Paul Gomez
Member In Memoriam
LEO shootings are the closest data set we have to private citizen involved shootings. If we look at the FBI Law Enforcement Officers Killed & Assaulted (LEOKA) data for 2010, we can see that the majority of situations where cops were killed took place inside of 21 feet. In fact, 21 of the 55 LEO killed last year were killed within 0-5 feet! Add to that the 53,000+ assaults upon cops, in the same year, in which the majority of assailants [>95%] used hands, fist or feet, edged weapons or 'other dangerous weapons' and only 3.4% utilized firearms. Why the low number of assaults with guns? Because the majority of the assaults with guns resulted in dead cops and those numbers go on a different page.
Why/How does this correlate to the private citizen? Proximity. Most bad guys are good at what they do. Which is get close enough to you so as to maximize the likelihood of success. Last time I checked, no one was standing across the street yelling 'Hey, you! Through me your wallet or I'm gonna come get ya.' Bad guys get close so they can confront and carry off their mission with the least chance of being intercepted.
Having to integrate unarmed skills with your gunhandling to enable you to get to the point where you can utilize the gun is one aspect of training that is largely ignored. The best program addressing this problem is taught by a good friend of mine, Craig Douglas.
Another aspect, with regards to one handed shooting in general, is that even when there is time and space to utilize two hands, within a certain distance, unless the gun is already out of the holster and in two hands, the majority of people will draw and fire one handed. Skip Gochenaur & John Farnam have written about this based upon observations of hundreds of people attending the NTI over the last 20 years. If we look at Hediger's work on animal proxemics in the 1950s and Hall's work on human proxemics in the 1960s, there is a certain sense to it all.
The need to use the gun offhand only is, admittedly, exceedingly rare. However, if you do find yourself in such a situation, the fact that you are a statistical anomaly will not be very comforting.
Why/How does this correlate to the private citizen? Proximity. Most bad guys are good at what they do. Which is get close enough to you so as to maximize the likelihood of success. Last time I checked, no one was standing across the street yelling 'Hey, you! Through me your wallet or I'm gonna come get ya.' Bad guys get close so they can confront and carry off their mission with the least chance of being intercepted.
Having to integrate unarmed skills with your gunhandling to enable you to get to the point where you can utilize the gun is one aspect of training that is largely ignored. The best program addressing this problem is taught by a good friend of mine, Craig Douglas.
Another aspect, with regards to one handed shooting in general, is that even when there is time and space to utilize two hands, within a certain distance, unless the gun is already out of the holster and in two hands, the majority of people will draw and fire one handed. Skip Gochenaur & John Farnam have written about this based upon observations of hundreds of people attending the NTI over the last 20 years. If we look at Hediger's work on animal proxemics in the 1950s and Hall's work on human proxemics in the 1960s, there is a certain sense to it all.
The need to use the gun offhand only is, admittedly, exceedingly rare. However, if you do find yourself in such a situation, the fact that you are a statistical anomaly will not be very comforting.