Tika T3 rings and mounts

Status
Not open for further replies.

gamestalker

member
Joined
Sep 10, 2008
Messages
9,827
Location
SW Arizona
My DIL just bought a stainless Tika Light chambered in .270 win..

She bought a Vortex 6.5x20x50 with a 30mm tube for it. Well obviously, the rings it came with it are 1" rings. So my question is what do we need to use.

Here's what we want to do.

She wants to go with either Warne, Burris Signature's, or the original Optiloc rings.

So I found some Warne 30mm rings, but I'm not certain they will mount straight up to the one piece grooved base the Tika came with. They are the Maxima Permanent - Attachable Weaver Style Rings. they appear to be the right application, as Warne also offers the one's for the Picatinny set up, like EGW offers.

The other question is the height.
One of the technicians at Vortex said the high one's are what we need on the Tika with that scope. But for some reason I got two different responses from two different technicians, and they were conflicting, with one recommending medium, the other high. I think the tech that said go with the mediums, may have missed the part about keeping the factory original grooved base, and was thinking we were going to use the EGW Picatinny option. So I wanted to run this by the experts here at THR, as we obviously want the scope as close to the barrel as possible. It's not that I don't trust the folks at Vortex, they're really good people and usually know what they're talking about.

We already ordered the Warne rings (high) from Midway, they'll be here tomorrow morning. But if they aren't the right stuff, it won't be a problem to get another set on the way, Midway is great about taking care of things.

Time is of the essence, as we have to get this rig up and running quickly, deer season is almost here. And there is little more imposing than a 5' 3" fire cracker Daughter In Law, who is about as patient as a rattle snake, and almost as dangerous. And she can shoot, that girl is gifted with a rifle.

GS
 
The Warne high rings will work, just not sure if they will be too high. Even if you need to exchange to mediums, she will probably need an add-on cheek piece to get a good cheek weld.
 
Heres my setup. Its been a few years but they are Burris bases with Leupold 30mm rings I believe....

Also take a look at the DNZ bases. I hightly recommend those. I had a 1" base for that gun as well but I like my Leupold better


20151023_163940_zpstzbzzgne.jpg
 
Another vote for the DNZ:

32550: Tikka T3 High Mount Black
32550s: Tikka T3 High Mount Silver
http://www.opticsplanet.com/dnz-dednutz-tikka-t3-30-millimeter-scope-mount.html

As far as height, DNZ says:

*The extra low mounts fit all 32MM objective scopes and some 40MM objective scopes.

*All low mounts will fit plain bell 40MM objective scopes and some 44MM objective scopes.

*Medium mounts fit all 44MM objective scopes and most 50MM plain bell objective scopes.

*High mounts fit all 50MM objective scopes and most 56MM objective scopes.

*All dimensions from top of receiver or barrel to center of 1" or 30MM bore.

*Extra low mounts are .795 to .875, depends on firearm.
*Low mounts are .920 to 1.000, depends on firearm.
*Medium mounts are 1.045 to 1.125, depends on firearm.
*High mounts are 1.170 to 1.250, depends on firearm.

I have six of them on my personal rifles. It has a number of things going for it – it starts as a solid block, and the first CNC machining pass makes what becomes the ring centers... the rings cannot be misaligned. It also eliminates any possibility of the rings loosening from recoil. It’s hard anodized, requires no lapping, has hex-head screws, and best of all – made in the USA, in North Carolina. I can’t say enough good things about them – they look like they grew out of the top of the gun.

Mark H.
 
Had one set of dnz, good rings, any more though I go with talley one piece, I think I have a low 30mm on my talley but my scope is a bit different(viper pst 2.5-10x32) good luck. My scope has been rock solid no matter how much abuse had been taken.
 
I have DNZ mounts on my T3. Like them a lot. Tight fit for my 40MM scope. I think they are low mount rings.
 
CDB1, she put the Warren Tika rings on it.

