Ruger SR9 First Range Report

Status
Not open for further replies.

Boarhunter

Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
714
Location
Huntsville, Alabama
Obviously, I was not the only one attracted to Larry's Pistol & Pawn; Huntsville, Alabama ("Where every day is a gun show!"), on Saturday to see and shoot Ruger's newest 9 mm. Being a fairly committed 1911 man (though I dabbled with an AR-24 recently), I went to the store with every intention of being dissatisfied with the product.

But I was not. And bought one of the "limited edition" packages, consisting of a relatively low serial number... mine is 3XX... and an engraved tactical knife, all priced at $499. As has been mentioned elsewhere in this forum, Larry was also taking pre-orders for regular production guns for $399, as I recall.

I will not repeat the gun's specifications as they are now available on Ruger's web page.

But these are my preliminary thoughts having handled the gun only a short time and having put only 75 rounds downrange.

First, it is not a plastic 1911. It does not have the crisp single-action trigger pull of high-dollar 1911s (nor does it have a high-dollar price tag!). The trigger pull is smoother and lighter, though, than is found on many double-action-only pistols on the market today.

And it does have a manual ambidextrous safety, though significantly smaller than is found on your typical "combat" 1911. (I would sure like to see Ruger modify the safety so you can rest a thumb on it while shooting.)

The magazine release is where you would expect to find it and comfortable to use. And as a bonus, it too is ambidextrous. The magazines drop free without hangup, whether loaded or not.

Speaking of magazines, it is virtually impossible to load the magazines without the included mag loader. No exaggeration. You simply cannot get the cartridges into the magazines without the included mechanical loader. That may be one of the most significant downsides to the package.

The adjustable sights are nice and much appreciated. I recently purchased an Armalite AR-24, which shot approximately 2 inches low at 20 yards. I was unable to find any after-market sights for the gun, nor was Armalite able to help me with replacement sights. Having nice low-profile adjustable sights is a blessing as this gun too shoots a bit low. But that problem will be cured the next time I go to the range.

How did it shoot? Very well, thank you.

I took the gun from the sales counter straight to the indoor range and ran 75 rounds through it over a very short period of time. No lubrication other than what was on it from the factory. Not a single bobble. None. Zero. And although I did not attempt any "accuracy" testing from a bench, it appears to be a very nice shooter. I would say that it shoots (at least for me) virtually as well as any of the various 1911s that I own.

I have not taken the time to compare specs on the various plastic hi-cap 9s, but this Ruger SR9 seems extraordinarily thin in the grips, and I like that much. The gun almost feels like a 1911 with thin grips rather than a block of 2x4 pine.

Rumor has it that it will fit in Glock 17 holsters. That would sure be nice, and I plan to test the rumor first of the week.

For those of you interested in IDPA, I am assuming that it will be classified as an SSP gun and not as an ESP gun since, at least according to the included manual, the trigger actually retracts the striker a bit prior to it being released.

Field stripping the gun took all of five minutes (at most), and that included reading the disassembly instructions in the manual. It is fairly straightforward and easy to accomplish. No tools are required.

Finally, one of the promoted features of the gun is the reversible backstrap. From the factory, the backstrap "bulges" a bit like the 1911A1; pop out a plastic pin and the backstrap can be reversed giving a flat profile (my personal preference). I did make the change on my firearm, and it took all of two minutes and a paper clip (again, including the time it took to read the instructions).

In summary, do not expect the gun to the a plastic 1911. But aside from the significant difficulty in loading the magazines, the gun is a "keeper." I like it pretty good.

Recommended changes: First, fix the magazines so they can be loaded by hand; second, extend the safety so that the shooter can get a high grip and ride the safety with the thumb.

I plan to put a lot of ammo through the SR9 over the next couple of weeks, and I will keep you posted.

Boarhunter
 
thanks so much for the review i have been waiting on a report, and that was a good one, i will be following you and your post in the future on this topic, btw congrats on the new gun.
 
Awesome

Glad to see the first runs werent a complete flop...although we will see.

I look forward to later updates. thanks for your report!:D
 
Great thanks for the report!

Sounds like the gun will be a winner, which makes me want one even more. I have a feeling no matter how much I try to retrain myself I'll end up at J&G and walk out with an SR9:rolleyes:
 
Great thanks for the report!

Sounds like the gun will be a winner, which makes me want one even more. I have a feeling no matter how much I try to retrain myself I'll end up at J&G and walk out with an SR9:rolleyes:
 
I tried the SR9 in the gunstore today... the trigger pull is on par with my Nagant revolvers in terms of being gritty. No thanks.
 
Personally, I'm kind of underwhelmed by the thought of yet another 'new and improved' wonder-nine - 25 years too late to be relevant. 'A smooth trigger pull' the advertising video proclaims. From Ruger? No way.

Not trying to rain on your parade, but... yawn.
 
I wish someone around me had one, but I went over to Frontier in Fallon and there were none to be found. Good report, thanks for the info.

Jamie
 
Personally I didn't find the trigger all that bad on the one I handled. It feels like just about the same as the trigger did on my M&P when I first got it. After a few hundred rounds the grittyness went away and now it feels great.
 
I tried the SR9 in the gunstore today... the trigger pull is on par with my Nagant revolvers in terms of being gritty. No thanks.

:eek::eek::eek:

I hope not as heavy! I think I could hang my 107 pound Rottweiler from the trigger of my 1895 and it would not fire in DA mode.
 
No, not as heavy. Just four distinct stages of trigger pull, before it finally breaks. Squuuueeeze it and you get "click.......grind......click......click..... BANG"
 
Hell...I can strip and reassemble a MKII in less time. More than once. What was so complicated?
According to the text of the review, the five minutes includes reading the manual.

And if you've ever leafed through the owner's manual of a Ruger firearm, you'll probably appreciate the difficulty in picking out the relevant text amid the clutter of warning messages and graphics that seem to make up the majority of the manual. :D
 
Worry not about the magazines. I've found with other Ruger hicap 9mm mags that they get much easier to load with a little use. Their 15 rounders for the P89/95 feel more like 13 rounders when you first use them. Those last two rounds simply don't want to go in. After sitting loaded for a week or so and a few trips to the range though they work in nicely.
 
Right after the shipment came in to Larry's on Thursday, I tried one out of the box, and it was both "gritty" and "grabby." Not pleasant at all. When I went back on Saturday, both the range gun and the one I bought were a bit less so when fired. I think you notice it less when shooting than when dry firing. Plus, the guns had a few rounds through them, and that may account some for the improvement. But the triggers are not the gun's greatest asset, particularly for one accustomed to a 1911. I personally think it would make a nice SSP gun. And likely a nice carry gun.

By the way, I can disassemble/assemble the gun in seconds...it is a breeze...but reading all the disclaimers and warnings in the manual is a pain in the other end and time-consuming!

While cleaning the gun this weekend, I noted the apparent frailty of the disassembly pin. The pin itself is attached to a paper-thin flat piece of stamped metal, and I can see myself bending it at some point down the road. I hope they are inexpensive, because I will be buying replacements, I guarantee!

Also, this morning, I tried the SR-9 in a Glock 19 Fobus Holster (because it was handy), and it did not fit. The holster was too tight. It is supposed to fit Glock 17 Holsters.... I will let you know.

Boarhunter
 
I personally didn't experience the "trigger grittiness" that others have complained about. The two guns I got to test (5rds through each...one flat strap and one curved....wish I coulda shot more but hey it was free) I loved the trigger on was smoother, crisper, and had ALOT less takeup than my beloved p85, but it was one of the two they were demo'ing so it could have had any number of rounds run through it before I got there. I'm also glad that I'm not the only one that noticed it seemed to shoot a bit low...and not just for me but for the two other guys that came with me as well.

With a $399 pricetag for regular production runs I can't imagine me NOT picking one up.
 
Anybody have any idea about the trigger re-set? Gritty can be smoothed, stiff can be lightened. But take-up & re-set are more intergrated into the design mechanics of the pistol and therefore are harder to modify without major (trigger) surgery.

For instance: David Bowie (Bowie Tactical) can do wonders with the take-up & re-set of a S&W M&P. Ray Harms can do the same with an FN (Browning) Hi-Power. But their processes AREN'T something that should be attempted by an average gun-plumber.

HEY! The striker/slide assembly on a SR9 looks kinda' like a M&P. Maybe Mr. Bowie would consider taking a look-see at one. His work on GLOCKs, XDs & M&Ps is amazing!
 
I honestly wasn't paying attention to reset but I did make sure to pay attention to takeup and it seemed to be less than an XD and far far far less than an early p-series...but alot more than a 1911 obviously
 
Glock 17 holsters do not fit, nor do any other locally available Glock holsters. Nor have I been able to find today any other holster, other than the "cloth and sponge pouches," that would fit the SR-9.... I will keep looking and invite input from others having more success.

Boarhunter
 
Great review. Thanks. Please sent it to Ruger. They'll appreciate the feedback.
 
Sorry, guys, to keep replying to my own post, but information keeps dribbling in....

I just got off the telephone with Ruger. They don't have holsters yet or information on holsters from others. Apparently, things have been moving very, very quickly at Ruger over the new SR-9.

They do have extra magazines available. I was going to order 4 extra mags until I heard the price (and then I ordered only two...for a total cost of $87.50!). They must be very good magazines!

Boarhunter
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top