Picknlittle
Member
Last night I was comparing a S&W Sigma 9mm and a S&W M&P 9mm. I forget the model numbers, but that's not all that important to this question.
I really liked the feel, weight, balance and sights of both. I asked what the primary difference was and the answer was "trigger". He said the S&W Sigma had a really bad trigger, heavy with lots of creep, and the M&P had a much crisper trigger plus reduced muzzle rise with a compensator.
So here's the issue. The Sigma is $379, the M&P $579. Is there an easy, inexpensive fix or improvement for the Sigma trigger that would not void the warranty? Or, is there more to the M&P that I haven't been told.
I also compared some Rugers in the same price range but they felt a bit chunky.
I really liked the feel, weight, balance and sights of both. I asked what the primary difference was and the answer was "trigger". He said the S&W Sigma had a really bad trigger, heavy with lots of creep, and the M&P had a much crisper trigger plus reduced muzzle rise with a compensator.
So here's the issue. The Sigma is $379, the M&P $579. Is there an easy, inexpensive fix or improvement for the Sigma trigger that would not void the warranty? Or, is there more to the M&P that I haven't been told.
I also compared some Rugers in the same price range but they felt a bit chunky.