Roselli makes blades over 8" long at RC 64-66 using plain old carbon steel with a carbon content of ~2.0%. (Twice the carbon of 1095). They stay sharper, longer, but also harder to sharpen and more brittle. Not so different from ZDP at RC65 (main difference being the presence of carbides that can affect sharpness and edge wear). When someone can make a 1/8" machete out of martensitic steel at RC65, then I'll consider that a super steel. ZDP is just another extreme compromise for a niche market. When that stops selling, someone will add 1% magic ingredient to it and call it something else.
High quality razor blades and microtomes with primary edge angles in the 10 degree range should be winning sharpness contests. I don't know what CATRA measures, but it isn't ultimate sharpness. You said the knife was hand sharpened, and that says it all. Sharpness comes from the way the knife is sharpened, not the steel. People were shaving with bronze razors centuries ago.
I don't care what steel it is. If it's "surgical stainless," made in China, made in Pakistan, it doesn't matter. Gimme a belt sander and a stone/hone, and I will put a shaving edge on the knife in no time flat.
If someone with the time, money, and determination wants to prove that D2 is the sharpness steel in existence, they'll win a contest, too. They'll find or create a contest where the sharpness criteria will favor their personal choice, and tada. Winner. Winning a sharpness contest at SHOT show is no different than a pooch winning best-in-show at a dog pageant. If there was a significant difference, the same knife would win the SHOT show contest year after year.