Tikka vs Sako question
- Thread starter B.A.M.F
- Start date
- Status
kcmarine
Member
I don't know the exact differences, but I believe that Tikka is the "bargain" version of Sako.
Waywatcher
Member
Well, just comparing my Tikka to my frinds Sako one of the first things I noticed was plastic.
It seemed like everthing on the Sako was metal, but on the Tikka the floorplate/triggerguard and magazine was made of molded plastic.
It seemed like everthing on the Sako was metal, but on the Tikka the floorplate/triggerguard and magazine was made of molded plastic.
bhk
Member
One of the nice things about the Sako is that there are several actions sizes (four, I think). With the Tika, there is only one. My Sako .223 has a beautiful small action just perfect for it's caliber. As the above poster said, it is all metal and wood, no plastic. Also, the metal is all steel - no aluminum like Remington, Ruger, etc. use on their trigger guards and floor plates.
Fumbler
Member
Well...both Sakos and Tikkas have only one extractor.
Sakos have three lug bolts resulting in a more acute bolt lift compared to the 2 lug Tikkas.
The bolt lift on a T3 is still less, and much smoother, than other moderately priced guns like the Rem 700.
Tikkas may have only one action length, but the bolt travel is limited by the bolt stops. So, with shorter calibers you have equally short bolt throws. You don't get a shorter overall action, but who cares about half an inch of unused reciever?
Like others said, the biggest difference is materials. Fit and finish on a Tikka is not bad at all, but it will be better on a Sako.
It's like cars. You can get a Suburban that will tow a certain sized trailer or you can spend more money on a Yukon Denali and tow the exact same trailer in luxury.
solvability
Member
I think Tikka uses a polymer sleeve in the action that the bolt rides in - not a criticism. The Tikka shoots as well as the Sako in the same caliber in my limited experience. Good rifles.
atblis
Member
Well
There isn't a 1000 dollar difference. Tikkas are what, $500ish (more for varmint, stainless etc.). Sakos are what, $1000?
If you're feeling value conscious, you might want to check out CZ's line of rifles. Very very classy.
Tikka is Sako (both owned by Beretta). It's their value line if you will. It appears you already knew that.
The barrels maybe the same (believeable) and perhaps the extractors, but everything else is different.
Accuracy is really good in either gun
Sako's have nicer stocks.
I would call the triggers equal (both superb).
Basically Sakos are prettier and I surmise will hold up better in the long run.
Things about the Tikka (I have a pre T3).
The stock is pretty cheesy. It is a hollow plastic job. However, it is light, and strong enough. It is ergonomic and comfortable to shoot. Sakos have similarly dimensioned stocks, but they are a much higher grade plastic and definitely more solidly made. Both have palmswell which I love.
As said before, more plastic on the Tikka. It is functionally about all you could want, but I'd bet the Sako will last longer.
The integral scope mounts are different. I kinda prefer the Tikka mounts anyways. Both work.
If you want a great shooting gun with a superb trigger. Either
You want something pretty. Sako
You have enough money that and extra $500 won't be missed. Sako
You just want something to shoot. Tikka
If you don't like plastic. Sako
For the price of a Sako, you could buy a Remington, have a Krieger barrel put on it, and put a Jewel trigger in it.
$400 for Rifle
$500 for barrel
$200 for trigger
But you still wouldn't have a Sako.
There isn't a 1000 dollar difference. Tikkas are what, $500ish (more for varmint, stainless etc.). Sakos are what, $1000?
If you're feeling value conscious, you might want to check out CZ's line of rifles. Very very classy.
Tikka is Sako (both owned by Beretta). It's their value line if you will. It appears you already knew that.
The barrels maybe the same (believeable) and perhaps the extractors, but everything else is different.
Accuracy is really good in either gun
Sako's have nicer stocks.
I would call the triggers equal (both superb).
Basically Sakos are prettier and I surmise will hold up better in the long run.
Things about the Tikka (I have a pre T3).
The stock is pretty cheesy. It is a hollow plastic job. However, it is light, and strong enough. It is ergonomic and comfortable to shoot. Sakos have similarly dimensioned stocks, but they are a much higher grade plastic and definitely more solidly made. Both have palmswell which I love.
As said before, more plastic on the Tikka. It is functionally about all you could want, but I'd bet the Sako will last longer.
The integral scope mounts are different. I kinda prefer the Tikka mounts anyways. Both work.
If you want a great shooting gun with a superb trigger. Either
You want something pretty. Sako
You have enough money that and extra $500 won't be missed. Sako
You just want something to shoot. Tikka
If you don't like plastic. Sako
For the price of a Sako, you could buy a Remington, have a Krieger barrel put on it, and put a Jewel trigger in it.
$400 for Rifle
$500 for barrel
$200 for trigger
But you still wouldn't have a Sako.
BigdaddyG
Member
My Tikka T-3 varmit shoots 1/2" for 5 at 100 yards. Has a great trigger. I like it very much and the price was really good a year or so ago.
Hokkmike
Member
I have shot SAKO's most of my life. SAKO is to Tikka what Lexus is to Toyota, or Accura to Honda.
First, nobody should ever have to pay full retail for a gun. List prices are a starting point. The actual difference between the two is much less that $1,000.
The BEST way to discern the difference is to go to the SAKO website and read the detailed features of both offerings. There is also a web site called "The SAKO collecters" that has a lot of information.
Personally, if I want the "real deal" it is worth it to me to save, wait, and be happy. I'd rather have fewer and better than more and cheaper. But, that is just me.
First, nobody should ever have to pay full retail for a gun. List prices are a starting point. The actual difference between the two is much less that $1,000.
The BEST way to discern the difference is to go to the SAKO website and read the detailed features of both offerings. There is also a web site called "The SAKO collecters" that has a lot of information.
Personally, if I want the "real deal" it is worth it to me to save, wait, and be happy. I'd rather have fewer and better than more and cheaper. But, that is just me.
bigcim
Member
I think the bolt on the sako has a controlled round feed
a claw on the bolt the holds the brass similar to a Mauser
a claw on the bolt the holds the brass similar to a Mauser
Eightball
Member
Sako 85--controlled round feed, 3 locking lugs, 60 degree bolt throw, fully-floated barrel, must shoot 5-shot 1" group before it hits the market. Has a "scaled" action (differing sizes, not just "long" and "short")
Tikka T3---Push feed, 2 lugs, majority floated barrel (depends on which model), must shoot 3-shot 1" group before leaving the factory.
Tikka T3---Push feed, 2 lugs, majority floated barrel (depends on which model), must shoot 3-shot 1" group before leaving the factory.
- Status