That is a lot of gun for $200. Who has that deal?
I concur with this. I'd much rather have an old Taurus than a new Armscor 200.I put them one good step above the old RG revolvers and about one to 1 1/2 steps below the Taurus.
I was in a new gun store last week that opened just around the corner from my day job. I handled, but did not get to shoot, the S&W 637, Ruger LCR, Charter Arms Undercover, and Armscor 206, and compared the feel of all of them side-by-side. The Armscor felt substantial, and pretty well-made. I didn't care much for the grip angle, but I suppose it would grow on me after awhile.That is a lot of gun for $200. Who has that deal?
...
The real sleeper in the market appears to be Charter Arms, whose quality may soon surpass that of Smith & Wesson if it hasn't already, according to some message board experts on the net.