The 380s

Status
Not open for further replies.

wendelb

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
32
Location
Phoenix, AZ
I asked owners on the forum for opinions on 4 or 5 pocket 380s, which ones they preferred, reliability, comfort, recoil, pricing, etc. I was in the market for two, and wanted some feedback, beyond range reports.

I would have really liked to own a Sig P-238, which I believe was crowned the king, but for the price, it can be beat.

The P3AT/LCP seemed to be the winner of reliability, low weight, cheap, but bad recoil.

As I explained in the other thread, Kahr has scarred me for life, so even if it's the only manufacturer to make a laser gun, I won't buy them.

The BG380 was another high scorer, fairly priced, low weight, decent recoil. It was one of the two I purchased.

The one that got almost all bad reviews, for reliability, accuracy, and recoil, was the diamondback. However, I clung to Heeler's advice, and bought one anyways, the newest line, with all of the changes made.

Range day:

As was explained, I've shot a keltec, and own a Micro Deagle. Keltec was a little snappy, not enjoyable, but doable, and the MDE is a monster of poor design. It's one of the heaviest pocket 380s, and is the worst at recoil.

To start, both the BG380 and DB380 are remarkably accurate in my opinion. And for both, the recoil was VERY mild- to the point I thought my first round was a squib from lack of recoil. I wasn't expecting pain, but I thought that my hand would start to feel it after 50 rds. Both guns run beautifully. Two people that I went shooting with, who own keltecs, decided to buy DB380s because of it.

Between the two, the diamondback won, which I was surprised with. Reliability, comfort, and recoil were all ties for the most part. However, the DB has white dot sights, the BG just has black. I fixed that with a kit, but haven't shot it since. Also, the DB has a very glock-like trigger pull. It's a virtually a mini glock, inside and out. Minor differences. The BG, my biggest complaint is that it has a very stiff and long pull. I've shot enough revolvers that I could run it through just fine, but my wife couldn't get a handle on it. She pulled 90% of her shots on it, and she carries a Glock-30, so she's not a timid woman. I'm considering taking a few coils off the BG's mainspring to ease the trigger up some. I haven't taken a look at what it's insides are like, but it could do with a pound or two less.

I will give credit where credit is due. I have not shot a stock DB380. Below is a picture of how I brought mine to the range, never before firing it. I bought it new, with a crimson trace laser installed, I used half of a hogue jr slip, to add girth to the palm swell, and give ring finger support on the frame. And lastly, I found some LCP finger rest/grip extensions that fit the mags. Needed a mm shaved off the top so the mag would seat, but functioned fine. However, that allows all four fingers something to hold onto, which could make a world of difference in felt recoil, not having your pinky tucked under, as well as another 2-3 oz of laser under the barrel. Regardless, put 100 rds in each, BVAC reloads, and not a hiccup yet.

So I would suggest both guns, but would give sway to the diamondback more. Definitely take Heelers advice, and go with the new line. Serial starting in ZD. I got a ZC, the only difference between the two being the extractor, which diamondback (awesome customer support) mailed me for free, and I changed out myself- identical to a glock slide disassembly. Like I said, I had never shot a DB380 before, or one stock. And maybe the ZA/ZB line had some flaws, but if so, diamondback got their act together, because that is one hell of a gun.

DB380.JPG
 
Great review on those guns. I just posted a range report on my new BG 380 and saw your post shortly after. I agree completely with your comments on both the BG 380 and P3AT, both of which I own.

I am now in love with the BG 380 and it's going to be my main pocket carry gun. However, I am very curious about the DB as, I have to admit, I wasn't aware of it when I bought the BG 380. If you don't mind me asking, how much did you pay for it?

Thanks.
 
Don't forget Bersa Thunder 380! Bersa makes a jolly good 380. By all accounts, it is better to shoot than a Walther PPK/S. (lighter recoil, despite being a lighter gun)

My old Model 83 (Pre-Thunder) is very accurate and reliable. I bought it off a buddy for $125. I just spent another $25 on a second magazine for it. (they are hard to find now, since they aren't the same as the Thunder 380 mags.)

If you're only looking at the micro 380s, Bersa makes CC Thunder 380, which is all set up for carry. They're under $300 new.
 
I just bought my middle kid a Bersa Thunder CC 380 for Christmas. Sweet little gun. Just a bit too large for me to pocket carry, though, which is why I stick to the BG 380 or Kel Tec P3at. If I have pants loose enough to fit a bigger gun in the front pocket, I carry the 642 J Frame revolver.
 
