The preplanned push for gun control took off today

Status
Not open for further replies.
I ran across a news lead with Pelosi saying it was fruitless to pursue a filibuster since another AWB couldn't get passed, just work on the no fly no buy bills and expanded background checks.

Then again maybe that was a spoof piece from an unreliable source? It made too much sense.

The 16 news anchors parroting the same lines is proof enough the media is just passing along their political talking points. It's much the same as the last federal shutdown, when Park Police posted closing signs in the thousands across the capital on less than 12 hours notice of no bill. They had them printed up weeks before hand ready for a showdown.

Almost nothing in DC happens spur of the moment, it's always part of an larger agenda with numerous pre planned checkpoints to accomplish. Hence the AR15 "mistake" - it really doesn't make a difference as long as they keep pounding the same drum. Their audience always takes what they are spoon fed as credible and don't pay attention to fact checking or 2d day corrections anyway.

For the rest of us - especially mil/LEO - we always expect the first reports to be wrong and to deal with a changing perception of what the situation might be. What the media and crisis panderers tried to present hasn't really proven to be what they initially presented. Which is the norm.

"Let no crisis go to waste." Well they keep crying wolf and eventually the public will ignore them.
 
16 news anchors parroting the same talking points is proof of the consolidation of the local news. Your "local" news is likely written hundreds of miles away.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
 
I ran across a news lead with Pelosi saying it was fruitless to pursue a filibuster since another AWB couldn't get passed, just work on the no fly no buy bills and expanded background checks.

This ABC/Washington Post news poll indicates that the political landscape has changed a lot over the past quarter-century -

AWB_poll_zpsjsdxv9l8.png

The proliferation of "CCW" states and the SCOTUS Heller decision are more examples of the pendulum swinging in favor of the Second Amendment.

The by-the-numbers "recipe" for gun bans used in the past is not so effective anymore.

Instead of banning guns, now the leftists are trying to ban people.

...
 
This ABC/Washington Post news poll indicates that the political landscape has changed a lot over the past quarter-century -

AWB_poll_zpsjsdxv9l8.png

The proliferation of "CCW" states and the SCOTUS Heller decision are more examples of the pendulum swinging in favor of the Second Amendment.

The by-the-numbers "recipe" for gun bans used in the past is not so effective anymore.

Instead of banning guns, now the leftists are trying to ban people.

...
The hilarious thing is that when they lose THIS fight (and probably seats), they'll be just as perplexed as they always are.

"Gee, we advocated anti-sodomy laws and a bill to protect people who throw gays off of buildings, yet we lost the gay vote. I just don't get it..."
 
same old tiresome drama we have seen before

The proponents will use a majority no vote to posture about how the rest of Congress has been bought by the Gun Lobby but they are still pure and righteous.

One (rare honest) gun researcher pointed out that the NRA won most of its legislative battles by raising legitimate objections to badly drawn and poorly thought out proposals.

To antis though (to whom reasonable regulation is the NYC implementaion of the 1911 Sullivan Act, the D.C. and Chicago handgun bans, the Clinton Assault Weapons Ban) their proposals are just common sense.
 
And as of now the four bills that were considered in the Senate didn't pass. It's not expected the House will even take them up. It was a roll call vote, you can see who voted which way, and for the most part just political theatre to register their stand for the electorate where they can see it.

It's all part of the show, folks. Political gun theater for the constituents while the talking heads complain about the "same old gridlock not advancing security to protect the American public." spoken with resigned gravitas as "everybody" knows it would help.

In their protected and secure areas guarded by armed men it does.
 
Uh, no they aren't. Well, at least one of them isn't. Our illustrious Cornyn is the one proposing one of the four bills they took upon themselves to bring to a vote on Monday (Christ, barely a week since the bodies went cold, and months before any kind of rational response is possible). But don't worry, it's "not as bad" as the similar bill Dianne Feinstein has proposed.

Unless this is some sort of elaborate ruse, and Mr. Cornyn explains the gambit in very clear terms that make sense to me, I'll be wasting a lot of time working to get him unseated for the next four years. Having a senior-level congressman has its perks, but he's no different from Feinstein on national security issues at this point (both hawkish to a near-fascist degree in valuing safety/power over freedom)

TCB
Yup,
Coryn was all in favor of adding a new jim crow againt the second ammendment and he turned off his voice mail and hs staff would not answer phones even transfers from the switch board
that I will remember next primary
 
Yup,
Coryn was all in favor of adding a new jim crow againt the second ammendment and he turned off his voice mail and hs staff would not answer phones even transfers from the switch board
that I will remember next primary

Excellent. We have to remember and rid ourselves of these fools.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top