Mosin77
Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2019
- Messages
- 1,592
I have often, often read of the great necessity for “drop free” magazines, and with this, the idea that it’s necessary to carry magazines for quick reloads, and that it’s necessary to practice these techniques so one can quickly reload one’s pistol in a combat situation.
As a civilian, I’ve long been more than a bit skeptical.
1. If you’re not in the military or police, your gun serves more to buy you time than it does to administer justice, so the odds you’ll be in a protracted engagement (vs, say, firing some shots and then running) are less.
2. If your situation can’t be resolved with the ammo on hand in your (presumably full) magazine, are more shots really going to help? You can of course argue that the 6+1 in your LCP can hardly be expected to settle all possible threats…. But most people who believe in tactical reloads don’t really apply this to their deep concealment hold out gun, but to their G19 or other more substantial pistol, thus still begging the question. If you can’t do it in 15+1…… or maybe 15+1 + 6+1…..
3. If you are in the military, or are a civilian practicing for military style scenarios (civil unrest, defense of land and liberty, etc) it makes a lot more sense to practice tactical reloads with the weapon you will actually be using: your rifle. I think most of those with military experience would probably say that if you have to reload your sidearm, a secondary, emergency weapon, in combat in a hurry, you’re probably in deep kimchi.
4. I can, however, see one very clear reason for tactical pistol reloads: LEO/police officers, who might reasonably expect to engage in gunfights with criminals, and be armed only with their duty sidearm.
The problem is, for a civilian, drop-free mags are kind of a pain when reloading at the range because they risk damage to the most sensitive component of the firearm -the magazine, with its relatively delicate feed lips, follower, spring, etc. Civilians have to buy new ones from their own pocket and can’t necessarily put another hundred rounds through those mags that just hit the dirt, to make sure their tumble to earth didn’t impede reliability.
Easily pressed mag releases also seem great in the context of the tactical reload at the range, but aren’t so great for the civilian carrier, who depends on his mag to actually be in the gun when he needs it. They have an annoying habit of getting pressed, and then the magazine either departs the gun and might get lost completely, or is at least dislodged, rendering the gun potentially inoperable at a critical moment.
What say you? Do you practice tactical reloads? Think they’re a bit overrated?
As a civilian, I’ve long been more than a bit skeptical.
1. If you’re not in the military or police, your gun serves more to buy you time than it does to administer justice, so the odds you’ll be in a protracted engagement (vs, say, firing some shots and then running) are less.
2. If your situation can’t be resolved with the ammo on hand in your (presumably full) magazine, are more shots really going to help? You can of course argue that the 6+1 in your LCP can hardly be expected to settle all possible threats…. But most people who believe in tactical reloads don’t really apply this to their deep concealment hold out gun, but to their G19 or other more substantial pistol, thus still begging the question. If you can’t do it in 15+1…… or maybe 15+1 + 6+1…..
3. If you are in the military, or are a civilian practicing for military style scenarios (civil unrest, defense of land and liberty, etc) it makes a lot more sense to practice tactical reloads with the weapon you will actually be using: your rifle. I think most of those with military experience would probably say that if you have to reload your sidearm, a secondary, emergency weapon, in combat in a hurry, you’re probably in deep kimchi.
4. I can, however, see one very clear reason for tactical pistol reloads: LEO/police officers, who might reasonably expect to engage in gunfights with criminals, and be armed only with their duty sidearm.
The problem is, for a civilian, drop-free mags are kind of a pain when reloading at the range because they risk damage to the most sensitive component of the firearm -the magazine, with its relatively delicate feed lips, follower, spring, etc. Civilians have to buy new ones from their own pocket and can’t necessarily put another hundred rounds through those mags that just hit the dirt, to make sure their tumble to earth didn’t impede reliability.
Easily pressed mag releases also seem great in the context of the tactical reload at the range, but aren’t so great for the civilian carrier, who depends on his mag to actually be in the gun when he needs it. They have an annoying habit of getting pressed, and then the magazine either departs the gun and might get lost completely, or is at least dislodged, rendering the gun potentially inoperable at a critical moment.
What say you? Do you practice tactical reloads? Think they’re a bit overrated?