Archie
Member
I have a good feeling about Savage as a manufacturer and tradition of quality. Of course I am aware and horrified at the loss of talented and motivated workers in general. That's another rant we'll table for the nonce.
I have not handled or even seen the Government Model clone Savage makes. I did just look at the web site and viewed the advertising photos and advertising blurb. Looks like what one essentially did to a Government Model - after buying it - to make it a bit more user friendly.
About the Savage 1907 and 1917 .32 ACP pistols. I have several (part of the collection). They hold ten rounds in the magazine; double stack. The magazine retainer-release is at the bottom of the grip, but instead of being at the heel, it is at the front of the grip and one (at least theoretically) uses the 'pinky' finger to depress the release. The trigger system is a bit complicated, but it works well. Probably plays bad for manufacturing costs, but it works. Grip shape is very ordinary, but functions well for my hands.
There was also a .380 ACP version.
I have not handled or even seen the Government Model clone Savage makes. I did just look at the web site and viewed the advertising photos and advertising blurb. Looks like what one essentially did to a Government Model - after buying it - to make it a bit more user friendly.
About the Savage 1907 and 1917 .32 ACP pistols. I have several (part of the collection). They hold ten rounds in the magazine; double stack. The magazine retainer-release is at the bottom of the grip, but instead of being at the heel, it is at the front of the grip and one (at least theoretically) uses the 'pinky' finger to depress the release. The trigger system is a bit complicated, but it works well. Probably plays bad for manufacturing costs, but it works. Grip shape is very ordinary, but functions well for my hands.
There was also a .380 ACP version.