I thought that you guys were trying to derail the Heller case out of spite or political motivations. I was upset about this and joined GOA whose rhetoric was less compromising.
Now I see how narrow it was, and that one of the assents wasn't even on the court when Heller was coming up, I can see why you all did what you did. You were trying to save all our butts from a 4-5 collective rights loss. I now hear from Gurathat he considered you guys invaluable in the runup to the SCOTUS after the composition of the court changed.
I also see what you're doing in San Francisco and Chicago, trying to get those bans overturned. Your motivations are pretty good.
Here's my $35. Count me in. Go get 'em.
Now I see how narrow it was, and that one of the assents wasn't even on the court when Heller was coming up, I can see why you all did what you did. You were trying to save all our butts from a 4-5 collective rights loss. I now hear from Gurathat he considered you guys invaluable in the runup to the SCOTUS after the composition of the court changed.
I also see what you're doing in San Francisco and Chicago, trying to get those bans overturned. Your motivations are pretty good.
Here's my $35. Count me in. Go get 'em.
Last edited: