Jed Carter
Member
Used pistol with recoil spring installed backwards, worn extractor, would be my guess.
I went ahead and ordered a 3 pack of the new spring which costs $12 and some change but the shipping charge is high. I think he said around $15 for shipping.
I took it to the range and immediately found an issue. I had purchased several sig mags to go with it, and I found that the extra mags were different then the one mag that came with it.
This isn't acase of a failed part, my recoil spring hasn't broken and when I needed to replace my P3AT recoil springs I had topay for them.Sheesh, my Kel-Tec P3AT cost half as much, and when the extractor broke they dropped one in the mail to me for free!
I knew I had read in my Owner's Manual for the P238 about the proper way to install the recol spring. It is on page 38 at the bottom of the page. There is a box stating:Savagesig's post prompted me to retrieve the instruction manual to my Sig P238. I have heard enough about the necessity of putting the P 238's recoil spring on correctly that I felt sure the manual would state that to be the case.
To my surprise, it did not.
Which is very odd. To be sure, it didn't say anything about removing the spring from the guide rod, but since there is no real attachment (other than it is held captive by the rod and it's position in the gun when assembled) between the rod & spring, it would appear to me that the writers did not plan the manual appropriatly. The spring is clearly larger on one side than the other, and there certainly must be a reason for this, as other semi autos I possess have normal tubular springs, not conical shaped ones.
The small end should be against the base of the guide, and the large end abuts the muzzle end of the gun.
In the OP's photos, this appears to have been reversed, as earlier posters have said. Now, I don't know how this happened, but if it was Sig that did it, they should stand up and repair or replace the weapon as necessary to make the OP whole again.
I believe the Sig P 238 is a good design, and when properly assembled and maintained will be perfectly suitable for self defense or plinking, or whatever is a suitable purpose for a small .380ACP weapon. Remember that when the slide retracts, the barrel will tilt down on the cam, and if it is tilting down on the fat end of the spring, it will scrunch the spring, which seems to be what happened in the OP's post. If the barrel tilts down on a properly aligned spring, there's plenty of space and nothing bad happens. Atleast, IMHO that is how things are working in this gun.
This mainspring issue is a bit of an oddball type of thing, but other guns do also have their quirks.
But, shame shame on Sig for NOT being MORE EXPLICIT(!!!) in their manual!!!!!
Ruger1228 said:I knew I had read in my Owner's Manual for the P238 about the proper way to install the recol spring. It is on page 38 at the bottom of the page. There is a box stating:
"IMPORTANT: Make sure the wide end of the spring is inserted into the slide first with the narrow end on the guide. Installing the spring backwards will result in damage to the spring box. To ensure optimal performance, the Recoil Spring should be replaced every 1,500 rounds.
I did look at the PDF manual that Sig has on their website and the is NOT on that manual. Maybe they decided they needed to put this into the manual after they had so many complaints about the Recoil Spring.
LightingMan said:Tommygunn said:The spring is clearly larger on one side than the other, and there certainly must be a reason for this, as other semi autos I possess have normal tubular springs, not conical shaped ones.
The reason I suspect is so the spring can compress a bit more than a spring the is the same diameter front to back. This spring has to compress down to about 1/2 an inch, or so. When I got to messing around looking for some sort of replacement spring, I tried fitting a straight length heavier wire spring, but every time I got it in place, it wouldn't work. I could not pull the slide back far enough to lock it open. (couldn't compress the spring enough) I gave up on that idea. LM