The DB380 ran me $320+$150 for the CTC installed. You can get the older DB380s, new, for around $280, but I wanted one post-flaws.
 
The bersa's are nice, but they're big. Easily concealable yes, but not that much smaller than a para slim hawg. I was going for true pocket gun.
 
I got the Taurus 380. I can get my finger on the trigger as with any other larger gun. Otherwise I would have ended up with either the Ruger or the P3AT. Those, my trigger finger on the trigger actually depresses the trigger, and no I don't have fat fingers, just large hands. Anyway, I've shot several hundred factory and reloaded rounds without any issues. I carry it everywhere most all the time either in my pocket in cargo shorts or in the accompanying "cell phone case" that comes with the gun with jeans. I've never noticed any undesirable recoil with it.
 
Twice in the last 6 weeks Academy has run the Diamondback on sale for $229. I started to buy one but read too many bad reviews.
I'm pretty happy with my LCP.
 
I've got an LCP. It's reliable - recoil doesn't bother me really but I hate the trigger on it. I also really don't like heaving to let my pinky hang off of it. With the Pearce grip extension I can get all my fingers on the grip but it's still a tight fit.

I'm gonna hang onto it, but I think I may try out some other guns. The Bersa looks like a possibility - I like the slightly larger size of it - I really would like a polymer gun for carry though just for weight reasons.
 
I'm gonna hang onto it, but I think I may try out some other guns. The Bersa looks like a possibility - I like the slightly larger size of it - I really would like a polymer gun for carry though just for weight reasons.

Eh, if you're going to get into the realm of the larger 380's, and want polymer, you should look at the Walther PK380. Very light, 8rd mags, decent trigger and sights, very low recoil. I have a PK380 and a Bersa and prefer the PK380.
 
Well what Joker19 just stated,twice in fact, is unfortunately what a great many owners came away with in the early days of LCP's,P3AT's,Diamondbacks,the Sig P238,etc.
It's tough being the beta tester for a handgun maker but if they are going to stay in business they will take the complaints from owners that piss and moan on these types of forums as well as what they have to deal with on their warranty repairs and see just what they must do to get it right.
I have read Sig has upgraded their recoil mechanism to get things right.
Ruger has issued recalls and made other improvements to get it right.
Kel-Tec has done pretty much the same.
Heres my experience with the Diamondback....Bought one over a year ago and after a couple of hundred rounds I had to send it back to Diamondback because the magazine release spring broke,which on the early production models such as mine was common.
I put close to 1000 round through it and then a few weeks ago the trigger bar mechanism broke.
Which was another common problem with early production DB's.
Diamondback prepaid the shipping back to the factory and much to my surprise they sent me a brand spanking new Diamondback for free.
No hassles or strings attached.
Mine is one of the new ZD serial numbers with upgraded components and so far I have put 240 rounds through it with zero issues.
It just flat feeds,fires,and spits them out.
A very comfortable little pistol to shoot.
Accurate too.
As I type this it is in my right cargo pocket residing inside a RKBA pocket holster.
Someone mentioned Academy Sports has had these on sale lately for $229.00 which is true but what you are buying is the now discontinued MS model which features the cheaper and less user friendly sights that are the non adjustable machined sights,hence the designation "MS".
Anyway,just remember that on all of these handguns they come with decent warranty's and although it's an undesirable PIA to send back a gun to the factory more times than not they will get it right.
Anyway I was impressed as hell with the customer service of Diamondback Firearms.
 
Well I've got to say, I'm so happy I took up your advice. I prefer strikerfired vs hammer... Glocks aren't my favorite gun, but it's fairly undebatable they are the most reliable. I actually hated them, till I had to run a 2,000 rd/ 1 week test with one. After that, it just seemed to fit my hand. But I digress.

The Diamondback really impressed me. The laser is kind of "cool". I added it mainly for the few oz of weight, but agree that most 380 shootings are one handed, and not using a preferred shooting platform or sight alignment. So a laser serves it's purpose of confirming where you're aiming. On ARs and shotguns, IMO, they're purely for aesthetics. And for handguns, most people aim with the laser, and not their sights, and concentrate on the laser, therefore not concentrating on their trigger pull. Without practice, give a person a gun with a laser, and they will suck at shooting. It's like they lose all the basic fundamentals. Personally, I think training on index shooting, especially from your hip, at close ranges, is well advised... more or less "cowboy" shooting, index, clear the holster, rock the barrel up, and squeeze, with the gun at your waist. You can get very accurate at index aiming.
 
