Two dissenting opinions. Does that mean that they cannot even agree on why they disagree?
Tom Goldstein is such a funny guy...
10:12 Tom Goldstein - The Morgan Stanley opinion holds that FERC was required to apply the Mobile Sierra presumption. There, everyone knows what they came here to find out.
Two dissenting opinions. Does that mean that they cannot even agree on why they disagree?
Yes, that about sums it up.
Not really. Despite attempts to appear non-political, the SC since at least FDR has been very political, especially on the left side of issues.That large a dissent (4) is striking. Reading the two dissenting opinions will be interesting.
Boy is that an understatement!Breyer, Souter, Stevens and Ginsburg incapable of reading plain English
That is worrisome.Justice Antonin Scalia’s opinion for the majority stressed that the Court was not casting doubt on long-standing bans on gun possession by felons or the mentally retarded, or laws barring guns from schools or government buildings, or laws putting conditions on gun sales.