Here's the link to the nightmare (in PDF):
http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/pub...?File_id=dd2252a0-db96-45cc-96a8-493a2e348c6d
http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/pub...?File_id=dd2252a0-db96-45cc-96a8-493a2e348c6d
No it isn't, because it was faultily applied. The 1st amendment does NOT apply to pornography, hate speech, "fighting words" and the proverbial "yelling fire in a crowded theater."
Actually, the 1st does protect pornography and the reason why it doesnt protect "yelling fire in a crowded theater" is because that infringes on the right to life of others.
Kiln said:The 2,000+ exempt guns are more than likely things that aren't considered assault weapons anyways.
Hopefully this thing goes to the senate and dies there but I've never been happier to have a republican controlled house.
If Feinstein had her way the list would exclusively contain bolt actions and 5 shot revolvers.Most of the exempt guns on that list are bolt-action and pump-action firearms. That's the most ridiculous thing of all.
The 1st doesn't protect pornography. If you think it does then explain how the prisons contain child pronographers.
As to the yelling of fire in the theater, that is from a quote, IIRC, from Justice Learned Hand. The presumption behind the famous quote is not the perpetrator was trying to save lives, but yelling "fire" falsely to illicit fear and confusion and chaos as the attendees all attempt to flee from a false nonexistant danger.
Rights are limited by the existential ends they're intended to protect, not licenses to commit harm on others.
There are two types of pornography that receive no First Amendment protection — obscenity and child pornography. The First Amendment generally protects pornography that does not fall into one of these two categories — at least for adult viewers
The 1st doesn't protect pornography. If you think it does then explain how the prisons contain child pronographers.
danez71 said:Do a simple google search before you spout off false info as if its fact.
The 1st DOES protect pornography.
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/...aphy-obscenity
Quote:
There are two types of pornography that receive no First Amendment protection — obscenity and child pornography. The First Amendment generally protects pornography that does not fall into one of these two categories — at least for adult viewers
The 1st doesn't protect pornography. If you think it does then explain how the prisons contain child pronographers.
Rights are limited by the existential ends they're intended to protect, not licenses to commit harm on others.
Most of the exempt guns on that list are bolt-action and pump-action firearms. That's the most ridiculous thing of all.
mgmorden said:By its specific wording that does ban at least the Glock 17 (semi-auto version of the Glock 18).
Zoogster said:I think it would be ironic if it banned the Ruger mini-14, the semi auto version of the AC556.