I purchased a BG a few weeks ago fully expecting to dislike it as much as the LCP. Was I ever surprised! This gun is really fun to shoot, recoil isn't obnoxious and accuracy is quite good for a gun it's size. This gun is such a pleasure to shoot I invested in a set of dies to load .380 (never thought I'd being loading .380 in my lifetime)
 
I purchased a BG a few weeks ago fully expecting to dislike it as much as the LCP. Was I ever surprised! This gun is really fun to shoot, recoil isn't obnoxious and accuracy is quite good for a gun it's size. This gun is such a pleasure to shoot I invested in a set of dies to load .380 (never thought I'd being loading .380 in my lifetime)
Agree on the BG. Great little pocket gun and it has replaced my beloved KTP3at.
 
I've owned or shot all of them, including 2 P-3ATs that were both complete junk, and nothing comes close to the Ruger LCP.
 
Diamondback feedback

I have fired or owned every .380 thus far mentioned with the exception of the new .380 offerings from Sig and Taurus, I have owned or fired a bunch more not mentioned in this thread and BY FAR the VERY WORST of them was the Diamondback, worst P.O.S. I have ever owned. I bought mine new in November of 2009, it took 2 trips to the factory, 10 months and at least a dozen phone calls to get it replaced.
I understand new production runs often have issues that eventually get worked out, I might have been willing to be more forgiving if the customer service was not the worst I have ever had. Peter is the gunsmith I talked to the first few times at Diamondback, after the first time I sent it in and it came back with the same issues, along with some new ones, I talked to a guy that claimed to be the owner and president of the company, the guy flat out berated me, insisting they fixed my gun before they sent it back to me, his hostile attitude and harsh words had me praying to God that if he intended to strike anyone with lightning that day, that this was surely as a good a candidate as any.

The gun went back a second time, came back with the same problems, more phone calls were made, eventually it was agreed I would be sent a new gun, I of course sold it at a loss as soon as it arrived without ever taking it out of the box.

I must give credit where credit is due, the receptionist at Diamondback was named Rose, she was always very polite, always transferred my calls quickly and always made sure my calls and messages were returned, if only she had some decision making authority in regards to how the company is run, things may have gone differently.

Diamondback is run by a couple former Kel-Tec employees that thought they could build a better mouse trap, in fact, thier facility is just down the road from Kel-Tec, having finally learned my lesson, I went back to the P3AT, its worth noting that the Diamondback mags DO function in the P3AT.
 
freerange

Thanks for your imput.

As a fellow p3at owner ... don't you think that the trigger guard would have benefited if it had been designed LONGER?

I mean the area where the trigger is located.
 
Peter was the gunsmith I dealt with. I can't say how well he is at fixing things, because I didn't send mine in. He did however respond to my first email within a 24 hours, and I got the parts within 3 days of sending my reply (with my address).

I know some people hated the gun when it first came out, and I wouldn't own one with serial ZA or ZB. A LOT of parts changed from the ZB to the ZC. The inside looks completely different. And I'm an armorer for a few, so I'm not saying it was black, now it's silver, it's a whole different engine.

So sure, the company had some kinks to work out starting up. But, at least they worked them out. The DB380 I own, isn't even in the same league as the P3at. There's no comparison to how much the DB out performs. Keltec may have blown it out of the water 2 years ago, but it's not the case now. I can however empathize. I will never own a Kahr again, because of my accounts on the abundance flaws in a PM9 I bought, and the terrible smithing. Kahr has a great reputation, and people love them, but I'll never own one again, because it left a bad taste in my mouth. So you had a bad experience with the DB, and even if they've fixed it, you could still have reservations in trusting it. I probably would too. Only difference was that the PM9 isn't a new gun, I just got a bad batch.

And yes, DB and P3at mags are interchangeable, same size, length, catch. Only difference is the baseplate.
 
Gonzo,
I agree with you regarding the Kel-Tec trigger guard, but I think they are very well suited to thier intended purpose. I am also a fan of the Bersa .380, my dad gave my sister one as a gift when she graduated with her degree, she cant seem to miss with it, I like shooting it just as much as she does, I have never seen it fail or heard her say that it has, and I dont think it ever gets cleaned except when dad does it for her.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top