Fast Frank
Member
Here we go with another shooting.
And we know there's gonna be more attacks on the second amendment.
And we know that whatever the grabbers do isn't going to make any difference at all as far as mass shooting go.
So, why don't we propose something that might?
In the most recent case, the guy was prohibited from buying by his dishonorable discharge, but he had a Ruger AR.
Now we go back to the "Gunshow Loophole" nonsense. As if that would make a difference.
I have an idea, and I figured I would fly it here to see if it's workable.
Why not put a mark on the drivers license that says "Prohibited from buying or having guns"?
Now, when I want to legally sell my gun online or at a gun show all I have to do is ask to see the license.
No license? No sale. Marked as prohibited? Now I can avoid arming a prohibited person.
Why not? Why would anybody have a problem with this idea?
Maybe if we could get the grabbers on board we could actually do a little good instead of just stomping on the second amendment.
And we know there's gonna be more attacks on the second amendment.
And we know that whatever the grabbers do isn't going to make any difference at all as far as mass shooting go.
So, why don't we propose something that might?
In the most recent case, the guy was prohibited from buying by his dishonorable discharge, but he had a Ruger AR.
Now we go back to the "Gunshow Loophole" nonsense. As if that would make a difference.
I have an idea, and I figured I would fly it here to see if it's workable.
Why not put a mark on the drivers license that says "Prohibited from buying or having guns"?
Now, when I want to legally sell my gun online or at a gun show all I have to do is ask to see the license.
No license? No sale. Marked as prohibited? Now I can avoid arming a prohibited person.
Why not? Why would anybody have a problem with this idea?
Maybe if we could get the grabbers on board we could actually do a little good instead of just stomping on the second amendment.