Polar Express
Member
Well, I finally did it, and ordered my pair of Savage Rifles. I sold my other gun, and had a few more clams stashed to make the purchase.
a .308 and a 300 WinMag.
Now, I need to put some optics on them.
My initial plan was to go with Leupold VX-II scopes, with the LR duplex reticle. I compared them with the Nikon Monarch, and liked them both, with similar price points. I have read the feedback here and on other forums, and while Nikon has a great warranty as well, the general feedback was that Leupold was easier to deal with if you had an issue.
So, I wanted to put a 3-9x40 on the .308, and a 4-12x50 on the WinMag.
But then I started to wonder: Do I NEED to spend that much $ on scopes? I'm not a competetion shooter, I got these to hunt with. And, unless I want to submerge myself into the long range shooting sport, I suspect it won't matter. Besides, my 90 year old neighbor took Moose in Canada so long ago that I think Moses was still tending sheep. And, today's bottom tier optics blow his stuff away.
So, the dilemma is, at what point do I stop spending money to get the 'next-better' product, and just go out and enjoy chasing Bambi?
Right now, I sure like the price point of those Redfields, and I can get both a 3-9, and a 4-12, but both in the 40mm bell. Leupold makes Redfield, and I suspect they will be just as easy to deal with if/when I have a warranty need.
Anyone out there have some ideas or experience with the 'new' Redfield scopes?
PE
a .308 and a 300 WinMag.
Now, I need to put some optics on them.
My initial plan was to go with Leupold VX-II scopes, with the LR duplex reticle. I compared them with the Nikon Monarch, and liked them both, with similar price points. I have read the feedback here and on other forums, and while Nikon has a great warranty as well, the general feedback was that Leupold was easier to deal with if you had an issue.
So, I wanted to put a 3-9x40 on the .308, and a 4-12x50 on the WinMag.
But then I started to wonder: Do I NEED to spend that much $ on scopes? I'm not a competetion shooter, I got these to hunt with. And, unless I want to submerge myself into the long range shooting sport, I suspect it won't matter. Besides, my 90 year old neighbor took Moose in Canada so long ago that I think Moses was still tending sheep. And, today's bottom tier optics blow his stuff away.
So, the dilemma is, at what point do I stop spending money to get the 'next-better' product, and just go out and enjoy chasing Bambi?
Right now, I sure like the price point of those Redfields, and I can get both a 3-9, and a 4-12, but both in the 40mm bell. Leupold makes Redfield, and I suspect they will be just as easy to deal with if/when I have a warranty need.
Anyone out there have some ideas or experience with the 'new' Redfield scopes?
PE