Replacing my Velveeta-steel Browning HP

Status
Not open for further replies.

fnbrowning

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2003
Messages
51
Location
Missouri
Hello everyone;

First off, was that not a catchy title? I will explain it in a minute.

I currently own a 1986 Browning Hi Power Mk II. I had it customized by Jim Garthwaite in 1999 with all the usual carry refinements. It has had a 18.5pd spring and buffer since ‘99.

I do not shoot IDPA, or other pistol disciplines, but I try to stay competent with the gun. In the time I’ve owned it I can only guess at the round count, which might be in the neighborhood of several thousand rounds.

The title: Lately I’ve been reading about Brownings, and everywhere I stop to visit, pistoleros are making unfavorable comments about the Mark II series and how those pistols are all destined to calamitous failure and an early grave due to the soft steel in the forged MK II. One poster in a forum actually used the epithet "Velveeta-steel" regarding the forged BHP.
The criticisms have me despondent, and anxious to replace the pistol.

If you’d like to help me chose a replacement for the Browning, please read on!

I am a long time and committed single action pistol shooter. All my experience, and muscle memory is tuned to that platform, and that’s where I want to stay. As I have a perfectly fine carry pistol, the replacement for the BHP Mk II would be a combat sized pistol for open carry. So weight or length aren’t compelling issues.

I want to continue throwing 9mm. (AKA europellets in some forums! :) ) The catch is that as a reloader, I can make “warm” 9mm loads as easily and inexpensively as downloaded ammo, and see no reason not to train with the ammo I’d have to shoot defensively with.

Therefore the pistol I replace the Browning Hi Power Mk II with should be resistant to wear from high power 9mm. Disclaimer: I do know and accept that all pistols with wear faster with hotter loads. I’m just asking the pistol not show grossly accelerated wear with heavy NATO rounds.

Ergonomics. I noticed the Sig P226 226 X-Five Tactical comes in SAO, so I sought out a standard P226 to try on for size. However, coming from a BHP, when I picked up the Sig, my hand felt like I was grasping a hand cannon, or the wrong side of a baseball bat. . .

So what are the criteria I’m looking for?

Service or combat style in 9mm, in Single Action Only or readily convertible to SAO.
Very reliable out of the box, and decent factory or aftermarket support.
Minimum 10 round magazines.
Accuracy: My BHP shoots to 3" or less at 15yds so that’s a standard I like.
Durability: Resistant to wear from warm loads, like NATO Spec 9mm.
Good trigger out-of-box or tunable trigger.
 
I could keep the Mk II Wow, I've had the pistol for many years

But the negitive buzz I read has me genuinely concerned now about parts breakage in the gun. No where can I get a round count life estimate on the Mk II series or confirm or deny the criticisms of a short lifespan.

MKII, or MKIII or CZ 75b. - What would you do Wow?
 
Keep your BHP and look for a SIG P226 X-Five in one of the variants available. There are several models, including some that are SAO. Pricey, but a thing of beauty and VERY accurate.

Or, you could just ignore the buzz, as someone else suggested.

That buzz is always there for almost any brand of gun, and generally it's BS. BHPs don't break easily or often.
 
People worry about the older SIG pistols with pinned breech blocks. "Omg they get loose and crack the frame from slide flex!"

I have two that are of that design and who knows how many rounds. Breech blocks are locked solid in the slides, the pins aren't walking either. Shoot the gun, and if it starts to wear out and whatever, get a new one. Basically people will find something to whine about. Remember that nothing lasts forever. Enjoy your velveeta BHP, use it till it's toast, and retire it. I'm fairly sure it won't be a sudden and catastrophic failure.
 
jonnyc
Or you could just stop listening to "the negative buzz".
That's an option. However, on the pistol-forum.com, they were attributing cracked barrel lugs to poor metallurgy.
As written there:
>>"My lack of confidence regarding the BHP's barrel service life comes from talking to enough folks I trust whose experience included not just factory barrels but high quality aftermarket barrels. FBI HRT tried for a long time to make theirs more durable and without adequate success. I'm reaching out to a friend with a lot of experience during that era in the unit for more details."<<
and
>>"The FBI/Novak guns were forged frame guns, that Wayne Novak cobbled together for them (snip) . . FBI special as a basis of comparison . . basing our assessments on the obsolescent Hi Power forged platform, with their softer steels and softer small components."<<

A cracked barrel is a hard to predict catastrophic failure, and could cause a really 'bad day' when you need the pistol the most.


Walt Sherrill
Keep your BHP and look for a SIG P226 X-Five in one of the variants available. There are several models, including some that are SAO. Pricey, but a thing of beauty and VERY accurate.

I did seek out a standard P226 to try on for size. However, coming from a BHP, when I picked up that Sig, my hand felt like I was grasping a hand cannon, or the wrong side of a baseball bat, or a fat tree limb . . .
 
You can conceivably have a catastrophic failure with any gun's barrel -- stuff happens. (I had it happen with a Witness Sport Long Slide, some years back.) Here's THAT .45 barrel:

Dscn0740.gif

That written, in my many years of participating on the gun forums on the web, and quite a few years as a BHP owner myself, I've never before encountered a discussion of barrel failure of barrel lug issues in a BHP. It can't be THAT common!

I had a BHP barrel fail, but it wasn't catastrophic -- as it continued to shoot afterwards, and I didn't notice a great change in performance or accuracy, In that case, part of two "lands" of the barrel near the crown got damaged -- don't know how it happened; I just noticed it when cleaning the barrel several days later. I was both surprised and sickened.

