I picked up a gun rag the other night, and skimmed an article about having a handgun "battery".
The author says he wants an "always" gun, ie: NAA .22 or Seecamp .32, etc.
Also wants a "pocket gun", as in .38 snub.
Ok so far.
Next, he says we need a compact carry gun, and he lists a couple of "officer-sized" .45s.
Then to round out his collection, he says you need a full size, service weapon, and lists a couple of 1911-style guns.
Here is my question:
If you have a compact gun with 5 or 6 shots, that is accurate, why do you need a full-size gun that only adds 1 or two shots?
Many of the compact guns are as accurate, or more so, than the full size guns.
I've seen several tests where the smallest Glocks shoot smaller groups than the full size guns. At least with a full size Glock, you add quite a few more rounds.
My "compact" gun is a S&W 457, which holds 7+1 rounds of .45.
I don't see any advantage to have a much larger, heavier, 1911 gun that would hold the same amount of rounds.
So, again, why do you need the full size handgun, if it only adds .5" barrel and 1 or 2 more rounds?
Or is the guy just writing something so he can draw a paycheck, and the publisher can get you to pony up $9?
I'm truly seeking enlightenment here.
The author says he wants an "always" gun, ie: NAA .22 or Seecamp .32, etc.
Also wants a "pocket gun", as in .38 snub.
Ok so far.
Next, he says we need a compact carry gun, and he lists a couple of "officer-sized" .45s.
Then to round out his collection, he says you need a full size, service weapon, and lists a couple of 1911-style guns.
Here is my question:
If you have a compact gun with 5 or 6 shots, that is accurate, why do you need a full-size gun that only adds 1 or two shots?
Many of the compact guns are as accurate, or more so, than the full size guns.
I've seen several tests where the smallest Glocks shoot smaller groups than the full size guns. At least with a full size Glock, you add quite a few more rounds.
My "compact" gun is a S&W 457, which holds 7+1 rounds of .45.
I don't see any advantage to have a much larger, heavier, 1911 gun that would hold the same amount of rounds.
So, again, why do you need the full size handgun, if it only adds .5" barrel and 1 or 2 more rounds?
Or is the guy just writing something so he can draw a paycheck, and the publisher can get you to pony up $9?
I'm truly seeking enlightenment here.