OP, don't get too hung up on the tool...look at the task, and pick the best tool for you to perform that task. I've written government specifications for handguns and conducted T&E for same. As far as detractors on the 2022 and 250 go - based solely on the idea that some government agency didn't like that particular firearm - well, government firearms purchasing nowdays is primarilly politics and low bid, with politics coming first. The ATF, for instance, knows far more about smuggling illegal guns in to foreign countries that it will ever know about purchasing firearms. And the TSA? You want to base your firearms decisions on an agency that thinks it is o.k. to strip search an elderly lady and remove her adult diapers...and all that is o.k with them? Well, if so, suit yourself.
Would I buy a 2022? No, but that's just me. France bought something like 250K of them in the largest ever purchase of handguns since WWII and are seemingly perfectly happy. Would I buy a 250? Yes, but again, that's just me.
Some guys will also tell you not to buy a M9 because they saw Jet Li take one apart in a movie while it was in the other guy's hand. Be careful of the 'I once read', 'my friend had...', or 'I once saw' crowd, and either do the testing yourself or discuss such matters with those who have.
I've dealt with the 250 since it was a prototype, and will be the first to admit is no classic-frame SIG, but then again it is unlike any other handgun out there, too. No, I don't work for them or have any interest in the company. Yes, I am a factory trained armorer.
It's a decent gun for the money.
http://gunnuts.net/2011/07/06/sig-sauer-p250-5000-rounds-later/ And that guy shoots more in a week than most do in a year.
But, it's no competition gun, either.
Will it do what you want it to do? Only
you can answer that. It might be the gun for you, and if so the 2-sum is a heck of a deal.