Harold Mayo
Member
While I've never really had much of a use for this round (I still think of it as a "newcomer"), I've recently been thinking that I would get at least one pistol chambered for it. I've had a Glock 23, Glock 22, Sig P229, and a BHP chambered in it and really didn't care for the recoil in any but the P229 (which was a soft-recoiling gun overall...very nice). I've been thinking of picking up another P229, probably a CPO gun, but there are some other offerings out there that weren't available when I messed with these other guns.
Specifically, what do you guys think of the S&W M&P in .40 S&W and the Springfield XD in the same caliber (and the different permutations of each gun)? I have heard that the M&P was actually originally designed around the round and that the 9mm version came from that rather than the other way around, as was the case with Glocks, and so the M&P handles the .40 a little better. I didn't like the recoil of the G23 I had. The G22 was ok but still not to my liking and a friend has actually had the breech face crack in his (Glock took care of him but the fact that it happened to someone I know rather than an anonymous internet guy is significant to me).
Any 1st hand experience with most or all of the above?
Specifically, what do you guys think of the S&W M&P in .40 S&W and the Springfield XD in the same caliber (and the different permutations of each gun)? I have heard that the M&P was actually originally designed around the round and that the 9mm version came from that rather than the other way around, as was the case with Glocks, and so the M&P handles the .40 a little better. I didn't like the recoil of the G23 I had. The G22 was ok but still not to my liking and a friend has actually had the breech face crack in his (Glock took care of him but the fact that it happened to someone I know rather than an anonymous internet guy is significant to me).
Any 1st hand experience with most or all of the above?