jjduller1946
Member
I was amazed at the unified response, is the .308 just that much better? Personally I feel the 06 is a fine time-proven cartridge, and is something I can setup for varmints, deer, bear, and even elk/moose with the proper bullet weights and powder.
Dust 101,
I find these discussions full of old war stories (better than old wives tales I guess) but with tidbits of commons sense sprinkled in.
The 30-06 generates 100 fps more muzzle velocity with exactly the same 165 grain bullet compared with 308. So the 30-06 generates a slightly flater tragector and a little more fp lbs of energy. See the pic here of the two rounds showing Muzzle Velocity.
If you check the choices of ammo in the Federal Balistics tool http://www.federalpremium.com/default.asp?br=1 you find 20 choices from 125 to 220 gr bullets. The same tool shows 15 308 rounds ranging from 150-180 grain bullets.
Of course the 308 is a little shorter resulting in a shorter through for a bolt action rifle.
Both of these rounds were developed for the US Military. The 308 Nato round has the advantage in machine guns as the shorter round is less likely to jam in your belt-fed machine gun.
I had a 270 in Montana years ago and failed to pack my recently reloaded ammo for the trip. While my buddies were blasting away at elk I was driving down the highway stoppping at homes asking to buy a box of ammo. Of course they had 30-06 and 308 and 30-30. I did not find 270 ammo until I got to Seely Lake. They had one old dog-eared box of 130 gr ammo. I little light for elk but I was glad as hell to be headed back to the Mountain. Sometimes it is a good thing to be shooting a reliable and fairly common round.
You will not be dissappointed in the 30-06!