• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Testing the Glock 43 pocket pistol

C-grunt

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
5,195
Location
Phoenix Az
I recently bought a Glock 43 to replace my S&W 442 for pocket carry. It is slightly more difficult to pocket carry, mostly due to shape. But it is FAR easier to shoot well. I also mostly wear shorts and pants with pockets easily large enough to fit the Glock.

I have about 300 rounds through the Glock 43 now and it's been 100 percent reliable. Not surprised there. Today I wanted to try some slow fire accuracy to test it against my duty gun Glock 17. Not necessarily a fair comparison as the 17 has a red dot and a full size gun. I was just more curious.

Here are 5 round groups at 15 yards.

Glock 17. I of course had to pull one shot...

20230814_112851 by chase, on Flickr



Glock 43. I noted my shots are grouping slightly left. At this time I cant tell if it's me having a harder time with the tiny gun or if it's the crappy stock Glock sights. Probably a mixture of both.

20230814_112859 by chase, on Flickr

20230814_114637 by chase, on Flickr

Brought along the Ruger Mk4 to get some good practice to focus on trigger control. Ive heard a lot of people talk bad about the Remington Thunderbolt II ammo. But it's been running great in all of my 22s.

20230814_114448 by chase, on Flickr
 
I bought a Glock 43 a few years ago. It’s a compact little gun for sure, it just didn’t fit me very well so shooting it wasn’t comfy. I tried a flat trigger, changed my grip a bit, etc., but nothing seemed to help me. I certainly didn’t shoot it as well as you do, at 15 yds that isn’t bad at all with that little 9mm. Nice job! :thumbup:

The Glock 48 fits my hands a lot better, so I ccw my 43X instead. The 43 is more packable than the 43X/48 though, I do wish it agreed with me better.

That Glock 17 group is doggone nice as well. Like your target there, I usually toss a round or two as well no matter how hard I try 😞.

Stay safe.
 
I find that I shoot my G43 better than I shoot my G26. Part of that is I can actually get my pinky on the G43 grip where it hangs below the G26 grip. While I do like my G43, I prefer my Sig P938 as far as conceal carry goes. The P938 is smaller and lighter.
 
I bought a Glock 43 a few years ago. It’s a compact little gun for sure, it just didn’t fit me very well so shooting it wasn’t comfy. I tried a flat trigger, changed my grip a bit, etc., but nothing seemed to help me. I certainly didn’t shoot it as well as you do, at 15 yds that isn’t bad at all with that little 9mm. Nice job! :thumbup:

The Glock 48 fits my hands a lot better, so I ccw my 43X instead. The 43 is more packable than the 43X/48 though, I do wish it agreed with me better.

That Glock 17 group is doggone nice as well. Like your target there, I usually toss a round or two as well no matter how hard I try 😞.

Stay safe.
Ditto. I should have never traded off my Glock P80 (Gen 2 17 remaster)... I had a threaded barrel on it and also put a couple QoL improvements on it and it shot wonderfully! Oh well I'm m fully invested in my 45 1911 so....
 
"Glock 43. I noted my shots are grouping slightly left. At this time I cant tell if it's me having a harder time with the tiny gun or if it's the crappy stock Glock sights. Probably a mixture of both."

I find myself shooting slightly left with my G42 (similar size) if I'm not intentional on grip squeeze and trigger squeeze. I think I'm "milking" it to the left some. Both the G43/G42 are great guns.
 
When I was issued a G17gen4, I also had both the G43 and an S&W 642 as backup guns.
I agree, the 642/442 carries just a bit better than the G43.
My G43 was typically carried in a body armor holster or, if the 642 was carried, in an ankle holster.
I had body armor and ankle holsters for either, however, just in case I wanted to switch things up (but not usually).
 
No love for the sig 365? Slightly smaller than a 43 and higher capacity. I have both but carry the sig more because of the capacity.
I agree with Al. Still have a 42, for being just a little smaller/lighter, but much prefer the 365 to the 43. Better trigger, more rounds, slightly smaller (than the 43), milder recoil, and it just flat works.
A buddy spent several months, trying higher capacity aftermarket mags in his 43, before giving up and accepting the SIG as a better proposition.
Yeah, much as I love Centennials, the little autos are simply easier to shoot, and pack.
Moon
 
No love for the sig 365? Slightly smaller than a 43 and higher capacity. I have both but carry the sig more because of the capacity.

The P365 is a great gun. But the grip is to small for my hands. I had a P365XL and my trigger finger jams into my support hand when shooting.
 
I tried both the SIG P365 and Glock 43 when they first came out and didn't really care that much for the smaller, abbreviated grip on both guns. So I waited and when the new "X" versions were introduced I felt that they were a great deal better in terms of how they gave me a much more comfortable grip on the guns.

Liked the P365 grip slightly more than the Glocks but all them were perfectly designed for my smaller size hand
so I got all three (P365, G43X, and G48), along with a S&W Shield Plus (another too good of a grip to pass up on)!
mRdSKTS.jpg

L4ivIP5.jpg

4cgHhyI.jpg

6vXobwE.jpg
 
Back
Top