kashton
Member
First of all, I understand that this is completely a matter of personal opinion, I would just like some input of your personal opinion and why, especially if you have shot both guns.
I am purchasing a .357 snub for pocket carry. I already own a S&W 642 CT but would like a .357 for pocket carry. I am having trouble deciding between the two. So far, here are the pluses and minuses of each that I can think of at the moment:
S&W Model 60 Chief's Special .357 2 & 1/8 inch barrel:
+ Made from forged steel
+ Smooth action, great stock springs
+ Edges are finished well
+ I can change out my 642 CT grips onto a new Model 60
+ ~22 oz, so not to heavy but heavy enough to handel .357 loads
+ Conceals in my pocket just as easily as my 642, just a little heavier which I do not mind
+ I can put my CT on the S&W
- Has the lock
- Does not have the safety feature where on the Ruger the gun will not fire from SA without the finger on the trigger
- Slightly shorter barrel than the SP101
Ruger SP101 2 & 1/4 inch barrel:
+ Build like a tank, though made of cast and not forged steel
+ I like the build aesthetically slightly better than the S&W, I like the lug under the barrel too
+ ~25 oz which is a little heavier than the S&W, but will handle .357 slightly better
+ Slightly longer barrel than the S&W = more powder burn and more velocity from the .357 load
- Rugged edges, which aren't as smoothed out as the S&W
- Trigger pull is not as nice stock as the S&W IMO
- I can't put my CT laser grip on the Ruger
I do not know much about the difference in the extractor rods between the two. So far, this is what I have found. I have done a ton of research about these two models, though for some reason I can find more about the SP101 than the S&W. Is there anything that I am missing or that would make my decision a little easier?
Thanks!
Kevin
I am purchasing a .357 snub for pocket carry. I already own a S&W 642 CT but would like a .357 for pocket carry. I am having trouble deciding between the two. So far, here are the pluses and minuses of each that I can think of at the moment:
S&W Model 60 Chief's Special .357 2 & 1/8 inch barrel:
+ Made from forged steel
+ Smooth action, great stock springs
+ Edges are finished well
+ I can change out my 642 CT grips onto a new Model 60
+ ~22 oz, so not to heavy but heavy enough to handel .357 loads
+ Conceals in my pocket just as easily as my 642, just a little heavier which I do not mind
+ I can put my CT on the S&W
- Has the lock
- Does not have the safety feature where on the Ruger the gun will not fire from SA without the finger on the trigger
- Slightly shorter barrel than the SP101
Ruger SP101 2 & 1/4 inch barrel:
+ Build like a tank, though made of cast and not forged steel
+ I like the build aesthetically slightly better than the S&W, I like the lug under the barrel too
+ ~25 oz which is a little heavier than the S&W, but will handle .357 slightly better
+ Slightly longer barrel than the S&W = more powder burn and more velocity from the .357 load
- Rugged edges, which aren't as smoothed out as the S&W
- Trigger pull is not as nice stock as the S&W IMO
- I can't put my CT laser grip on the Ruger
I do not know much about the difference in the extractor rods between the two. So far, this is what I have found. I have done a ton of research about these two models, though for some reason I can find more about the SP101 than the S&W. Is there anything that I am missing or that would make my decision a little easier?
Thanks!
Kevin
Last edited: