Scout Rifle Project

Status
Not open for further replies.

joshuarwright

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2009
Messages
49
I am in the market for a new rifle, I have been looking at Finnish M39s a lot, as anyone who has seen my posts will know, but I want a project and don't feel like breaking into an M39.

Being that I love the Scout Rifle idea, as defined by Jeff Cooper, I wanted to start with a basic .308 rifle and work from there. Price isn't too big of a deal because I have patience, but bear in mind that it doesn't need to be the best .308 out there because never would I go over 400 meters with it.

I wanted to ask what you guys think would be the best base. What .308 rifles do you own and recommend for this project?
 
The cheapest and easiest "Scout" is made using an M38 Mosin carbine. The ammo is good and plentiful and the conversion is easily acoomplished.
 
Oh I meant more along the lines of not milsurp. in general. Otherwise I would still be going for the M39.
 
If you want to make Scout weight, as defined by Col. Cooper, in a turnbolt rifle, well, it will take money. My budget near-scout is a Browning Takedown BLR in .308, when I can afford the mount and scope. My beloved Boston Terrier girl just cost me $800 at the vet, so the scope and mount will have to wait a bit. The rifle ran $650 pre-owned, and with its alloy receiver, is fairly lightweight. The takedown BLRs are D&T'ed for a forward mount, which is available from Browning for around fifty bucks.
 
Rexster: how is Browning as far as reliability in your experience? as far as weight goes it is the one place where I was ready to give leeway, but most scouts fall short on back-up irons and that was one thing I require.
 
scope-bot.jpg


I'd go for a Savage 110 from a pawn shop in 308 Win. Then, install XS/Clifton Scout Scope Mount. Many folks agree that a good scout setup has iron sights, often a peep, as a backup. XS has those on their website too.

http://www.xssights.com/store/scope.html
 
I have the Gibbs Quest rifle [SMLE] in the picture above.I can hit the large or small gong at the 200 yard bench with boring regularity, useing hand loads or factory.Not a pleasant rifle to shoot,however.
 
from going to the Savage website I was looking at the Stevens 200, is Stevens just Savage without AccuStuff?

What wasn't pleasant about the Gibbs Quest?
 
joshuawright, I have not used my older BLR Lightning under really bad conditions, but it feeds reliably. I have yet to fire my Takedown BLR. On another forum, at Leverguns.com, there is a current topic on BLR reliability. Someone posted a reference that was secondhand information, about two with problems, and members posted plenty of replies attesting to their BLRs performing well over time.
 
I was looking at the Stevens 200, is Stevens just Savage without AccuStuff?

Correct. But, for the price of a new Stevens, you can find a used Savage 110 with a wood stock. The wood performs better than the flimsy plastic stock supplied with the new Stevens rifle....and you may get lucky & find one with an accu-trigger.
 
Last edited:
I liked the good Colonel's idea too, until I tried it. I found I just don't like an optic out in front of the bolt.

I don't know if you have handled a Scout setup or not already, but you may want to before spending $... I wish I had.
 
Rod, I actually was turned onto the idea when I fired my friends M38 with a forward mounted scope. But thank you for the advice, I could see myself easily mistaking coolness for usefullness haha.

Abel, I think regardless I would update the stock somehow, whether for weight or for quality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top