Compared to common semiauto pistol rounds. Not compared to other rifle rounds.But how did 223 become "a somewhat heavy recoiling expensive rifle round"?
Compared to common semiauto pistol rounds. Not compared to other rifle rounds.But how did 223 become "a somewhat heavy recoiling expensive rifle round"?
Think about the fact that eternity is only a heartbeat away and how you're going to explain your "need" to buy a Kel-Tec pistol to the man on the great white throne as opposed to the many other things you could have done with that money.
↑
Think about the fact that eternity is only a heartbeat away and how you're going to explain your "need" to buy a Kel-Tec pistol to the man on the great white throne as opposed to the many other things you could have done with that money.
Huh?
Seriously?
That is as off-the-wall as it gets..... explaining why you bought an item you wanted instead of needed to the man upstairs.
I mean, really?
Compared to common semiauto pistol rounds. Not compared to other rifle rounds.
My thoughts exactly.Is this going to be your first handgun? Post 13 makes it sound like you don't own any other handguns. If so any .223 handgun is not a good choice. A rifle chopped to handgun length does put the gun in the same category as a typical handgun. Any practicality associated with the fact it's a common round is greatly outweighed by impractical nature of the gun.
the .223/5.56 is smaller than most pistol rounds and cost about the same as .40 or 45ACP.
To the OP, if you are willing to take a gamble and spend $500 (without regret I might add) for a novelty/range gun, then go for it. I don't see any issue with that as long as you know the downsides already.
If you want to spend that money more reasonably on a reliable gun, get a Glock 9/40/45 instead.
Sorry I can't own a glock, it's not American enough.