (e.g. QD cups) and the use of an AR style stock similarly can provide QD cups at the rear (if you want a traditional two-point sling carry). My last LSS XL was $450 to my door, so it's definitely a step up in price from the B&C.
  • The different Boyds can be a decent option, but once you add the pillar option and an adjustable comb (if the selected style doesn't fit you well) it's pretty expensive. Of the three, it's my least-preferred choice but it's still serviceable. I want to say that the last handful that I bought were in the $300 range to my door; pricing a ProVarmint with checkering / adjustable comb / real recoil pad / pillar got me up to $370 plus shipping. At this price range, the B&C is a much better value assuming that the M40 shape fits you.
The 14.25" LOP of the M40 does not bother you?
 
The 14.25" LOP of the M40 does not bother you?
It's actually a scant 14"; I just went and measured both a LA and SA version to be sure. The radiused edges of the 1" Decelerator recoil pad means that it shoulders shorter than it measures. It is certainly not noticeable in feel compare to most 13.5" LOP rifles.

As an FYI - the Target model has a 13.5" LOP, and it's what I use for my range toys that don't have a chassis.

BCD50376-12C1-43EF-8E29-13AE9343909D.jpeg
 
Last edited:
It's actually a scant 14"; I just went and measured both a LA and SA version to be sure. The radiused edges of the 1" Decelerator recoil pad means that it shoulders shorter than it measures. It is certainly not noticeable in feel compare to most 13.5" LOP rifles.

As an FYI - the Target model has a 13.5" LOP, and it's what I use for my range toys that don't have a chassis.

View attachment 959761
good to know
 
One additional option may be the Choate Tactical. Don't know which one you'd need out of the options, but their explanation helps you figure out. Its a pretty affordable option for an occasional use rifle. It is heavy, just as a heads up. I have one for my Savage 10 FCP and I'm a fan for sure. Mine required some minor inletting to fit just right, but I was able to do it myself and I'm no gunsmith.

20201001_123519.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top