It was a clean professional job.At home gunsmithing at it's finest.
It is something that doesn’t have to be on it . It looks hideous . It was done for political reasons and it can and has failed . You can by a good revolver that doesn’t have it , even a used S&W . Most of my S&W revolvers were bought used .If I could choose to have one without the lock I would, but the fanatic hatred of it is perplexing to me.
I'll agree except as stupid is, stupid does.C'mon man, it's for the kids.....
Don't you guys love the kids???
I mean it takes a village to raise our, I mean your kids.
Don't you want our, I mean your kids to be safe?
(Typed with the utmost sarcasm)
I often wonder, how many people that claim they “will never buy a Smith & Wesson with a lock” will buy a new S&W when / if they manufacture revolvers without the locks?
That’s a very good and valid point. I haven’t had any issues with crud getting into the action via the lock but I can see how it could happen.I don't like it adds locations for crap to enter the gun.
As the armorer for my depart, I have replaced every moving part on S&W revolvers. Mainsprings get broken (one of the ears snaps off), sight blades, barrels, hammers, triggers, you name it. Revolvers that get used everyday can get beat. When one of our guys retired, I had to file his rear sight back into the correct shape, on a Model 10!"Anything mechanical can fail but the risk is very, very low. Heck, mainsprings fail all the time."
Really? When was the last time you saw a mainspring fail? I have never seen a mainspring fail, and I have never seen a picture of an S&W mainspring failure.
I have owned probably 40 S&W revolvers over the last 20+ years.
I have owned a number of ILS revolvers and sold most of them off.
Currently own two, and both run "The Plug".
Only S&W revolver on my current shopping list is a no-lock 642 or a no-lock 442.
All the other ones I own (or care to own) are pre-lock S&Ws.
YMMV, and I really don't care how you rationalize it....
Gosh, add me to the list...and make it a skinny bbl'd, no full under lug, 4"er too...and while we're at it, how 'bout a pair of the old style 'coke bottle' target stocks, and chamber it for that bestest of all 32's, the .32 H&R. Rod (still dreamin' here in KY)You and me both. Lock or no lock.
Cfullgraf: Now, if S&W would make a run of Model 16’s chambered in 32 S&WL, I’d be in hog heaven.
Gosh, add me to the list...and make it a skinny bbl'd, no full under lug, 4"er too...and while we're at it, how 'bout a pair of the old style 'coke bottle' target stocks, and chamber it for that bestest of all 32's, the .32 H&R. Rod (still dreamin' here in KY)