Kymasabe
Member
I'm curious. I keep running into the occasional reference to I.O. AK's and it seems like people have a generally poor opinion of them
I've had over a dozen AK's: too many WASR's, 4 or 5 Saiga's that I've converted, someone's other convertion (think it was a Hesse), had a beautiful Armory USA Bulgarian AK (was the best one) and now have an I.O. AK that is a close second to my Bulgarian AK. My I.O. operates flawlessly, fit and finish look better than the Saiga's I've had, and I like the idea of having a US made receiver and barrel. I've got no complaints with the thing (other than it NOT having a scope mount rail on the side), and don't know if I got lucky with a good one and they usually have problems or what?
Based on my experience with my I.O. AK, I'd recommend one.
So, what am I missing? Other's having problems with them? Tell me about yours.
I've had over a dozen AK's: too many WASR's, 4 or 5 Saiga's that I've converted, someone's other convertion (think it was a Hesse), had a beautiful Armory USA Bulgarian AK (was the best one) and now have an I.O. AK that is a close second to my Bulgarian AK. My I.O. operates flawlessly, fit and finish look better than the Saiga's I've had, and I like the idea of having a US made receiver and barrel. I've got no complaints with the thing (other than it NOT having a scope mount rail on the side), and don't know if I got lucky with a good one and they usually have problems or what?
Based on my experience with my I.O. AK, I'd recommend one.
So, what am I missing? Other's having problems with them? Tell me about yours.