Sig P232 for a general everyday gun?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Triggernosis

Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
500
Any opinions, both positive or negative, on the Sig P232? I went to the local gunshop intent on picking up a Bersa .380, but made the mistake of handling a Sig P232 and now want one of those instead...at double the price of the Bersa, of course.
It just seemed to point so naturally in my hand. Please talk me into or out of it. It's expensive and I'm just wondering if I'm passing up something else that may serve me just as well.
 
Any opinions, both positive or negative, on the Sig P232? I went to the local gunshop intent on picking up a Bersa .380, but made the mistake of handling a Sig P232 and now want one of those instead...at double the price of the Bersa, of course.
It just seemed to point so naturally in my hand. Please talk me into or out of it. It's expensive and I'm just wondering if I'm passing up something else that may serve me just as well.

I had the older Sig P230, the predecessor of the 232. If you're in the market for a .380, the Sig is probably one of the best. If I had to make a choice between Bersa or Sig, I'd take the Sig every time.
 
If I had to make a choice between Bersa or Sig, I'd take the Sig every time.

Yeah me too, but.... The Bersa is half the price. They are both awesome guns, but the 232 is pretty much a superior gun all in all.
 
get the bersa with the CT laser grip for about 400.00 and do yourself a great favor you'll be glad you did.
 
It just seemed to point so naturally in my hand. Please talk me into or out of it. It's expensive and I'm just wondering if I'm passing up something else that may serve me just as well.

I would choose it over the Bersa but is it twice the gun? I don't know.

I had one for awhile and loved it but when I wanted a .45 I traded it a kept my BDA. I do know this the P232 held its value and you will do well in a trade because of the SIG name.

I loved the way it pointed and felt and I liked the sights better than what's on the BDA.
 
I won't talk you out of it. Your hand is telling you something important. Pointability is big feature of a carry gun, the benefit obvious. The Sig P232 is a world class gun, so if you can afford it, go for it. If it is a stretch, save up up a few hundred dollars.;)

The .380acp is a competent defensive round, the gun is perfect, holsters are easy to find...what's not to like.

I admit it...I'm a bit biased. I love this gun! ;)

siggroup003.jpg
 
usp9, that SS version with the wood grips is purty! BTW, what magazine is that on the middle-right one?
 
I have an all Exeter made, all stainless P232 and it is a great gun. Very solid and well built to stand up to a lifetime of frequent shooting. As you've discovered, it is a very comfortable and natural fitting pistol. Mine has been wholly reliable and accurate.

The alloy framed versions are significantly lighter then the all stainless (they all have stainless slides though) - something to consider before you buy. I like the stainless frame specifically for it's heft - I do not like very lightweight guns.
 
The SIG is an excellent firearm and one that you'd be pleased to hand down to a son or daughter in time. You can't say that about every firearm that's out there. If you are craving a pistol in that size and caliber, you can do a lot worse than the SIG -- and you can't do a whole lot better.
 
Here's a review I did of the Sig P232 a while back...

Note: My attitude towards the P232 has changed considerably since I bought it. I like it. It is well built and easy to maintain. It is actually quite accurate though being blowback operated the recoil is quite a bit more stout than one would think. I do not recommend it as a general everyday gun. There are many handguns that are easier to shoot, that fit more naturally in the hand, are chambered in more effective calibers and have much less felt recoil. The P232 is a BUG just like SIG says it is.

Summary: Nice gun now that I'm more familiar with it. Light. I don't recommend it for CCW normal use. Backup gun. It's a nice change at the range.

Sig P232 - German Manufactured
Purchase Price: $576
Caliber: .380 ACP
Ammunition: WWB .380 Auto
Target: Caldwell 8" Bullseye Shoot'n C
Temp: 90F +
Wind: 8 - 12 MPH WSW (from behind and right of the shooter)
Date: 7/12/09

After purchasing the P232 I performed my normal NIB inspection, clean and lube. I was impressed with the fit and finish of the pistol. No slack in the slide, no nicks, mars, rubs or any other visible blemishes in the finish. The grip, though small, fit well in my hand (or so I thought). I thought the pistol felt a bit heavy for a .380 (or so I thought). 1st impressions were favorable and met my expectations. I had purchased the pistol as lightweight low recoil (or so I thought) gun for my wife to carry when she didn't want to lug around her full size CZ-75B.

The P232 is a blowback operated pistol, has a 3.6" barrel and weighs in at 17.6 oz with a 7 round mag inserted.The trigger is a DA/SA and is horrible. 9.3# DA pull and so much travel and creep when the trigger finally does start to engage in the SA pull that one wonders if the guy who designed that trigger was maybe working for the competition when he did so.

Here's what the P232 looks like.

http://www.sigsauer.com/upFiles/catalog/product/P232-detail-L.jpg[/url]

The 1st thing I do after acquiring a new gun is the aforementioned inspection followed by a clean and lube. The P232 is remarkably easy to take down and compared to a standard recoil action pistol has way fewer parts to mess with. Taking the P232 down is not without its hazards however. While taking the slide off I bumped the slide latch and the attached spring went flying. It now resides in the realm of lost springs as even after a 15 minute search by myself and conscripting my wife to help for another 15 minutes that little sucker was no where to be found. So I finished the clean and lube, a very quick and simple operation, reassembled and set to trying to find a replacement spring.

