S&W 2009 - NEw & Re-Issue Revolvers

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'll give S&W credit for trying, but there are two obvious problems. The market "classic" revolvers are aimed at is the segment that most dislikes the lock and other "improvements." But for those that don't care, they will be a hard sell when for any likely street price (based on the manufacturers suggested retail price (MSRP), you can buy an example of the "real thing," in like-new condition for less in many cases.
Click to expand...
From what I see at shows and in stores, S&W is selling their "classics" hand over fist.
MOST of the buying public doesnt know or care anything about the lock.
They know the quality reputation S&W has, they know they like the looks of the guns.
Look at the cars most people drive, you think they will be concerned about a key hole in the side of the frame?
I understand about old vs new, I have owned both... I ran across people who were willing to PAY for the older S&Ws, with that money I bought new what I couldnt find with the old... at a reasonable price.
Yes, I disable the locks when I get them. But then again, my old .44 mag would bind up and freeze when attempting rapid fire. So I am ahead of the game with my newer ones... they run like clockwork.
The anti lock naysayers are a bunch of angry people on the internet, for the most part.
John Q Public doesnt know or care about the locks and their potential issues.
They know they are buying a Smith. They will take it out and shoot it... and more than likely love it.
They will tell their friends... let THEM shoot it... and further S&Ws sales.


Jim
 
After you remove or alter the lock components to be inoperable, couldn't you disguise the hole by threading it and filling it with a short side plate screw?
Click to expand...

colt Smith,

I've been waiting for some young enterprising machinist with an EDM machine to come up with blued, stainless, and black matte plugs that lock into the keyhole, or something like that.

Yes, I've no doubt that the entire lockset could be removed, the hole tapped, and a flat plug be made to disapear the hole.

On a blued gun there'd be finish issues to deal with but I've been eyeballing my 629 for an attempt. The lock's been out since the gun was new and I'm just now buying another .44 so maybe one day soon I'll risk a go at it.
 
Yup, that's the one. Nice of you to do what I should have and post the link.

I'd like to see the plug be less visible.
Click to expand...

If the revolver being modified was one made of stainless steel or unfinished amuminum, one could make the plug and press fit it the hole. Then sand it flat to the frame. Of course this would require some sort of refinishing, such as bead-blasting or a high polish. A carbon-steel blued gun would probably need to be reblued. But if money is no object ....

Also some of the older style thumbpieces might cover the plug better.

Someone might ask, "Why doesn't someone make and sell this?" I think the answer is that they couldn't get any affordable liability insurance.
 
Last edited:
One of the larger shops around here seems to be moving the classics at a steady clip - mostly the "J" frame models and blue 29s. For reasons which remain unclear, nice original 29s are rare as hen's teeth around these parts. The "classic" may well be the local path of least resistance if one wants a blue .44 Mag S&W and doesn't enjoy buying from auction sites.

The snubbies include the case colored frame variety which, I gather, is a "recreation" of something that never existed. Nevertheless, they don't seem to stick around a long time.

With exceptions, it seemed most of what CDNN was closing out was the model 21. It may be blasphemous to say but I can understand that - the model 21, particularly with colored frame and magna stocks looks misshapen to me in a manner quite unlike any other S&W I can think of. The proportions just seem "off". I don't keep old catalogs but I'd bet a donut the Thunder Ranch 21 was there and was thereafter followed by a couple other versions of 21 - I suspect the 21 will sink without a ripple at which point we'll all clamor for its return. I believe CDNN had nickle 29s as well at one point - they do that just to confuse me.
 
What it is supposed to be is a modern reproduction of a revolver used by Ed. McGivern during the 1930's to set some speed shooting records. His .38 Military & Police Target Model had a square butt, but for reasons I don't understand (ignorence perhaps?) they didn't use stocks to recreate the square butt, which would not have been difficult.

But anyway, I posted the link so that anyone that might be interested could see if any bids were posted, and if so for how much.

For $800 or less I suspect you could buy an original revolver that was made around the same time, and was truly identical to the one McGivern had.

My point in all of this is, why buy a reproduction for more money then an original revolver it was based on would cost?
 
Just for fun you might follow this and see what happens.
Click to expand...

That's an interesting conglomeration. My eyes might be giving out on me but it looks like screw #5 is there but #4 has gone missing. Is the monogrip historically accurate for a McGivern? There's probably a gold bead on the front sight but I can't make it out on the pics.

Why am I asking about historical accuracy of a monogrip when the frame is case colored?

Edited to add: Fuff types faster than I do - question on grip already answered.
 
Last edited:
My point in all of this is, why buy a reproduction for more money then an original revolver it was based on would cost?
Click to expand...

I wonder if there aren't a few narrowly-focused cases where the "classics" are routinely sold for less than the originals? The current production blued 29 crops up in the 800s and that's close to what I think a good used one would fetch - if you could find one.

And then there's the M40 lemon squeezer in the 600s.

During my vigil for a post -2E, pre-lock blued 29 I stated a preference for the lockless article and was rather surprised to note that both staff and customers were looking at me quizzically - not like I'd said anything offensive, more like I'd said something merely incomprehensible. It was the sort of look dealer staff give people declaring a preference for scrimshawed pink mother of pearl stocks or having just landed from Mars.

I was forced to conclude that there's a profound difference between internet gun boards and at least one real-life gun store. People at the store just flat don't care about the lock. (Captain Obvious is whispering in my ear that the folks that find the current product repugnant simply wouldn't be in the store in the first place, but the joint was far from empty).

In this strange netherworld on Singleton in Dallas, the current 29 can look pretty good as it's going to be compared not to a 90% "dash-3" but an ANIB "dash-3" that's going for a minimum of 1,200.00. A "lock agnostic" therefor sees two products at 100% with box and papers and the new one is 400.00 cheaper. It's likely an invalid comparison here but out there ... in that other place ... it can seem perfectly logical. Ditto the lemon squeezer - and the lemon squeezer doesn't even have the lock.
 
If the "Classic" line wasn't selling well then I doubt S&W would keep introducing more and more models each year.

Most people don't care about the lock unless they are a "traditionalist" S&W fan. Go to a gunstore and ask a random person looking at Smith & Wesson revolvers in the case what he thinks about the following things: "Pinned barrels?" "Recessed cylinders?" "MIM parts?" "Internal lock?" He won't have a clue what your talking about and even after you explained in detail he still probably won't care.

As hard as it is for some people to believe things that seem like heresy to die hard gun traditionalists don't mean jack squat to a lot of other people.

"What's that? What do you mean "four clicks" when I pull the hammer back? Why the hell would I care about that? Transfer bar? Why wouldn't I want that? You mean I can only carry 5 rounds in a 6 shot gun? What?"
 
I certainly wouldn't want the word to go around that older guns might possibly be better then current ones, especially if some specific reasons cropped up. If what we have here became common knowledge the prices of older guns would skyrocket like a tricked-out AR-15. Why I have been stealing these old "junk" guns for so long that I wouldn't know how to go about buying them for a fair price. :eek:

All I was trying to do was explain to Hawk that there was a difference. Now I won't live long enough to get over the regret... :D

Oh, and AJD is right. Most buyers don't have a clue, and I'd prefer it stayed that way...
 
Some guys would whine about a knob job. The locks are here to stay.....get over it. I prefer them without the lock also but that is the world we live in.

Revolver lovers should be happy that an American company producing revolvers is still in business.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

B
  • Locked
10MM Ato vs .40 S&W & Bbl. Len.
Replies
0
Views
511
BlindJustice
B
Flechette
  • Locked
S&W Scandium model confusion
Replies
15
Views
3K
HankB
H
S
  • Locked
Current revolvers
Replies
11
Views
960
ZVP
Z
B
  • Locked
Wish S&W would...
2 3
Replies
68
Views
2K
Sam1911
S
P
  • Locked
Does Anyone Have A S&W Model 17-8?
Replies
12
Views
3K
kle
K
Back
Top