They barely hold and aren't a very good option for a heavy scope, moderate recoil, and if sighting in with a lead sled. I marked the rings with a piece of tape so I could see the slightest amount of movement, they moved, and that was torqued down to 25 inch pounds. I ended up having to increase the torque to about as much as could be applied using a driver to stop it from moving, it's probably on the edge of crushing the tube.

But we just don't have enough time to get a better mounting system installed, dial the rifle back in, and then reload again, so this will have to do for the moment. It's grouping very well though, and as long as the rings don't snap from the high torque, she should be good to go for this hunt at least.

GS
 
This is what I did when I had a T3:

Burris steel bases:
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/11...eme-tactical-scope-base-picatinny-style-tikka

Leupold QRW rings:
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/1362102691/leupold-qrw-quick-release-weaver-style-rings

I can't stand vertical split rings and Warne's in particular are not good.

That combo of rings and bases will give you an all steel mount that's very strong that can be removed for cleaning---for less than $100 bones.

It also allows you to set up a second scope just in case the first one gets damaged on a hunt a long way from home. That way all isn't lost should something go wrong with your equipment. Just pop off the broken optic and slap on your already sighted in second scope----should hit close enough that the deer won't care what its been hit with.

PS---looking at the specs of the scope----seems to be an awful lot of scope, in particular if the deer decides to stop 25yds in front of you----she would be much better off with a 2x7 of 3x9 for a general hunting rifle. Being a .270, I'm assuming that's what its intended to be. That big ol scope will also make the rifle very unwieldy.
 
Last edited:
This is what I did when I had a T3:

Burris steel bases:
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/11...eme-tactical-scope-base-picatinny-style-tikka

Leupold QRW rings:
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/1362102691/leupold-qrw-quick-release-weaver-style-rings

I can't stand vertical split rings and Warne's in particular are not good.

That combo of rings and bases will give you an all steel mount that's very strong that can be removed for cleaning---for less than $100 bones.

It also allows you to set up a second scope just in case the first one gets damaged on a hunt a long way from home. That way all isn't lost should something go wrong with your equipment. Just pop off the broken optic and slap on your already sighted in second scope----should hit close enough that the deer won't care what its been hit with.

PS---looking at the specs of the scope----seems to be an awful lot of scope, in particular if the deer decides to stop 25yds in front of you----she would be much better off with a 2x7 of 3x9 for a general hunting rifle. Being a .270, I'm assuming that's what its intended to be. That big ol scope will also make the rifle very unwieldy.
There are many good rings and bases out there and I've mounted most of them. A lot of it is personal preference. You don't like Warne, I do. My favorites on Tikka's are Warne rings and Leupold Tikka base and Std rings. YMMV.
 
I've had Warne Tikka rings on a 595 for a long time with no problems.The last couple I have put receiver length picatinny/weaver rails on. The only time that doesn't work well is with shorter scopes can't keep them low
 
CDB1, she put the Warren Tika rings on it.

They barely hold and aren't a very good option for a heavy scope, moderate recoil, and if sighting in with a lead sled. I marked the rings with a piece of tape so I could see the slightest amount of movement, they moved, and that was torqued down to 25 inch pounds. I ended up having to increase the torque to about as much as could be applied using a driver to stop it from moving, it's probably on the edge of crushing the tube.

But we just don't have enough time to get a better mounting system installed, dial the rifle back in, and then reload again, so this will have to do for the moment. It's grouping very well though, and as long as the rings don't snap from the high torque, she should be good to go for this hunt at least.

GS
There has to be some sort of issue. I've never known Warne rings not to hold. I've never seen a defective set but there has to be at least one out there. Did you torque the screws to 25 inch/pounds?
 
I looked at all the options and gave up. I went with the system I know and have used for years. Leupold bases (dovetail front-windage adj rear) and leupold STD low rings. I'm going to start dialing it in this weekend but I know its solid.

interesting note: Leupold now ships rings and bases with pre applied NYLOCK on screws and states that no other thread locking compound is necessary. (maybe its not new but its new since I last mounted any)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top