Numrich had a slide latch spring for $6.30. Ordered it on a Sunday - had it by Wednesday. Thought about it and called Sig since the schematic in the manual for my P232 didn't match the one that Numrich showed - maybe their part would be for an older version. Sig asked about the S/N in order to determine manufacture date since there have been some recent changes. Told the rep the part I needed. $5 part but Sig has a $30 minimum order. The rep told me that really wasn't a problem. He sent me 3, no charge! Ordered on Monday and received on Friday. I've heard a lot of bad things said about Sig service - sure could fool me - because I got good service from 'em.

After installing the spring on a Friday evening and function checking the pistol the wife and I decided Sunday morning would be the best time to go and put the P232 through its paces.

Arrived at the TriCityGunClub range around 9:30AM. The sun was blazing in a clear blue sky and it was already hot. The pistol range was in use by 2 other groups of shooters set up at either end of the range so I selected a bench near the center. I brought the P232 with 100 rounds of WWB .380 90gr and a CZ-7B 9mm with 100 rounds of S&B 115gr. Set it all down and plopped down into a chair in no real hurry for the range to go cold. Wife remained in the car with all 4 windows rolled down, the radio making noise and iced water well within reach.

After a bit the current shooters needed to put up new targets and down they went along with my self. I set up 4 8" bullseye shoot'n see targets at 10 yards. Loaded up the two mags that came with the P232, 7 rounds each. The range went hot and I took up the pistol using a standard Weaver stance, aimed carefully and fired my 1st shot.

Whoaaaa! That's a really snappy and hard recoil for a .380 (more about that later). Surprise - Surprise. 1st shot hit paper about 3" from the bull at 10 o'clock. OK. No more suprises. WRONG! Not one of the next 6 shots hit paper.

ARRRRRRGGGGHGHGHHGHG!

I do not suck at pistol shooting! It must be the gun but it's a SIG. What are the odds of me getting a lemon right out of the box? Not high. Right?

Sooooo - I loaded 15 rounds into a CZ-75 mag, inserted same into said Cz-75, took up my standard stance and commenced firing at a clean target. 12 of 15 rounds went right into the X ring with the 3 others not far off.

IT WARN'T ME! IT HAD TO BE THE P232!

I was steamed. Set down the CZ and started glaring at the P232. POS! After a bit I started to calm down and began to wonder what could be going on? Hmmmm... smaller grip, way lighter pistol. Felt recoil very high in my experience for such a small cartridge. Even Makarov's I've fired didn't have the felt recoil of the P232. Thought about it for a bit and decided I'd have to adjust to the smaller grip and very snappy and sharp recoil.

Targets still at 10 yards, I loaded up 2 more mags. Dropped into my shooting stance. Concentrated on grip, trigger pull, sight picture and subsequent recovery. 7 rounds fired and 7 on paper - but all over it. Tried again with 2nd mag. 7 rounds on paper with most inside the 6" ring. Getting better. Loaded up two more mags and repeated. By the 4th mag I was getting 4 of 7 into the X ring with the other 3 being a 1/2" or less outside the X ring at 10 o'clock. OK the thing shoots left and a bit high from the factory (wind was from the right but no way that accounted for the tendency to shoot a bit left). Windage on the P232 can be adjusted by loosening an allen screw on the rear sight. I didn't have my allen wrenches with me so I didn't get to adjust the windage. Height - ehhh - not adjustable as far as I know without replacing the front sight.

Range went cold. I moved the targets into 7 yards and repeated the above performance, improving with each additional mag.

I then loaded up two more mags and had my wife fire them. SHE was not impressed. With the CZ she can keep 15 rounds on paper at 7 yards. With the P232 she got 1 round on paper. She most definitely did not like the recoil and consistently shot high. The grip was way too small for her hands, even one handed - she has long fingers - and she made a point that the grip was just too small for her.

Left the range. Cleaned and lubed pistol. Only thing out of the ordinary was that the outside of the barrel was blackened for about 2" from the crown and back. I have never seen that occur on any of the many recoil operated pistols I own. Maybe that is normal for a blowback operated pistol. Not a big deal in any event.

If one is used to full size auto pistols as I am it will take many, many hours and hundreds if not thousands of rounds to become proficient with a P232. I have no doubt that with practice one could consistently get 4" to 6" groups at 25 yards with it but it would take practice. If one is used to small grip, very light (though compared to other .380's I've researched the P232 is relatively heavy) pistols one may be able to shoot the P232 accurately right out of the box. I couldn't. It took me almost an hour before I could put 7 of 7 in the bull. I have no confidence I could shoot the P232 that well in a high stress, self defense situation.

I ended up liking the P232, wife hates it.

