Crazy as it sounds, Feinstein is BY FAR the more conservative of our two Senators.Sort of strange, don't you think? The gun Nazi didn't vote.
Crazy as it sounds, Feinstein is BY FAR the more conservative of our two Senators.Sort of strange, don't you think? The gun Nazi didn't vote.
Can you publicize that within the Michigan hunting organizations ? I would think that would get through to even the densest hunter.Even voted for the Kennedy amendment which banned the .30-30.
There's a whole pile of Dem's out there who aren't socialist extremists and gun grabbers.
This is why "local boy" viewpoints are so important regarding politicians. I have to say that I saw Bayh on Fox News right after the last Presidential election, and from his demeanor there, believed him to be a thoughtful Democrat, in the same camp as Zell Miller. The more I read about him though, the more I see that is not the case.I hope we can get rid of Bayh! He tries the same gambit as his father, just a solid American in Indiana, but when he gets to D.C. he turns into a SuperEastCoastEloi
Crazy as it sounds, Feinstein is BY FAR the more conservative of our two Senators.
The "Negative Nannys" are screaming that having the lock be provided with the gun sets the stage for future legislation assigning civil or criminality liability to one who doesn't use it.
Which would take separate legislation to be passed, since the stated intention of the amendment contradicts that interpretation and it would have to be changed prior to being used as precedent.
Which would take two pieces of legislation if I understand correctly. One to change the intentions stated in the amendment, one more to actually create the liability. That's two bills subject to vote by the House and Senate and veto by whoever is then Pres.
True enough, it could go that way in the end (and in fact I don't disagree they are trying in some states even now), but THIS bill does nothing to forward it as it is written.