Rather than replace the damaged barrel with a factory barrel, which are too darned expensive ($400+/-), and not wanting to wait for a Bar-Sto barrel (arguably one of the best that money can buy, but not always available from Bar-Sto without a long wait), I picked up an EFK Firedragon barrel. I love that barrel: it was beautifully made, dropped right into my T-Series BHP, and may be more accurate than the factory barrel.

http://www.efkfiredragon.com/browning.html

Just picking up another barrel -- perhaps a Bar-Sto -- would seem to be a better, more economical, and arguably more practical alternative than to dumping your BHP. Bar-Stos are clearly the Gold Standard of after-market barrels. Having Bar-Sto fit it also makes sense, but adds a lot to the total costs -- including shipping.

If you still feel you can't be confident in your BHP, the only gun I've owned that seems similar (in the ways you want it to be similar) is the CZ 75B SA model; getting one from the CZ Custom Shop, with the tuning already done seems a good way to go and would give you a gun that can probably fit in your existing holsters and feel much the same in your hand.
 
Keep it. There is nothing wrong with a MK II's steel. If you want an excuse to buy another 9MM, get a MK III BHP, CZ-75 variant or Beretta 92FS.
 
by Pilot:
Keep it. There is nothing wrong with a MK II's steel. If you want an excuse to buy another 9MM, get a MK III BHP, CZ-75 variant or Beretta 92FS.

No, don't want an excuse to divorce the "Lady" I've kept with for 27 years. I just want to know she'll be healthy for the forseeable future.

Any MkII BHP owners that want to chime in with round counts and maintenance schedules would keep me loyal. :)
 
Shoot it with the ammunition it was intended for and enjoy it. Everything mechanical fails sooner or later but ones thing's for sure ... the bad stuff gets the press. Why think of all the "bad press" about shooting lead bullets in Glocks. I fired ten of thousands befoer i got edumicated on thew interweebs an realised I was doing it all wrong.


"They can't put anything that's not true on the internet.", BonJour
 
Shoot then shoot some more. Rinse and repeat..

If I worried what people online thought, I don't believe I could own a single gun.. Name it someone is bad mouthing it. Heck one of my Hi Powers has a Cast frame... OMG it's gonna crumple apart!

If you really want a 9mm SAO. Nighthawk Heinie PDP, Beretta Steel are ones no one will bad mouth. :)
 
Wait... you have shot this gun for 27 years, and now the internet has you worried? Keep your gun, man. If your worried, have it inspected, but if your not abusing it or feeding it hot rounds, my guess is your gun will keep on ticking.

The net is full of good information, but you gotta weigh everything with a grain of salt.

sent from my Galaxy Note II.
 
If you've been using a hipower all those years why switch?
Option 1: As has already been suggested get a cast frame MKIII. The frame was developed in part to withstand 40s&w. 9mm shouldn't be that big a deal.
Option 2: Get a cast frame 40s&w MKIII and get it set up with a 9mm barrel using the 40s&w slide. I've heard of several people doing this over the years.
You should be able to shoot hot 9mm in that for the next 27 years and the 27 years after that.
 
I used to use a set of pistols used for training at an agency, they were BHP T series BHPs-the guys that took care of them told me they had all gone way over 50,000 rounds but didn't know how much over.

They all shot very well, no malfs, accurate and smooth. Supposedly the MKIIIs are even tougher.

I wouldn't worry a bit, you are likely to see many other pistols give up before the BHP.
 
Anyone telling you there is a problem with BHP's in 9mm simply doesn't know what they are talking about.

For the life of me I can't understand why anyone listens to that kind of BS. The BHP is widely known as one of the most reliable handguns ever made. It's the only gun I would be comfortable taking straight out of the box, loading it up and carrying without shooting it in a bit.
 
I am not sure how any pistol would hold up using a regular diet of warm rounds. I have had a couple of HP's and never had a problem.

That said, see if you can find a CZ 85. I think they called it a combat version. They have a great feel that is not unlike a HP.

I owned one of those too. Great pistol.

Any excuse will do to get a new pistol, you have to learn to dislike the one you have first then let the lust for a new one take over.

Let us know what you end up with.
 
Sounds like the message here, and another site that this is posted, is pretty clear........the problem you heard about does not exist. I have 7 HPs, all with at least a few thousand rounds. I have seen nothing to indicate any kind of metallurgy issue. Apparently I am not alone.
 
I traded over a year ago for an used FM90 (also have a Browning MIII and consider it better built than the FM) that the owner said he put a few thousand rounds through. It had some wobble or shake to it, but most of the painted fnish remained. That well used HP clone shoots better for me than most handguns costing 2-3 times as much, and is totally reliable even with the "humped" style feed ramp.

I liked it so much I added some cutom touches to it such as, Cylinder & Slide ''No bite" hammer and sear set, Cylinder & Slides extended single side safety, Novak rear sights, and thin Ergo grips for carry. Love the thing now, truely one of my favorites!

Don't worry about yours unless it is showing issues, they are amazing pistols!
 
FN,

By now I hope you are seeing the trend of opinion. You're in fine shape with your MKII. Shoot comfortable ammo in the middle of the power curve and your grandkids will be enjoying that pistol.

Here's the guidance.

1. Keep the gun.
2. Any questions, see #1.

Happy shooting,
 
Although I also would recommend keeping it, if you're dead set on not keeping it then my vote goes to the CZ-75 SAO. IMHO it comes in close second to the BHP on the list of best guns designed for 9mm.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top