Look, it's perfectly fine to say about a particular gun, "I don't need a better trigger; I don't need a bolt-lock safety; I don't need CRF; I don't need sub-MOA." You probably don't, and maybe you even prefer PF to CRF.
However, the gun in question here doesn't exist in a vacuum. It has an MSRP of $1080 when you can buy a perfectly functional, light weight centerfire hunting rifle for 300 bucks, brand new, from any of 3 other American companies (one of which is now part of Remington, I guess). If someone's spec is something that "Goes bang when I pull the trigger, places the bullets where ever I need them, if I do my job, and drops what ever I hit. Now what else do I need?", the 7's price is a bit high.
It's entirely legitimate to point out that, for a grand, it lacks a feature that is standard on every other rifle, even for a fraction of the price.
You decide if you care.
Frankly, I wouldn't buy one for the money they are now asking. That doesn't mean it won't kill a deer. It doesn't even mean I don't like the way it handles and shoots. In fact, I do. I also have a soft spot for the 870, but I'll tell you what isn't perfect about it.
The OP wrote, "Tell me about..." Well, that's "about." And the fact is, if FN makes the new M70 like they claim they will, the gun above will be a much better value than the M7 for about the same money.
A few years ago, the M7 was priced much more reasonably. It's also not my fault if Remington jacks up their prices when there's some good competition out there.