Savage Stryker .22-250 weirdness

Status
Not open for further replies.

tube_ee

Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
476
From my Dad, who doesn't have an account here...

I chronographed some factory Winchester loads (45 gr bthp) which Winchester says delivered 4000 fps from their test barrel. I got a hair over 3400 fps out of the Striker (12" bbl) which was about what I expected.

I then loaded a bunch of cases from the factory ammo using a Winchester large rifle primer, a 55 gr Sierra bthp behind 34 gr BLC-2 (Hodgdon's max load). These loads chronographed at under 2400 fps, but Hodgdon predicted 3600 fps.

If I account for the shorter bbl at approximately the same percentage as for the 45 gr factory loads, I would predict a hair over 3000 fps. I've disassembled a couple of the loads to eliminate the possibility that the scale got moved somehow, but the charge weighed as expected.

Does anyone have any ideas about where the 600 fps went?

Thanks for helping him out.

--Shannon
 
do they list any faster powders compared to blc(2)'s burn rate? maybe it is too slow of a powder, what is the muzzle flash like compared to factory loads?
 
Must be the powder.

Have him try Varget, IMR-4064, or IMR-4895.

Lyman #49 shows those three powders giving over 3,100 FPS with a 55 grain V-Max in a 15" T/C Encore.

The max load of Varget gave 3,263 FPS!

rc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top