SP101

Status
Not open for further replies.
You could be right for a 5 round 41 Special, but the frame is not likely to be rated adequate for magnum pressures. My 41 Special is a GP100, but that was big enough for 6 rounds. Before 41 Special happens at the manufacturer level, ammo manufacturers have to get involved with a commercial ammo offering. We saw that with 327 Federal Magnum, for example. At least Starline offers the brass.
I think the reason for not having the SP in 41 is the cylinder cannot be drilled out any further for a bigger caliber or else you'd have to go down to a four shot, hence the 41 in the GP100, larger frame and all.
 
I had the Hogue Monogrip on the SPNY I used to have. It was good on there, but the Monogrip on the full size GP100 is way to big. It’s even worse on the 3” GP100 b
 
Not sure I could get used to a hammerless revolver. It's purty though.
A DAO revolver forces you to practice DA which is how you would most likely shoot in a defensive situation. I enjoy shooting SA too but don't see the need for it for self defense.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0752 (2).JPG
    IMG_0752 (2).JPG
    144.3 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_1678 (3).JPG
    IMG_1678 (3).JPG
    98.1 KB · Views: 11
A DAO revolver forces you to practice DA

Personally, I don't need a DAO revolver to force me to practice DA shooting. DA shooting can be accomplished just as effectively with a conventional double-action revolver. As I see it, the only reason to have a "hammerless" (spurless) revolver is to lessen the chance of the revolver snagging on the draw-and that's reason enough to have one (or more :)).

I enjoy shooting SA too but don't see the need for it for self defense.

Even in a self-defense scenario, it's not hard to conjure up reasons, albeit atypical, when being able to shoot a DA revolver in the SA mode would be advantageous. And the chance of a DA revolver snagging on the draw can be largely obviated by keeping the ball of the thumb on the spur of the hammer. There really aren't many downsides to a conventional double-action revolver when comparing it to a DAO revolver.
 
Personally, I don't need a DAO revolver to force me to practice DA shooting. DA shooting can be accomplished just as effectively with a conventional double-action revolver. As I see it, the only reason to have a "hammerless" (spurless) revolver is to lessen the chance of the revolver snagging on the draw-and that's reason enough to have one (or more :)).



Even in a self-defense scenario, it's not hard to conjure up reasons, albeit atypical, when being able to shoot a DA revolver in the SA mode would be advantageous. And the chance of a DA revolver snagging on the draw can be largely obviated by keeping the ball of the thumb on the spur of the hammer. There really aren't many downsides to a conventional double-action revolver when comparing it to a DAO revolver.
True on all counts but I also could conjure up a scenario where cocking the hammer in a defensive situation could lead to an accidental discharge. Maybe I should've said, "My DAO revolvers force ME to practice DA only." Occasionally I go back to shooting SA when struggling DA when I bring a DA/SA revolver. Can't do that with my DAO. I enjoy both DAO and DA/SA.
 
It has a spurless hammer. I can cock the hammer spring via the long trigger press, hold it there to finalize aim then fire it with a short press.
you are not cocking the hammer by using the trigger no matter if you think you are or not... you are still using double action- just a modified trigger pull. unless coverted internally a DAO revolveris usually just a bobbed hammer that could indeedbe "cocked by setting the hammer manually... true single action revolver the hammer will stay to the rearuntil a shorter n usually lighter trigger pull releases the hammer to fall.
 
As I see it, the only reason to have a "hammerless" (spurless) revolver is to lessen the chance of the revolver snagging on the draw
Another reason is to reduce the risk that a prosecutor of plaintiff will try to claim that a shooting was unintentional.
 
you are not cocking the hammer by using the trigger no matter if you think you are or not... you are still using double action- just a modified trigger pull. unless coverted internally a DAO revolveris usually just a bobbed hammer that could indeedbe "cocked by setting the hammer manually... true single action revolver the hammer will stay to the rearuntil a shorter n usually lighter trigger pull releases the hammer to fall.

Fair enough..let me rephrase it...I can stage the hammer reliably to the ready position.
 
I've had a 9mm 3" SP101 for some years. It handles any and all 9mm ammunition I've tried without issue. Ballistics out of the little 3" barrel often equal or exceed what my 4" and 5" semi-autos produce. That is contrary to what common sense might suggest, but that is what the chronograph consistently indicates......

I've used Hogue rubber, nylon and wood grips. The wood is best looking, but both slicker and fatter than the rubber and nylon versions. The nylon doesn't stick to clothing, but even though textured, feel rather slick compared to the rubber Hogues. The rubber Hogues on are the ones I've left on the gun...

View attachment 1017996
Yours is a 4.5” barrel once you add the length of the cylinder
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top