Summary: SIG describes the P232 as a backup gun in its product description. That about says it all. The P232 is not appropriate for use as a primary CCW pistol in most cases IMO. I can imagine it being used in a situation where deep concealment is a necessity for non LEO CCW or as a purse gun for the ladies. I cannot imagine myself ever carrying one. The P232 seems a bit large for ankle or pocket carry (I've never done either so I may be mistaken in that judgement) and the very snappy recoil combined with its lightweight make its use beyond 10 yards or so in a high stress, self defense situation questionable by any but someone who has practiced extensively with it.

My P232 will be spending most of its time in the safe, being brought out only as a range gun and only when I am in the mood for something different.[/quote]
 
Last edited:
Thanks, Werewolf. Just curious - what are some other similarly-sized guns in .380 or 9mm that you would recommend over the P232?
 
BTW, what magazine is that on the middle-right one?

The magazine is just a standard mag, however the doohicky poking out at the base of the grip is a lanyard loop. The P230 is a bit different in that it was made for a police agency, is equiped with a safety and is a .32acp, not .380. The mag holds 8 rounds.

(they all have stainless slides though)

No, some have carbon steel slides.
 
Triggernosis said:
Thanks, Werewolf. Just curious - what are some other similarly-sized guns in .380 or 9mm that you would recommend over the P232?

You'll have to get the .380 ACP rec from others. The Sig P232 is the 1st .380 ACP gun I purchased. It is the only .380 I own. I wouldn't have bought it at all except my wife wanted something to carry around that was lighter and had less recoil than her CZ-75B in 9mm.

The P232 is lighter but has much more recoil as I detailed in the review so it turned into my gun.

To be honest if you are looking for a general purpose handgun I wouldn't recommend the .380 at all for reasons noted in the previous post re: more effective calibers fired out of more comfortable platforms. For a 1st general purpose handgun that can fill the roles of plinker, range gun, self defense gun, and home defense gun I'd go with something like a CZ-75 or Glock 17/19. Both are relatively inexpensive, easy to maintain and the CZ-75 is exceptionally accurate for a stock gun and the price you'll pay.

On the other hand I'm a big fan of any handgun in .40 S&W but some folks don't care for the rather snappy recoil. Any of the Kimber line in 9mm would make a fine general purpose handgun but they're on the pricey side.

S&W makes some very fine revolvers in 38Spl/.357Mag. I am partial to the 686 line.

And finally you can't go wrong with a 1911 .45ACP - really - you just can't.
 
The magazine is just a standard mag, however the doohicky poking out at the base of the grip is a lanyard loop. The P230 is a bit different in that it was made for a police agency, is equiped with a safety and is a .32acp, not .380. The mag holds 8 rounds.



No, some have carbon steel slides.
None of the current production P232's have carbon slides. Like all SIGs, they all have stainless slides, blackened (Nitron coated) or not.

Perhaps used ones had carbon slides, but not new ones.
 
One more vote for the Sig here. I carry one everyday for a backup, on the ankle. I do carry it as a primary sometimes too though. (Mine is the P230 .380 ACP.) I won't say anything negative about the Bersa, my mother-in-law bought one after having tried my Sig and for the money saved she went with the Bersa. It seems to run fine too. (At age 53 she is a recent convert into the world of firearms ownership, I'm very proud of her.) I just like that little Sig better myself though.
 
None of the current production P232's have carbon slides. Like all SIGs, they all have stainless slides, blackened (Nitron coated) or not.

I wonder then what accounts for the difference in weight between the all blue model and the two tone? Wouldn't they weigh the same if the frames are identical and the slides the same except for the finish? Hmmm... I think the slides were indeed different.
 
Last edited:
That could well be true now that the P232 is on it's latest model changes and made in the U.S. Either way it's a great pistol.
 
My daily carry is a Sig P230 in a High Noon Bare Asset Holster. I, like you, made the mistake of holding one while looking at ccw guns. Does the Sig need to be twice as good as the Bersa to be worth twice as much? No not at all, for a defensive pistol BETTER and COST are not a one to one comparison. I would take the Sig over the Bersa for many times more the price. The differences are worth it to me, considering what it is I am purchasing.
 
I recently purchased a P238 and can tell you that my particular copy is one if the absolute best pistols I own regardless of price. I was looking at a Bersa with the CT laser grip yesterday and it's a very handsome pistol and at 399.00 at Academy - it's THE 380 to get. I have a non laser variety and it's a great pistol. The only 380 I can recommend you get over the Bersa is the P238.
 
I own the Bersa and the P232, my choice would be the Sig without question.
However if your on a budget the Bersa is nice too.
 
Sig 232 is a nice gun. It is a Sig after all. The .380 will do the job but often you can get either deep penetration (fmj for instance) or expansion. Usually not both. Although some of the new loads show promise. I carry the Hornady XTP in my P-AT. In gel test it goes 8-10 inches and expands to around .45 caliber. I think the slightly bigger 239 in 9mm is a much better EDC gun. Or if you must .357 Sig or .40. Not much larger and quite a bit more powerful. JMHO.
 
BTW I've owned PPK's over the years and a Bersa. The Bersa has a better trigger and is more reliable than the PPK's I've owned. At about half the price.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.