Test 1 of the Federal 124gr +P EFMJ

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 8, 2004
Messages
1,265
Location
Wabash IN
Test 1 of the Federal Expanding Full Metal Jacket 124 grain +P 9mm

For those not familiar with the Federal Expanding Full Metal Jacket (EFMJ), it is what its name implies: a full metal jacketed round which expands. It does this via a rubber plug in the nose. Upon impact the rubber (actually silicone) presses against prestressed scored lines in the jacket, causing deformation and expansion. This renders the bullet immune to weaknesses from which a traditional hollow point bullet suffers, namely the ability to be clogged by cloth.

I am aware of two weights in 9mm caliber as of this point in time, 105 grain and 124 grain. I have heard rumors of a 115 grain version but have not seen it. The 105 grain is readily available to the public. I had been told that the 124 grain is primarily law enforcement. Gary at Federal Cartridge confirmed this. He did add however that they do not restrict sales to non- law enforcement as do some other companies and that it can be ordered through a law enforcement supply shop should one not wish to be “stuck with†the 105 grain option.

One of the cartridge’s claims to fame is the ability to penetrate barriers. Today I set out to test this.

The firearm used was my pet pistol, a 1991 vintage Taurus PT92. This is a pre-decock version and, as such, I often carry it in single action with the safety engaged, i.e., “cocked’n’lockedâ€. I save the double action trigger for more politically correct functions: Whenever I’m in town.

f468873a.jpg

The first item tested was accuracy. I need to know that my pistol will shoot a particular round before I trust my life to it. I therefore set a target at a paced seven yards.

I feel seven yards is more than adequate. I debated on using an actual tape measure; I decided, however, to pace it off as real world encounters are rarely measured. I stuck to my semi-controlled stance for the duration of this test.

f4688725.jpg

This is what the rounds did in my hands, from my pistol. They are not as accurate as some other rounds I’ve fired. However, I believe they are plenty accurate for serious work and I am therefore carrying them at the moment.

Five shots were fired for accuracy from a Weaver stance. I’ll let the pictures speak for themselves.

f468871f.jpg

Here is a closer view. All shots fired stayed on the playing card with no real flyer.

Next came the penetration tests. I had two barriers with me today: a piece of inch thick hardwood and two sheets of drywall. The sheets of drywall together equaled ½".

f4688729.jpg

Here is the entrance hole on the oak.

I liked that entrance hole. I had never shot wood before that showed a circle as concentric as this.

f4688721.jpg

This is the exit hole. Notice how much larger it is than the entrance. This seems to indicate that the bullet was already beginning to deform.

Deformation was suspected in wood, a trait which I’ve not seen shared by the traditional hollow point as it needs external hydrodynamic pressure to influence expansion/deformation. I decided to forego the test with the drywall as it would have been worse than redundant to the wood.

f468872b.jpg

These are the wetpack entrance holes. The barely visible hole on the left was shot while the wetpack was naked. The one on the right shows the beginnings of expansion after the bullet passed through the wood.

Before I show the exit holes I would like to apologize as I could not manage to show the insides. Suffice to say both are perfectly conical showing uniform expansion. I particularly admire the fact that this ammunition can do this well after passing through a not informidable barrier.

f468872e.jpg

The exit hole on the left was what the barrier penetrator made. The one on the right was bare wetpack.

In a day or two I will head out to the range again with a thicker wetpack. This one proved too thin though it did show how readily these rounds will expand. The new wetpack is soaking as I type this. I would also like to take a frontal shot on a racoon but I do not know if I will be given the chance.

Thus far I am favorably impressed with this ammunition. The recoil, while a bit sharp, is very quick. This to me is more important to bringing my pistol to bear again after recoil than a light, long “shove†type recoil.

I do not feel handicapped in the least by carrying Federal’s Expanding Full Metal Jacket over traditional hollow point ammunition.

Joshua M. Smith

Special thanks to Mr. Stephen A. Camp, Federal Cartridge Company and their excellent customer service, and to the members of Handguns and Ammunition who made me curious enough to start testing ammo a bit more seriously.

http://www.hipowersandhandguns.com
http://www.federalcartridge.com

(removed copywrite as per request)
 
Last edited:
Joshua, just a warning - anything you post on THR is in the public domain. You can't copyright it or reserve rights to it. If you want to do that, you'd have to post it on your own Web site, where you own all rights, and then link to it from here - that way, your copyright would remain intact. By "publishing" your information on a public forum like this, you've lost copyright protection.

Just FYI...
 
Preacherman,

Thank you. I actually have it on my own website- another board actually- and posted it here, just a copy'n'paste.

Are you asking me to remove the copywrite claim as well? I will edit it out if needed.

Thank you,

Josh <><
 
Is there some way that you could test this ammo on a car windshield, side windows and doors? I would very interested in the results.
 
Seven High,

I've actually been trying to find a way to do that.

The local auto boneyard and I used to be on fairly good terms. No longer; the guy who runs the place is a druggy. I found out and he knows that I know.

If and when I can get more of these rounds I will be finding a way however. I might be able to get someone to donate an old derby car.

Being in auto technology I will tell you that it will pass easily through the door of almost any car made today and have plenty of punch left over. I would test the angle of deflection of a windshield by placing an IPSC target or similar in the driver's seat. That, I suppose, would be my biggest concern: deflection.

I'll see what I can come up with; no promises and likely not in the near future.

Josh <><
 
Josh - good work! :) All ammo testing is useful to see.

I found when testing ammo thru R9 that even with std pressure ammo, I needed my wetpack to be way thicker than expected! Firing from about 6 feet distance as I did, required a pack of total thickness in region of 18" or more. It was ''dismantled'' after use to retrieve the bullets.
 
FWIW, and not 9mm related, I put 4 rounds (all I had with me) of 45 ACP EFMJ through a deer carcass last Fall. All expanded fine. Small sample for sure, but in real meat not gelatin. This year I'll do more and post.
FWIW
YMMV
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top